Established Areas of Privacy: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Tag: wikieditor
Tag: wikieditor
Line 62: Line 62:
Recording the cleavage area of a female using a hidden camera intrudes upon the female's expectation of privacy.<ref>
Recording the cleavage area of a female using a hidden camera intrudes upon the female's expectation of privacy.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Jarvis|hxj07|2019 SCC 10 (CanLII)|[2019] 1 SCR 488}}{{perSCC|Wagner CJ}}
{{CanLIIRP|Jarvis|hxj07|2019 SCC 10 (CanLII)|[2019] 1 SCR 488}}{{perSCC|Wagner CJ}}
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
==Territorial Zones==
===Vehicles===
A driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy for the contents of his motor vehicle.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Belnavis|6jgz|1996 CanLII 4007|91 OAC 3 (CA), 107 CCC (3d) 195}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}}; appeal dismissed [http://canlii.ca/t/1fqzw 1997 CanLII 320], [1997] 3 SCR 341{{perSCC|Cory J}} at 19</ref>
Likewise, a person in possession of a vehicle, even if not the owner, will also have a reasonable expectation of privacy.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Ahmed|j0sp0|2019 SKCA 47 (CanLII)|10 WWR 99}}{{perSKCA|Barrington-Foote JA}}{{atL|j0sp0|18}} ("Mr. Ahmed had possession of the vehicle with the permission of the owner. As such, he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the vehicle: ...")<br>
{{supra1|Belnavis}}{{AtL|6jgz|33}}<br>
</ref>
The reasonable expectation of privacy for a vehicle is low or reduced.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Alkins|1r4fd|2007 ONCA 264 (CanLII)|[2007] OJ No 1348}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Shankar|1r4zm|2007 ONCA 280 (CanLII)|[2007] OJ No 1406}}{{perONCA|Gillese JA}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Rebelo|1r6tr|2007 ONCA 289 (CanLII)|[2007] OJ No 1468}}{{TheCourt}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Caslake|1fqww|1998 CanLII 838 (SCC)|[1998] 1 SCR 51}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}{{atL|1fqww|15}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Nicolosi|6h03|1998 CanLII 2006 (ON CA)|127 CCC (3d) 176}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}}{{atL|6h03|9}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Harflett|gp6lb|2016 ONCA 248 (CanLII)|336 CCC (3d) 102}}{{perONCA|Lauwers JA}}{{atL|gp6lb|47}}<br>
</ref>
It is considered more limited than locations such as houses.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Wise|1fsdl|1992 CanLII 125 (SCC)|[1992] 1 SCR 527}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}{{atL|1fsdl|6}} ("although there remains an expectation of privacy in automobile travel, it is markedly decreased relative to the expectation of privacy in one's home or office.")<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Belnavis|1fqzw|1997 CanLII 320 (SCC)|[1997] 3 SCR 341}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Higgins|1ngfp|1996 CanLII 5774 (QC CA)|111 CCC (3d) 206}}{{perQCCA|Otis JA}}{{atp|212}} <br>
</ref>
This applies even on any public roadway.<ref>
{{ibid1|Higgins}}</ref>
Police, however, are entitled to perform a visual examination of the interior of a vehicle, including with the use of a flashlight, for safety purposes incidental to a lawful vehicle stop.<ref>
e.g. {{CanLIIRx|Bonilla-Perez|g6dm3|2014 ONSC 2031 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Code J}}{{atL|g6dm3|37}}<br>
</ref>
Passengers, however, do not generally have a reasonable expectation of privacy.<ref>See [[Applications_and_Motions_Procedure#Standing|Standing]]</ref>
However, in some cases they can. It will depend on the totality of the circumstances including the passenger's connection with the vehicle, the vehicle's owner, the passenger's use of the vehicle, and ability to control access to it.<ref>
{{supra1|Belnavis}}{{atp|22}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Madore & Madeira|fqzrs|2012 BCCA 160 (CanLII)|320 BCAC 65}}{{perBCCA|Finch CJ}}{{atL|fqzrs|55}}<br>
</ref>
; Door-handle
Any residues on the doorhandle of a vehicle is protected by a lowered expectation of privacy when subject to an Ion Scanner swabbing to detect the presence of drug residue.<ref>
{{CanLIIRx|Wong|gxqf3|2017 BCSC 306 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Kent J}}<br>
</ref>
However, it will still require a judicial authorization to use.<ref>
