Initial Post-Charge Detention: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\)\|, \[([0-9]{4})\] ([0-9]+) SCR" to ")|[$1] $2 SCR" |
m Text replacement - "{{perSCC|M" to "{{perSCC-H|M" |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{seealso|Release by Police on Undertaking|Continued Detention After Appearing Before a Justice}} | {{seealso|Release by Police on Undertaking|Continued Detention After Appearing Before a Justice}} | ||
Holding a person in custody when it is not prescribed by the provisions of the Criminal Code would be a violation of s. 9 of the Charter.<ref> | Holding a person in custody when it is not prescribed by the provisions of the Criminal Code would be a violation of s. 9 of the Charter.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Grant|24kwz|2009 SCC 32 (CanLII)|[2009] 2 SCR 353}}{{perSCC|McLachlin CJ and Charron J}}{{atL|24kwz|54}} (“[A] detention not authorized by law is arbitrary and violates s. 9 [of the Charter]”)</ref> | {{CanLIIRP|Grant|24kwz|2009 SCC 32 (CanLII)|[2009] 2 SCR 353}}{{perSCC-H|McLachlin CJ and Charron J}}{{atL|24kwz|54}} (“[A] detention not authorized by law is arbitrary and violates s. 9 [of the Charter]”)</ref> | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 21:48, 30 April 2023
General Principles
Holding a person in custody when it is not prescribed by the provisions of the Criminal Code would be a violation of s. 9 of the Charter.[1]
- ↑ R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 (CanLII), [2009] 2 SCR 353, per McLachlin CJ and Charron J, at para 54 (“[A] detention not authorized by law is arbitrary and violates s. 9 [of the Charter]”)