Compelling Attendance of Witnesses
| This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 85601) |
General Principles
A compellable witness is "one who may be forced by means of a subpoena to give evidence in court under the threat of contempt proceedings."[1]
Part XXII of the Code (s. 697 to 715.2) governs the procuring of attendance for witnesses. Section 697 states:
- Application
697 Except where section 527 [procuring attendance] applies, this Part [Pt. XXII – Procuring Attendance (ss. 697 to 715.2)] applies where a person is required to attend to give evidence in a proceeding to which this Act applies.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 625.
[annotation(s) added]
A competent witness is generally a compellable witness.[2] An incompetent witness is generally not compellable.
Historically, witnesses can be compelled to attend court under either a writ subpoena ad testificandum which requires the person to give oral evidence or a writ of subpoena duces tecum which requires the person to bring certain records or documents to the court.[3]
Crown and defence counsel are both compellable witnesses.[4]
- Copies of Summons, Warrants or Subpoena
Under s. 708.1, faxed copies of the warrant, subpoena, or summons has the same value as an original.
- Electronically transmitted copies
708.1 A copy of a summons, warrant or subpoena transmitted by a means of telecommunication that produces a writing has the same probative force as the original for the purposes of this Act.
1997, c. 18, s. 101.
- Youth Court Justice
- Issue of subpoena
144 (1) If a person is required to attend to give evidence before a youth justice court, the subpoena directed to that person may be issued by a youth justice court judge, whether or not the person whose attendance is required is within the same province as the youth justice court.
- Service of subpoena
(2) A subpoena issued by a youth justice court and directed to a person who is not within the same province as the youth justice court shall be served personally on the person to whom it is directed.
- Court of Appeal
The Court of Appeal has powers to compel witnesses under s. 683(1)(b).[5]
- ↑
R v Darrach, 2000 SCC 46 (CanLII), [2000] 2 SCR 443, per Gonthier J, at para 48
R v Nguyen, 2015 ONCA 278 (CanLII), 125 OR (3d) 321, per Gillese JA, at para 13 - ↑
R v Schell, 2004 ABCA 143 (CanLII), 188 CCC (3d) 254, per Paperny JA
R v Czipps, 1979 CanLII 2095 (ON CA), 48 CCC (2d) 166 (ONCA), per Morden JA - ↑ Ontario (Provincial Police) v Mosher, 2015 ONCA 722 (CanLII), 330 CCC (3d) 149, per Watt JA
- ↑ R v Gervais, 1992 CanLII 3144 (QC CA), 75 CCC (3d) 61, per curiam
- ↑ see also Appellate Evidence
Applying for Witness Subpoenas
Section 698 allows the ordering of a subpoena requiring a witness to attend court:
- Subpoena
698 (1) Where a person is likely to give material evidence in a proceeding to which this Act applies, a subpoena may be issued in accordance with this Part [Pt. XXII – Procuring Attendance (ss. 697 to 715.2)] requiring that person to attend to give evidence.
- Warrant in Form 17
(2) Where it is made to appear that a person who is likely to give material evidence
- (a) will not attend in response to a subpoena if a subpoena is issued, or
- (b) is evading service of a subpoena,
a court, justice or provincial court judge having power to issue a subpoena to require the attendance of that person to give evidence may issue a warrant in Form 17 [forms] to cause that person to be arrested and to be brought to give evidence.
- Subpoena issued first
(3) Except where paragraph (2)(a) [power to issue witness warrant – belief of evasion of subpoena] applies, a warrant in Form 17 [forms] shall not be issued unless a subpoena has first been issued.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 698; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203.
