Adjournments (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "C.C.C." to "CCC" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| R v Warren <br>(1973), 14 CCC 188 {{NOCANLII}}|| | | R v Warren <br>(1973), 14 CCC 188 {{NOCANLII}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Darville v The Queen<br> (1956), 1956), 116 | | Darville v The Queen<br> (1956), 1956), 116 CCC 113, 25 C.R. 1, [http://canlii.ca/t/hsqkr 1956 CanLII 463] (SCC)|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 25 October 2018
Case Digests
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Kandola and Johal, 2012 BCSC 1012 (CanLII) |
adjournment for pre-sentence report denied |
| R v Sanborn, 2012 BCPC 41 (CanLII) |
crown not opposed -- adjournment denied |
| R v Downey, 2011 ABQB 805 (CanLII) |
failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned |
| R v Cole, 2010 NSCA 59 (CanLII) |
crown adjournment of trial refused |
| R v Marshall, 2009 NSPC 6 (CanLII) |
Trial adjournment granted |
| R v Oliver and Morrison, 2005 CanLII 3582 (2005) 194 CCC (3d) 92 (Ont. CA) |
|
| R v Brundia 2007 ONCA 725 (CanLII) |
|
| R v Roebuck, 2001 ABQB 111 (CanLII) |
|
| R v Nichols, 2001 CanLII 5680 (ON C.A.) |
refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel |
| R v J.E.B. (1989), 1989 CanLII 1495 (NS CA), 52 CCC 224 (NSCA) |
|
| R v Smith, (1989), 52 CCC (3d) 90 (Ont. C.A.), 1989 CanLII 7222 (ON CA) |
|
| R v Manhas, [1980] 1 SCR 591 1980 CanLII 72 |
|
| Barrette, [1977] 2 SCR 121 1976 CanLII 80 |
|
| R v Spataro, 1972 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1974] SCR 253 |
|
| R v Warren (1973), 14 CCC 188 (*no CanLII links) |
|
| Darville v The Queen (1956), 1956), 116 CCC 113, 25 C.R. 1, 1956 CanLII 463 (SCC) |