Long-Term and Dangerous Offender Designation: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


A DO order is a "preventative sentence ... in its clearest and most extreme form".<ref>
A DO order is a "preventative sentence ... in its clearest and most extreme form".<ref>
R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64 at para. 33{{fix}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Boutilier|hpg4c|2017 SCC 64 (CanLII)|[2017] 2 SCR 936}}{{perSCC|Côté J}}{{atL|hpg4c|33}}<br>
R v Sipos, 2014 SCC 47, [2014] 2 SCR 423 (S.C.C.), at para. 19{{fix}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Sipos|g7zmr|2014 SCC 47|[2014] 2 SCR 423}}{{perSCC|Cromwell J}}{{atL|g7zmr|19}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


; Purpose  
; Purpose  
The Purpose of DO orders is not punitive and not rehabilitative. It is first and foremost for the purpose of segregating the offender from society.<ref>
The Purpose of DO orders is not punitive and not rehabilitative. It is first and foremost for the purpose of segregating the offender from society.<ref>
{{supra1|Boutilier}}{{At||33}}{{fix}}
{{supra1|Boutilier}}{{At|hpg4c|33}}
</ref>
</ref>
It applies to those offenders where segregation is a "rational means" of achieving public safety.<Ref>
It applies to those offenders where segregation is a "rational means" of achieving public safety.<Ref>
{{supra1|Boutilier}}{{At||33}}{{fix}}
{{supra1|Boutilier}}{{At|hpg4c|33}}
</ref>
</ref>


Revision as of 13:04, 28 August 2021

Introduction

See also: List of Dangerous Offender Designated Offences

Part XXIV of the Code, between s. 752 and 761, creates a regime to designate certain offenders as either "long-term offenders" (LTO) or "dangerous offenders" (DO). These offenders will be subject to either a long-term offender supervision order, in the case of an LTO, or an order of indeterminate detention, in the case of the DO.

A DO order is a "preventative sentence ... in its clearest and most extreme form".[1]

Purpose

The Purpose of DO orders is not punitive and not rehabilitative. It is first and foremost for the purpose of segregating the offender from society.[2] It applies to those offenders where segregation is a "rational means" of achieving public safety.[3]

  1. ↑ R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64 (CanLII), [2017] 2 SCR 936, per Côté J, at para 33
    R v Sipos, 2014 SCC 47, [2014] 2 SCR 423, per Cromwell J, at para 19
  2. ↑ Boutilier, supra, at para hpg4c
  3. ↑ Boutilier, supra, at para hpg4c

History

The provisions of the Criminal Code regarding indefinite detention arose from the 1938 Archambault Report that recommended implementing a regime that separated dangerous offenders from society. In 1947 the first amendments were made creating an indefinite detention order for "habitual criminals".[1]

The first amendment to the Criminal Code introducing the dangerous offender regime was in 1977.[2] It was later amended in 1997 and the in 2008 with the Tackling Violent Crime Act (SC 2008, c. 6).[3]

  1. ↑ R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13 (CanLII), [2012] 1 SCR 433, per LeBel J, at paras 40 to 45
  2. ↑ R v Boutilier, 2016 BCCA 235 (CanLII), 336 CCC (3d) 293, per D Smith JA, at para 24
  3. ↑ Boutilier, ibid., at para 23
    see List of Criminal Code Amendments

Topics

Digests

Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Long-Term_and_Dangerous_Offender_Designation&oldid=78537"