[annotation(s) added]
The key factor is that the issuing party must be able to establish that the witness would likely or probably have material evidence to give. It is not enough that the witness "may have" material evidence.[1]
Where the subpoena is not valid it may be quashed by a superior court judge.[2]
- ↑
R v Harris, 1994 CanLII 2986 (ON CA), 93 CCC (3d) 478, per curiam
- ↑
R v A, 1990 CanLII 101 (SCC), [1990] 1 SCR 995, per Cory J
R v Black, 2002 NSSC 42 (CanLII), [2002] NSJ 71 (NSSC), per Murphy J
Application Process
A judge or justice issuing a subpoena must take at least some steps or some "examination" in order "to satisfy himself that the person is likely to give material evidence."[1] There should be "some case-specific inquiry" on the part of the issuer. It should not be “issued for the asking”.[2] However, in practice judges and justices will regularly issue subpoenas without making inquiry of any evidence.[3]
In most cases, submissions of counsel will be sufficient for the judge to be satisfied with threshold requirements for a subpoena.[4] There should not be a requirement for affidavits or oral evidence. To do otherwise risks bogging down the system.[5]
- Discretionary Decision
Whether to issue a subpoena for a witness is an exercise in statutory discretion.[6]
A judge maintains discretion to excuse an expert witness who is under a valid subpoena.[7]
- Sealing
It is generally recommended that any material filed on an application for a subpoena should be sealed.[8]
- ↑
Foley v Gares, 1989 CanLII 5134 (SK CA), 53 CCC (3d) 82, per Bayda CJ
- ↑ Dykstra v Greensword, 2016 ONSC 8211 (CanLII), OJ No 7263, per Durno J , at para 90
- ↑
E.g. R v Regan, 1998 CanLII 17566 (NS SC), 173 NSR (2d) 298, per MacDonald J
- ↑ Dykstra, supra , at para 90
- ↑
R v Ross, 1994 CanLII 7584 (NS SC), 131 NSR (2d) 258, 371 APR 258 (N.S.S.C.), per Boudreau J
R v Glover, 2018 ONSC 3860 (CanLII), per Williams J, at para 30
- ↑ Dykstra, ibid. , at para 90
- ↑ R v Blais, 2008 BCCA 389 (CanLII), 238 CCC (3d) 434, per Bauman JA
- ↑
Dykstra, supra, at para 90 ("...where any material is filed on an application for a subpoena whether for a Crown or defence subpoena, it should be sealed, and must not be opened without a court order and kept in the court file..."
Power to Issue Witness Subpoenas
- Who may issue
699 (1) If a person is required to attend to give evidence before a superior court of criminal jurisdiction, a court of appeal, an appeal court or a court of criminal jurisdiction other than a provincial court judge acting under Part XIX [Pt. XIX – Indictable Offences – Trial Without a Jury (ss. 552 to 572)], a subpoena directed to that person shall be issued out of the court before which the attendance of that person is required.
- Order of judge
(2) If a person is required to attend to give evidence before a provincial court judge acting under Part XIX [Pt. XIX – Indictable Offences – Trial Without a Jury (ss. 552 to 572)] or a summary conviction court under Part XXVII [Pt. XXVII – Summary Convictions (ss. 785 to 840)] or in proceedings over which a justice has jurisdiction, a subpoena directed to the person shall be issued
- (a) by a provincial court judge or a justice, where the person whose attendance is required is within the province in which the proceedings were instituted; or
- (b) by a provincial court judge or out of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction of the province in which the proceedings were instituted, where the person whose attendance is required is not within the province.
- Order of judge
(3) A subpoena shall not be issued out of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction pursuant to paragraph (2)(b) [power to order a subpoena – person outside province], except pursuant to an order of a judge of the court made on application by a party to the proceedings.
[omitted (4), (5), (5.1), (6) and (7)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 699; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203; 1994, c. 44, s. 69; 1997, c. 30, s. 2; 1999, c. 5, s. 28; 2019, c. 25, s. 284.
[annotation(s) added]
The court before which the witness may testify will issue has the authority to issue a subpoena.[1]
Where the matter is before a provincial court judge and the person is within the province, a provincial court judge may order their attendance by issuing a subpoena under s.699(2)(a). However, under s. 699(2)(b), where the witness is out of province, either a provincial court a superior court judge may order the subpoena.
Where the matter is before a superior court judge, only that court may issue a subpoena compelling attendance (s. 699(1)).
