Long-Term and Dangerous Offender Designation: Difference between revisions
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==Topics== | ==Topics== | ||
* [[Remand Assessment for LTO/DO Applications]] | * [[Remand Assessment for LTO/DO Applications]] | ||
* [[Procedure in a LTO/DO Designation Hearing]] | |||
* [[Appellate Review of an LTO or DO Designation]] | |||
; LTO | |||
* [[Requirements for a Long Term Offender Designation]] | * [[Requirements for a Long Term Offender Designation]] | ||
* [[Consequences of a Long Term Offender Designation]] | * [[Consequences of a Long Term Offender Designation]] | ||
; DO | |||
* [[Requirements for a Dangerous Offender Designation]] | * [[Requirements for a Dangerous Offender Designation]] | ||
* [[Consequences of a Dangerous Offender Designation]] | * [[Consequences of a Dangerous Offender Designation]] | ||
==Digests== | ==Digests== | ||
* [[LTO and DO Applications (Cases)]] | * [[LTO and DO Applications (Cases)]] | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 1 February 2022
Introduction
Part XXIV of the Code, between s. 752 and 761, creates a regime to designate certain offenders as either "long-term offenders" (LTO) or "dangerous offenders" (DO). These offenders will be subject to either a long-term offender supervision order, in the case of an LTO, or an order of indeterminate detention, in the case of the DO.
A DO order is a "preventative sentence ... in its clearest and most extreme form".[1]
- Purpose
The Purpose of DO orders is not punitive and not rehabilitative. It is first and foremost for the purpose of segregating the offender from society.[2] It applies to those offenders where segregation is a "rational means" of achieving public safety.[3]
- ↑
R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64 (CanLII), [2017] 2 SCR 936, per Côté J, at para 33
R v Sipos, 2014 SCC 47 (CanLII), [2014] 2 SCR 423, per Cromwell J, at para 19
- ↑ Boutilier, supra, at para hpg4c
- ↑ Boutilier, supra, at para hpg4c
History
The provisions of the Criminal Code regarding indefinite detention arose from the 1938 Archambault Report that recommended implementing a regime that separated dangerous offenders from society. In 1947 the first amendments were made creating an indefinite detention order for "habitual criminals".[1]
The first amendment to the Criminal Code introducing the dangerous offender regime was in 1977.[2] It was later amended in 1997 and the in 2008 with the Tackling Violent Crime Act (SC 2008, c. 6).[3]
- ↑ R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13 (CanLII), [2012] 1 SCR 433, per LeBel J, at paras 40 to 45
- ↑
R v Boutilier, 2016 BCCA 235 (CanLII), 336 CCC (3d) 293, per D Smith JA, at para 24
- ↑
Boutilier, ibid., at para 23
see List of Criminal Code Amendments
Topics
- Remand Assessment for LTO/DO Applications
- Procedure in a LTO/DO Designation Hearing
- Appellate Review of an LTO or DO Designation
- LTO
- DO