Child Pornography (Trial Verdicts)
- < Criminal Law
- < Cases
| ||||||||
Case Digests
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Tyler Perkins, 2013 ONSC 1807 (CanLII), per Ferguson J |
evidence excluded | S. 8, 9, 10(b) of Charter raised. |
| R v Giuseppe Michienzi, 2013 ONSC 1025 (CanLII), per Bryant J |
guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available | |
| R v Douglas 2013 SKQB 33] (CanLII), per Schwann J |
guilty of poss'n and making avail. | through treatment of evidence and law |
| R v Lorenz, 2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII), per Schwann J | acquitted for making CP | |
| R v Jacques, 2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII), per McMurtry J | guilty of possession and not guilty of making available | P2P case |
| R v Clayton 2012 ABQB 196 (CanLII), per Eidsvik J |
conviction | gigatribe distribution |
| R v Allart, 2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII), per Groberman JA | conviction for poss’n CP | |
| R v Jeffrey, 2012 SKPC 12 (CanLII), per Agnew J | guilty of distributing | |
| R v Wanamaker 2011 ABQB 310 (CanLII), per H McDonald J |
guilty | |
| R v SS 2011 SKPC 102 (CanLII), per Koskie J |
not guilty | judge could not determine age of youths in images |
| R v Carrano, 2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII), per Trotter J | acquittal for innocent possession of CP | |
| R v Jones, 2011 ONCA 632 (CanLII), per Blair JA | new trial ordered | |
| R v Smith, 2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII), per Brown J | ||
| R v Love, 2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII), per Philp J | not guilty | not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession |
| R v R.D. 2010 BCCA 313 (CanLII), per Bennett JA |
not guilty | |
| R v Garbett, 2010 ONSC 2762 (CanLII), per Tulloch J | ||
| R v Spencer, 2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA | conviction upheld | |
| R v Leugner, 2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII), per Keene J | accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books | |
| R v Leugner 2010 SKPC 50 (CanLII), per Kovatch J |
guilty of importing and possession | fictional stories of child sexual abuse |
| R v Rudiger, 2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII), per Blaskovits J | guilty | possession; considered definition |
| R v Pressacco, 2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII), per Currie J | guilty of possessing and accessing CP | |
| R v C.M. 2009 MBPC 35 (CanLII), per Martin J |
guilty of making and possessing CP | |
| R v Grant 2009 BCCA 72 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty | |
| R v Trapp, 2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII), per Kolenick J | conviction for making CP available | |
| R v Ballendine, 2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII), per Cullen J | not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else | |
| R v Johannson, 2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J | guilty of making available | |
| R v Dittrich 2008 CanLII 19217 (ON SC), per Jenkins J |
guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making | |
| R v Dabrowski, 2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII), per MacPherson JA | ||
| R v Tripp, 2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII), per Arseneault J | not guilty for possession | |
| R v Horvat 2006 CanLII 13426 (ON SC), per Lack J |
guilty | |
| R v Beattie 2005 CanLII 10273 (ON CA), per Laskin JA |
acquittal overturned | pornographic stories |
| R v J.E.I. 2005 BCCA 584 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty | considers dominant purpose |
| R v S. (V.P.) 2001 BCSC 619 (CanLII), per Bauman J |
guilty | considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose |
| R v Nedelec, 2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII), per Wedge J | guilty of possession | considers definition |
| R v Weir, 1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII), per PLJ Smith J | guilty of distribution |