{{CanLIIRx|Wawrykiewycz|j6nlj|2020 ONCA 269 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Pardu JA}} - ("I would hold that taking samples of residue left by a suspect’s hands on the handles of a vehicle, and subjecting those samples to chemical analysis, is an intrusion for which a warrant should be required.")
</ref>
It is unsettled whether a swab, rather than an Ion Scan, may be available without a warrant. By analogy to drug-sniffing dogs, the presence of reasonable suspicion may be enough to perform a swab without a warrant.
{{reflist|2}}
===Residences===
; House
There is an exceptionally high expectation of privacy in a house. Unlawful entry will be a serious intrusion on the person's privacy rights.<ref>
see {{CanLIIRP|Silveira|1frk8|1995 CanLII 89 (SCC)|[1995] 2 SCR 297}}{{perSCC|Cory J}} at 463-4, 495-6 (the “historic inviolability of a dwelling-house”) and ("There is no place on earth where persons can have a greater expectation of privacy than within their "dwelling‑house"")<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Dhillon|2chjx|2010 ONCA 582 (CanLII)|[2010] OJ No 3749 (CA)}}{{perONCA|Simmons JA}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Tessling|1j0wb|2004 SCC 67 (CanLII)|[2004] 3 SCR 432}}{{perSCC-H|Binnie J}} at 139<br>
</ref>
It is recognized that "our most intimate and private activities are most likely to take place" in the residence. There are no other places as private.<ref>
{{ibid1|Tessling}}{{AtL|1j0wb|22}}<br>
{{supra1|Silveira}}{{atL|1frk8|140}} (“[t]here is no place on earth where persons can have a greater expectation of privacy than within their ‘dwelling-house’.")<br>
</ref>
A police's authority to investigate at a residence without a warrant, barring the established exceptions, "ends at the door."<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Landry|1ftvb|1986 CanLII 48 (SCC)|[1986] 1 SCR 145}}{{perSCC|Estey J}}{{atL|1ftvb|85}} ("At present the rule is clear. Absent well recognized and widely supported exceptions, they may not enter private homes. These exceptions apart, their authority ends at the door. That rule protects them and the public from violence.")<br>
</ref>
It can "be presumed unless the contrary is shown in a particular case that information about what happens inside the home is regarded by the occupants as private."<ref>
{{supra1|Tessling}}{{AtL|1j0wb|144}}
</ref>
A search of a dwelling is considered an invasion of a place with the "highest degree of privacy", especially when the intrusion is at night.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Sutherland|1fbjz|2000 CanLII 17034 (ON CA)|150 CCC (3d) 231}}{{perONCA|Carthy JA}}{{atL|1fbjz|239}} ("search of a dwelling house must be approached with the degree of responsibility appropriate to an invasion of a place where the highest degree of privacy is expected") see also para 23 citing US case of Gooding v US</ref>
However, the privacy in a residence does not "cloak the home in an impenetrable veil of privacy."<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Gomboc|2dhlk|2010 SCC 55 (CanLII)|[2010] 3 SCR 211}}{{atL|2dhlk|46}}
</ref>
; Illegality of Activities Not Relevant
The fact that illegal activities are being carried out within the residence doe not reduce the level of privacy.<ref>
{{supra1|Silveira}}{{atL|1frk8|41}}</ref>
A person will have a diminished expectation of privacy where legislation authorizes police intrusion.<ref>
{{CanLIIRx|DLW|fts53|2012 BCSC 1700 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Romilly J}}{{atL|fts53|38}}<br>
("A person has a restricted objective expectation of privacy when legislation authorizes the police’s intrusion into that person’s privacy.")</ref>
Police intrusion upon private property can only be permitted "only by powers granted in clear statutory language"<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Kokesch|1fsq7|1990 CanLII 55 (SCC)|[1990] 3 SCR 3, 61 CCC (3d) 207}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}{{Atp|218}} ("... This court consistently has held that the common law rights of the property holder to be free of police intrusion can be restricted only by powers granted in clear statutory language.")
</ref>
; Non-residents Found Inside
A non-resident to a residence may have an expectation of privacy, although diminished, where evidence shows that they had personal property that was kept there.
<ref>