- Provincial Court Trial For Out-of-Province Witness
699 [omitted (1)]
- Order of judge
(2) If a person is required to attend to give evidence before a provincial court judge acting under Part XIX [Pt. XIX – Indictable Offences – Trial Without a Jury (ss. 552 to 572)] or a summary conviction court under Part XXVII [Pt. XXVII – Summary Convictions (ss. 785 to 840)] or in proceedings over which a justice has jurisdiction, a subpoena directed to the person shall be issued
- (a) by a provincial court judge or a justice, where the person whose attendance is required is within the province in which the proceedings were instituted; or
- (b) by a provincial court judge or out of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction of the province in which the proceedings were instituted, where the person whose attendance is required is not within the province.
[omitted (3), (4), (5), (5.1), (6) and (7)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 699; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203; 1994, c. 44, s. 69; 1997, c. 30, s. 2; 1999, c. 5, s. 28; 2019, c. 25, s. 284.
[annotation(s) added]
- ↑ s. 699(1)
Power to Compel Records Through Witness
- Subpoena Duces Tecum
A subpoena duces tecum is not a form of production or disclosure order. It cannot be used to circumvent standard methods of ordering production and disclosure.[1]
- Section 700 Subpeona
- Contents of subpoena
700 (1) A subpoena shall require the person to whom it is directed to attend, at a time and place to be stated in the subpoena, to give evidence and, if required, to bring with him anything that he has in his possession or under his control relating to the subject-matter of the proceedings.
[omitted (2)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 700; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 148, 203.
Records that are merely obtainable by the witness is not sufficient to compel the witness to bring them to court. The witness must have authority, control, or direction over the records.[2]
- ↑ Mosher, supra
- ↑ R v Gascon, 2019 ABQB 338 (CanLII), per Burrows J
Form of the Subpoena
The subpoena must be under the seal of the court with the signature of either the judge or his clerk.[1] It should also have the signature of the judge.[2] The subpoena should comply with Form 16.[3]
- Sexual Offences
Sexual offences referred to s. 278.2(1) [production of records for sexual offences] must comply with s. 699(5.1). The subpoena should conform to Form 16.1[4]
699.
[omitted (1), (2) and (3)]
- Seal
(4) A subpoena or warrant that is issued by a court under this Part [Pt. XXII – Procuring Attendance (ss. 697 to 715.2)] shall be under the seal of the court and shall be signed by a judge of the court or by the clerk of the court.
- Signature
(5) A subpoena or warrant that is issued by a justice or provincial court judge under this Part [Pt. XXII – Procuring Attendance (ss. 697 to 715.2)] must be signed by the justice, provincial court judge or the clerk of the court.
- Sexual offences
(5.1) Despite anything in subsections (1) to (5) [powers related to subpoenas (select)], in the case of an offence referred to in subsection 278.2(1) [production of records for sexual offences], a subpoena requiring a witness to bring to the court a record, the production of which is governed by sections 278.1 to 278.91 [provisions re production of records for sexual offences], must be issued by a judge and signed by the judge or the clerk of the court.
- Form of subpoena
(6) Subject to subsection (7) [form of subpoena in sexual offences], a subpoena issued under this Part [Pt. XXII – Procuring Attendance (ss. 697 to 715.2)] may be in Form 16 [forms].
- Form of subpoena in sexual offences
(7) In the case of an offence referred to in subsection 278.2(1) [production of records for sexual offences], a subpoena requiring a witness to bring anything to the court shall be in Form 16.1 [forms].
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 699 R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203; 1994, c. 44, s. 69; 1997, c. 30, s. 2; 1999, c. 5, s. 28; 2019, c. 25, s. 284.
[annotation(s) added]
Contents
- In Person Attendance
- Contents of subpoena
700 (1) A subpoena shall require the person to whom it is directed to attend, at a time and place to be stated in the subpoena, to give evidence and, if required, to bring with him anything that he has in his possession or under his control relating to the subject-matter of the proceedings.
- Witness to appear and remain
(2) A person who is served with a subpoena issued under this Part [Pt. XXII – Procuring Attendance (ss. 697 to 715.2)] shall attend and shall remain in attendance throughout the proceedings unless he is excused by the presiding judge, justice or provincial court judge.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 700; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 148, 203.
