Mandatory Minimum Penalties: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:55, 6 April 2021

< Sentencing
< Available Sentences

General Principles

See also: Statutory Maximum Penalties

The Criminal Code give judges a wide range of sentencing options that are to be guided by the sentencing principles rather than constrained by sentencing grids and minimums as occurs in other countries.^[1] Judicial discretion is a "central feature of the sentencing process in Canada."^[2]

Effect of Minimum on Range of Sentence

It has been agreed upon by several courts that mandatory minimums act as an "inflationary floor" and sets a new minimum punishment for the best offender.^[3]

The mininum "introduces a higher starting point" which creates "a narrower range" within which sentencing principles operate. ^[4]

When Minimums are Applied

It would be wrong to impose the minimum on the least culpable offender in the least serious circumstances and then provide the same sentence upon someone who is more culpable and for a more serious offence where they would have received that sentence under the old regime.^[5]

Raised minimums should not create a standard sentence to be "imposed on all but the very worst offender ... in the very worst circumstances".^[6]

Minimums cannot be applied retrospectively.^[7]

Remand Credit

Section 719(3) permits taking into account remand credit to sentence, and can have the effect of bringing a sentence below the mandatory minimum penalty.^[8]

↑ R v Thurairajah, 2008 ONCA 91 (CanLII), per Doherty JA, at para 26
↑ Thurairajah, ibid.
↑ R v Morrisey, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII), per Gonthier J, at para 75 - discussed in minority decision
R v Colville, 2005 ABCA 319 (CanLII), per curiam, at paras 21 to 26
R v Ferguson, 2006 ABCA 261 (CanLII), per Fruman JA, at paras 71 to 72, 85
R v BCM, 2008 BCCA 365 (CanLII), per Neilson JA
R v Newman, 2009 NLCA 32 (CanLII), per Welsh JA
R v Hammond, 2009 ABCA 415 (CanLII), per Watson JA, at para 8
↑ BCM, supra, at para 31
↑ BCM, supra, at para 56
↑ Morrisey, supra, at para 75
↑ R v Serdyuk, 2012 ABCA 205 (CanLII), per Martin JA (2:1)
↑ R v Wust, 2000 SCC 18 (CanLII), per Arbour J
R v Arrance, 2000 SCC 20 (CanLII), per Arbour J
R v Arthurs, 2000 SCC 19 (CanLII), per Arbour J

Notice for Minimum Sentences under the CDSA

Notice

8 The court is not required to impose a minimum punishment unless it is satisfied that the offender, before entering a plea, was notified of the possible imposition of a minimum punishment for the offence in question and of the Attorney General’s intention to prove any factors in relation to the offence that would lead to the imposition of a minimum punishment.
2012, c. 1, s. 42.

– CDSA

Note up: 8

Constitutionality of Minimums

See also: Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Certain mandatory minimums have been assessed on the basis of cruel and unusual punishments:

Offence	Section	Min Penalty	Finding	Case
Using firearm while committing an offence	85(3)(a)	1 year	Constitutional	R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453 (CanLII), 382 CCC (3d) 285, per curiam R v Superales, 2019 ONCA 792 (CanLII), [2019] OJ No 5008, per curiam R v Al-Isawi, 2017 BCCA 163 (CanLII), 348 CCC (3d) 524, per Stromberg-Stein JA
X	95(2)(a)(ii)	5 years	Unconstitutional	R v Nur, 2015 SCC 15 (CanLII), per McLachlin CJ
Sexual Interference (prior to 2015)	151(a)	45 days	Unconstitutional	R v BJT, 2019 ONCA 694 (CanLII), per Feldman JA
Sexual Interference (prior to 2015)	151(a)	45 days	Constitutional	R v Lonegren, 2010 BCSC 960 (CanLII), 260 CCC (3d) 367, per Barrow J R v Craig, 2013 BCSC 2098 (CanLII), [2013] BCJ No 2518, per Bracken J
Sexual Interference (prior to 2015)	151(b)	14 days	Constitutional	R v TMB, 2013 ONSC 4019 (CanLII), 299 CCC (3d) 493, per Code J
recklessly discharging a firearm	244.2(3)(a)(i)	5 years	Constitutional	R v Abdullahi, 2014 ONSC 272 (CanLII), per McWatt J
	244.2(3)(a)(ii)	7 years	Constitutional	R v Mohamed, 2016 ONCJ 492 (CanLII), per Wadden J
	244.2(3)(b)	4 years
Drug Trafficking	5(3)(a)(i)(D) CDSA		Unconstitutional	R v Lloyd, 2014 BCCA 224 (CanLII), per Groberman JA upheld 2016 SCC 13 (CanLII), per McLachlin CJ

Consequence of Unconstitutional Minimums

Where a mandatory minimum was found unconstitutional, the removal of a minimum "does not operate to diminish the whole previously established sentencing pattern" proportionate to the previous minimum.^[1] The removal of the floor will have some "ameliorating effect" on sentencing but not a "wholesale" reduction, which would otherwise defeat the parliamentary intent to characterize the offence as serious.^[2]

However, elimination of minimums "permits the court to treat the less serious cases less seriously".^[3]

↑ R v Mediratta (1988), 29 OAC 333(*no CanLII links) , per Zuber JA, at p. 334
↑ Mediratta, ibid., at p. 334
↑ R v Saulnier, 1987 CanLII 2414 (BCCA), per Seaton JA, at para 6

[1] R v Thurairajah, 2008 ONCA 91 (CanLII), per Doherty JA, at para 26

[2] Thurairajah, ibid.

[3] R v Morrisey, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII), per Gonthier J, at para 75 - discussed in minority decision
R v Colville, 2005 ABCA 319 (CanLII), per curiam, at paras 21 to 26
R v Ferguson, 2006 ABCA 261 (CanLII), per Fruman JA, at paras 71 to 72, 85
R v BCM, 2008 BCCA 365 (CanLII), per Neilson JA
R v Newman, 2009 NLCA 32 (CanLII), per Welsh JA
R v Hammond, 2009 ABCA 415 (CanLII), per Watson JA, at para 8

[4] BCM, supra, at para 31

[5] BCM, supra, at para 56

[6] Morrisey, supra, at para 75

[7] R v Serdyuk, 2012 ABCA 205 (CanLII), per Martin JA (2:1)

[8] R v Wust, 2000 SCC 18 (CanLII), per Arbour J
R v Arrance, 2000 SCC 20 (CanLII), per Arbour J
R v Arthurs, 2000 SCC 19 (CanLII), per Arbour J

[9] R v Mediratta (1988), 29 OAC 333(*no CanLII links) , per Zuber JA, at p. 334

[10] Mediratta, ibid., at p. 334

[11] R v Saulnier, 1987 CanLII 2414 (BCCA), per Seaton JA, at para 6

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{LevelOne}}
+{{HeaderAvailSent}}
 ==General Principles==
 {{seealso|Statutory Maximum Penalties}}