e.g. {{CanLIIRx|Jones|fzchh|2013 BCPC 149 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Woods J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Vi|22072|2008 BCCA 481 (CanLII)|239 CCC (3d) 57}}{{perBCCA|Finch CJ}}<br>
</ref>
However, it can vary depending on the application do the Edwards factors.<ref>
{{supra1|Edwards}} - no REP in residence of accused girlfriend's home
</ref>
A person who is merely related to the owner and possesses keys to the location may not have any expectation of privacy.<ref>
e.g. {{CanLIIRx|Edwardsen|j1gtl|2019 BCCA 259 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Harris JA}}{{AtL|j1gtl|58}}
</ref>
; Private Residences Used for Commercial Purposes
A residence that is "solely for the commercial trade in drugs" has a "diminished privacy interest."<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Nguyen|flxb7|2011 ONCA 465 (CanLII)|273 CCC (3d) 37}}{{perONCA|Blair JA}}{{atL|flxb7|61}}
{{CanLIIRP|Shin|ggrtc|2015 ONCA 189 (CanLII)|322 CCC (3d) 554}}{{perONCA|Gillese JA}}{{atL|ggrtc|68}}
</ref>
; Apartment Buildings
There is a diminished, if any, privacy in the hallway of an apartment building.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Brar|1vd3k|2008 MBQB 1 (CanLII)|222 Man R (2d) 243}}{{perMBQB|MacInnes J}}{{atL|1vd3k|44}}
</ref>
Occupants of an apartment building are permitted to expect that the only people present would be other occuapnts or invitees, and that the public would be excluded.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Pipping|j6bvs|2020 BCCA 104 (CanLII)|386 CCC (3d) 431}}{{perBCCA|Garson JA}}
</ref>
Filming the hallway of an apartment, whether or not the interior of the apartments are visible, without a warrant, will generally require a warrant.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Batac|hq0jn|2018 ONSC 546 (CanLII)|402 CRR (2d) 252}}{{perONSC|Dambrot J}} <br>
{{CanLIIRP|Sandhu|hqkpf|2018 ABQB 112 (CanLII)|404 CRR (2d) 216}}{{perABQB|Antonio J}}
</ref>
Covert surveillance of a hallway by an undercover officer requires a general warrant.<Ref>
{{supra1|Pipping}}
</ref>
; Temporary Dwellings
A rented hotel suite has an expectation of privacy while the suspect is renting it.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Mercer|g1390|1992 CanLII 7729 (ON CA)|70 CCC (3d) 180}}{{perONCA|Arbour JA}} - police were let into a hotel room by the owner after a cleaner found an amount of cash and drugs in a pillow case in closet<br>
see also [http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0326p-06.pdf US v Domenech], 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
</ref>Objects outside of plain view of the cleaner can be expected to be private despite the presence of cleaning staff.<ref>
Mercer</ref>
Each unit of a rooming-house will be protected by the REP of the tenant for that room.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Campbell|flz50|2011 SCC 32 (CanLII)|[2011] 2 SCR 549}}{{perSCC|Charron J}}
</ref>
A tenant of a multi-unit building has the same expectation of privacy as a single dwelling unit. A search of a multi-unit building must set out "reasonable and probable grounds for each unit to be searched."<ref>
{{ibid1|Campbell}}
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Non-dwelling Premises===
Provided that there is an expectation of privacy in a non-dwelling premises, the accused's standing may invoked where he has "an ownership interest in the premises" absence countervailing evidence.<ref>
e.g. {{CanLIIRP|Fankhanel|2bqs6|1999 CanLII 19075 (AB QB)|249 AR 391}}{{perABQB-H|Veit J}}<br>
cf. {{CanLIIRP|Pugliese|1npnm|1992 CanLII 2781 (ON CA)|71 CCC (3d) 295}}{{perONCA|Finlayson JA}} - no standing for owner of building who did not live in it<br>
</ref>
; Workplaces and Businesses
The search of a private office will generally require a warrant.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Rao|g12df|1984 CanLII 2184 (ON CA)|46 OR (2d) 80, 10 CRR 275, 12 CCC (3d) 97}}{{perONCA-H|Martin JA}} ("I have, for the reasons which I have set forth, concluded that the search of an office without a warrant where the obtaining of a warrant is not impracticable, is unreasonable and, to that extent, s. 10(1)(a) (of the Narcotic Control Act) is of no force and effect.")
</ref>
A works place has a "relatively low expectation of privacy" in respect to the premises and documents used and produced in the course of business.<ref>
