Questioning Checklist: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{HeaderForms}}
{{HeaderForms}}
==Directing Examination-in-Chief==
; Starting Narrative on an Incident
* ask whether they were witness to an incident [describe incident in general terms including rough date], a simple yes or no would do [prior witnesses would establish a foundation to the existence of an incident].
* DON'T start by asking "what, if anything, happened on" so-and-so date
* establish the general time and location of the incident
* ask them to tell what happened by beginning at events immediately before the incident and be sure to tell times, places and names of people when known.
; Uncertain of Quantum (time, duration, distance, height)
* establish that they cannot say the answer
* invite them to give best estimate
* confront them with implausible amounts and get them to deny them.
* gradually ask about growingly likely amounts on the upper and lower end.
* Consider taking a typical common sense point of reference from their lives


==Honest But Mistaken Witness / Conclusory Claim Witness==
==Honest But Mistaken Witness / Conclusory Claim Witness==

Revision as of 21:19, 1 September 2021

Directing Examination-in-Chief

Starting Narrative on an Incident
  • ask whether they were witness to an incident [describe incident in general terms including rough date], a simple yes or no would do [prior witnesses would establish a foundation to the existence of an incident].
  • DON'T start by asking "what, if anything, happened on" so-and-so date
  • establish the general time and location of the incident
  • ask them to tell what happened by beginning at events immediately before the incident and be sure to tell times, places and names of people when known.
Uncertain of Quantum (time, duration, distance, height)
  • establish that they cannot say the answer
  • invite them to give best estimate
  • confront them with implausible amounts and get them to deny them.
  • gradually ask about growingly likely amounts on the upper and lower end.
  • Consider taking a typical common sense point of reference from their lives

Honest But Mistaken Witness / Conclusory Claim Witness

Explore Foundation for Conclusion
  • Was it assumed
  • Was it learned second hand

Overly-Certain Witness

When Did Fact Become Important
  • Explore personal importance of observation at the time
  • Explore whether the events were recorded
  • Explore time when they were notified of importance of this memory
  • Explore efforts to remember in response to the notification.

Evasive/Deceptive Witness

Non-answer
  • Comment that the answer is not responsive
  • Did he understand the question
  • Was the answer responsive to the