{{CanLIIRPC|Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v Canada (Director of Investigation and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission)|1fsz8|1990 CanLII 135 (SCC)|[1990] 1 SCR 425}}{{perSCC|La Forest J}}{{atL|1fsz8|123}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Silveira|1frk8|1995 CanLII 89 (SCC)|[1995] 2 SCR 297}}{{perSCC|L'Heureux-Dube J}} in dissent{{atL|1frk8|117}}  ("I note that our Court has previously discussed, with respect to the reasonableness of searches and seizures under s. 8 of the Charter, the lower expectancy of privacy in a workplace.")<br>
</ref>
A business "open to the public" has an "implied invitation" for everyone to enter. As such, it has no reasonable expectation of privacy from police.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Fitt|1mqf2|1995 CanLII 4342 (NS CA)|96 CCC (3d) 341}}{{perNSSC|Hallett JJA}} aff'd (1996) 103 CCC (3d) 224, [1996] 1 SCR 70, [http://canlii.ca/t/1frfb 1996 CanLII 251] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Spindloe|1fjk0|2001 SKCA 58 (CanLII)|154 CCC (3d) 8}}{{perSKCA|Jackson JA}}<br>
</ref>
; Schools
The privacy interests of a student attending a school is "significantly diminished."<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|MRM|1fqq9|1998 CanLII 770 (SCC)|[1998] 3 SCR 393}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}{{atL|1fqq9|33}}<br>
{{supra1|Tessling}}{{atL|1j0wb|22}}<br>
</ref>
Students have no expectations of privacy while engaged in common activites on the school premises.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Jarvis|h6lql|2017 ONCA 778 (CanLII)|356 CCC (3d) 1}}{{perONCA|Feldman JA}}
</ref>
; Public Washrooms
A public washroom where a person in engaging in sexual activity is ''not'' necessarily protected by a REP.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|LeBeau|22kn3|1988 CanLII 3271 (ON CA)|41 CCC (3d) 163}}{{TheCourtONCA}}
</ref>
However, in some cases a bathroom stall will be considered private.<ref>
{{CanLIIRx|Wegner|h2mnt|2017 ONSC 1791 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Fairburn J}}
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Holding Cells and Prisons===
Generally, a prison inmate will not usually have any expectation of privacy in a correctional facility.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Lamirande|1dj62|2002 MBCA 41 (CanLII)|164 CCC (3d) 299}}{{perMBCA|Scott CJ}}{{atL|1dj62|31}} - no REP in documents held by inmate
</ref>
There is a "substantially reduced level of privacy" in a prison setting.<ref>
{{CanLIIRPC|Weatherall v Canada (Attorney General)|1fs1z|1993 CanLII 112 (SCC)|[1993] 2 SCR 872}}{{perSCC|LaForest J}}{{atp|877}} ("A substantially reduced level of privacy is present in this setting and a prisoner thus cannot hold a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to these practices.") <br>
{{CanLIIRP|Major|1hcgw|2004 CanLII 12791 (ON CA)|186 CCC (3d) 513, 23 CR (6th) 294}}{{perONCA|Rosenberg JA}}, denied leave [2005] SCCA No 106 - expectation of privacy in family visit trailer<br>
</ref>
The search of a prison cell or frisk of a prisoner and other practices are not subject to any expectation of privacy.<ref>
Weatherall v Canada (Attorney General){{atp|877}} ("Imprisonment necessarily entails surveillance, searching and scrutiny.  A prison cell is expected to be exposed and to require observation.  The frisk search, the count and the wind are all practices necessary in a penitentiary for the security of the institution, the public and indeed the prisoners themselves.")<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Lamirande|1dj62|2002 MBCA 41 (CanLII)|164 CCC (3d) 299}}{{perMBCA|Scott CJ}}, denied leave [2002] SCCA No 203<br>
</ref>
An inmate in a correctional facility has a very limited expectation of privacy over their phone calls.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Drader|fqkdb|2012 ABQB 168 (CanLII)|288 CCC (3d) 120}}{{perABQB|Macklin J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|McIsaac|1k8bl|2005 BCSC 385 (CanLII)|29 CR (6th) 274}}{{perBCSC|Parrrett J}}<br>
</ref>
An accused person being held in a police cell has an expectation of privacy over his own speech, absent a sign warning that there may be recording devices present.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Mohamud|2f1n7|2010 ONSC 6264 (CanLII)|263 CCC (3d) 350}}{{perONSC|Pomerance J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRx|Simon|fxm84|2013 ABQB 95 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|Moreau J}}</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Airports and Border Crossings===
Border crossings are an exceptional case to reasonable expectation of privacy.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Simmons|1ftcb|1988 CanLII 12 (SCC)|45 CCC (3d) 296, [1988] 2 SCR 495}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}} ("...the degree of personal privacy reasonably expected at customs is lower than in most other situations. People do not expect to be able to cross international borders free from scrutiny.")<br>
See also {{CanLIIRP|Monney|1fqnx|1999 CanLII 678 (SCC)|[1999] 1 SCR 652, 133 CCC (3d) 129}}{{perSCC|Iacobucci J}} <br>
{{CanLIIRP|Jacques|1fr7n|1996 CanLII 174 (SCC)|[1996] 3 SCR 312, 110 CCC (3d) 1}}{{perSCC|Gonthier J}}<br>
</ref>
There is a lower expectation of privacy since people accept that foreign countries have a right to control who enters their country and can screen people for illegal goods. This permits physical searches of luggage and person "where there are grounds for suspecting that a person has made false declaration and is transporting prohibited goods."<ref>
{{supra1|Simmons}}{{atps|528-29}} [SCR]
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Outdoor Areas===
Trespasser growing marijuana in abandoned but secluded fields do not possess any REP.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Lauda|1fqrt|1998 CanLII 804 (SCC)|[1998] 2 SCR 683}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}<br>
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Schools===
School lockers have a reduced expectation of privacy due to school's authorities responsibility to provide a "safe environment and maintaining order and discipline in the school."<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|MRM|1fqq9|1998 CanLII 770 (SCC)|[1998] 3 SCR 393}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}<br>
see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._v._M._(M.R.)<br>
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Storage Lockers===
A bus stop locker will be private despite emanations from the locker.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Buhay|1g6p7|2003 SCC 30 (CanLII)|[2003] 1 SCR 631}}{{perSCC-H|Arbour J}}<br>
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Suit Cases===
There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in a suit case.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Kang-Brown|1wnbc|2008 SCC 18 (CanLII)|[2008] 1 SCR 456}}{{perSCC|LeBel J}}
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Packages===
Parcel accepted for delivery by a courier service can still have a reasonable expectation of privacy.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Fry|27prk|1999 CanLII 18945 (NL CA)|(1999) NJ No 352, 142 CCC (3d) 166}}{{perNLCA|Green JA}}
</ref>
However, that objective expectation can be negated by circumstances such as search clause in the shipping contract.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Godbout|g8kk8|2014 BCCA 319 (CanLII)|315 CCC (3d) 90}}{{perBCCA|Goepel JA}} - police open package without warrant
</ref>
Where a package has been opened either unlawfully or inadvertently by a non-state agent, discovering evidence of an offence such as cocaine, there may still be a reasonable expectation of privacy requiring a warrant.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Washington|1tkht|2007 BCCA 540 (CanLII)|227 CCC (3d) 214}}{{perBCCA|Ryan JA}}<br>
cf. {{CanLIIRP|Snow|1knrc|2005 NLTD 81 (CanLII)|741 APR 64}}{{perNLSC|Dymond J}} - opened package seizeable without warrant
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
===Garbage===
Garbage bags themselves contain information that "paint a fairly accurate and complete picture of the householder's activities and lifestyles."<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Patrick|231wj|2009 SCC 17 (CanLII)|[2009] 1 SCR 579}}{{perSCC-H|Binnie J}}{{atL|231wj|30}}<br>
</ref>
Generally speaking, materials found in a dumpster or left on the street curb for pickup are [[Warrantless Search of Abandoned Property|abandoned]] and so have no expectation of privacy.<ref>
{{CanLIIRx|Sipes|fxh4n|2008 BCSC 1500 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Smart J}} and {{CanLII|fvfd1|2012 BCSC 1948 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Smart J}}<br>
{{supra1|Patrick}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Revision as of 19:27, 3 August 2023

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed July 2021. (Rev. # 86916)

Introduction

See also: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

Courts have set out specific rules and principles when dealing with certain situations where privacy interests have been found. Those circumstances include searches of persons, residences, vehicles, storage, and more recently electronic devices.

A person can have a reasonable expectation of privacy "related to contraband."[1]

  1. ↑ R v AM, 2008 SCC 19 (CanLII), [2008] SCJ No 19, per LeBel J, at para 73
    R v Butters, 2014 ONCJ 228 (CanLII), 311 CCC (3d) 516, per Paciocco J, at para 26

Personal Zones

Bags, Pockets, Purses

Bags and pockets are protected.[1]

An individual who attends a hospital for medical treatment is entitled to expect that his clothing will be held by the facility until discharged. Hospitals have been identified as an area of concern for the protection of privacy. [2]

Bodily Samples

DNA samples taken as part of a previous sentence is not protected by a reasonable expectation of privacy.[3]

Fingerprints

Fingerprints taken as part of a previous sentence is not protected by a reasonable expectation of privacy.[4]

Photographs

Photographs taken as part of a previous sentence is not protected by a reasonable expectation of privacy.[5]

Body Cavity

Strip searches can be humiliating, embarrassing, and degrading for the accused.[6] It is also one of the most extreme forms of search available to police.[7]

Inmates

A person convicted of a crime has a reduced expectation of privacy.[8] Accordingly, an inmate should have less expectation of privacy in their personal zone of privacy.[9]

Sound of Voice

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the "sound" of one's voice. [10]

Licences and registration

There is no intrusion on REP where a person is required to present documents proving compliance with a legal requirement in order to have a right of privilege.[11]

Upskirts and Down Shirts

Recording the cleavage area of a female using a hidden camera intrudes upon the female's expectation of privacy.[12]

  1. ↑ R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 (CanLII), [2009] 2 SCR 353, per McLachlin CJ and Charron J
  2. ↑ R v Pickton, 2006 BCSC 1098 (CanLII), 260 CCC (3d) 232, per Williams J, at para 38 citing R v Calarusso, 1994 CanLII 134 (SCC), [1994] 1 SCR 20, per Lamer C.J. and Cory, McLachlin and Major JJ, at para 70
  3. ↑ R v DeJesus, 2010 ONCA 581 (CanLII), OJ No 3744, per curiam
  4. ↑ R v Jackpine (Rodgers), 2006 SCC 15 (CanLII), [2006] 1 SCR 554, 207 CCC (3d) 225, per Charron J, at para 43 - anything taken under the Identification of Criminals Act has no REP
  5. ↑ Jackpine (Rodgers), ibid., at para 43 - anything taken under the Identification of Criminals Act has no REP
  6. ↑ R v Golden, 2001 SCC 83 (CanLII), [2001] 3 SCR 679, per Charron J, at para 89
  7. ↑ R v Flintoff, 1998 CanLII 632 (ON CA), 126 CCC (3d) 321, per Finlayson JA, at para 24
  8. ↑ R v Briggs, 2001 CanLII 24113 (ON CA), 157 CCC (3d) 38, per Weiler JA, at paras 33 to 35
  9. ↑ Briggs, ibid.
  10. ↑ R v Pelland, 1997 CanLII 502 (ON CA), 99 OAC 62, 34 WCB (2d) 356, per curiam - police surreptitiously record the accused voice in a public place
    R v Adam et al, 2006 BCSC 1430 (CanLII), per Romilly J, at paras 9 to 11 - use of voice may still violate s. 13 for incrimination.
  11. ↑ R v Hufsky, 1988 CanLII 72, [1988] 1 SCR 621, per Le Dain J
  12. ↑ R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 (CanLII), [2019] 1 SCR 488, per Wagner CJ

Informational Privacy

See Established Areas of Informational Privacy

Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Established_Areas_of_Privacy&oldid=86916"