[annotation(s) added]
- Video Link Attendance
- Video links
700.1 (1) If a person is to give evidence under section 714.1 [audioconference and videoconference – witness in Canada] or under subsection 46(2) of the Canada Evidence Act — or is to give evidence or a statement under an order made under section 22.2 of the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act — at a place within the jurisdiction of a court referred to in subsection 699(1) [power to issue subpoena] or (2) [power to order a subpoena] where the technology is available, a subpoena shall be issued out of the court to order the person to give that evidence at that place.
- Sections of Criminal Code
(2) Sections 699 [powers related to subpoenas], 700 [contents and obligations re subpoena] and 701 [service of subpoena] to 703.2 [service of process on an organization] apply, with any modifications that the circumstances require, to a subpoena issued under this section.
1999, c. 18, s. 94; 2019, c. 25, s. 285.
[annotation(s) added]
Service of Subpeona
- Service
701 (1) Subject to subsection (2) [subpoena personal service], a subpoena shall be served in a province by a peace officer or any other person who is qualified in that province to serve civil process, in accordance with subsection 509(2) [summons – service on individual]
http://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php/Compelling_Attendance_by_Accused_Without_Arrest#Content_of_Summons, with such modifications as the circumstances require.
- Personal service
(2) A subpoena that is issued pursuant to paragraph 699(2)(b) [power to order a subpoena – person outside province] shall be served personally on the person to whom it is directed.
(3) [Repealed, 2008, c. 18, s. 32]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 701; 1994, c. 44, s. 70; 2008, c. 18, s. 32.
[annotation(s) added]
- Service in accordance with provincial laws
701.1 Despite section 701 [service of subpoena], in any province, service of a document may be made in accordance with the laws of the province relating to offences created by the laws of that province.
1997, c. 18, s. 100; 2008, c. 18, s. 33.
[annotation(s) added]
- Subpoena effective throughout Canada
702 (1) A subpoena that is issued by a provincial court judge or out of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction, a court of appeal, an appeal court or a court of criminal jurisdiction has effect anywhere in Canada according to its terms.
- Subpoena effective throughout province
(2) A subpoena that is issued by a justice has effect anywhere in the province in which it is issued.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 702; 1994, c. 44, s. 71.
- Warrant effective throughout Canada
703 (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a warrant of arrest or committal that is issued out of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction, a court of appeal, an appeal court within the meaning of section 812 [definition of appeal court] or a court of criminal jurisdiction other than a provincial court judge acting under Part XIX [Pt. XIX – Indictable Offences – Trial Without a Jury (ss. 552 to 572)] may be executed anywhere in Canada.
- Warrant effective in a province
(2) Despite any other provision of this Act but subject to subsections 487.0551(2) [warrant jurisdiction on breach of DNA order] and 705(3) [warrant effective throughout Canada], a warrant of arrest or committal that is issued by a justice or provincial court judge may be executed anywhere in the province in which it is issued.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 703; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 149; 2007, c. 22, s. 22.
[annotation(s) added]
- Summons effective throughout Canada
703.1 A summons may be served anywhere in Canada and, if served, is effective notwithstanding the territorial jurisdiction of the authority that issued the summons.
R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 149.
- Service of process on an organization
703.2 Where any summons, notice or other process is required to be or may be served on an organization, and no other method of service is provided, service may be effected by delivery
- (a) in the case of a municipality, to the mayor, warden, reeve or other chief officer of the municipality, or to the secretary, treasurer or clerk of the municipality; and
- (b) in the case of any other organization, to the manager, secretary or other senior officer of the organization or one of its branches.
R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 149; 2003, c. 21, s. 13.
Quashing a Subpoena
- Superior Court Jurisdiction
Only a superior court justice has the power to quash a subpoena.[1] This is normally done by way of the prerogative writ of certiorari which is an extraordinary remedy available only to superior courts of inherent jurisdiction.[2]
- Provincial Court Jurisdiction
There is some suggestion that a preliminary inquiry judge may be entitled under s. 700(2) to adjudicate whether the witness has relevant testimony and excuse them if the evidence would be immaterial to the hearing.[3]
- Calling Opposing Counsel
It is only in "exceptional circumstances that Crown or defence counsel will be permitted to call opposing counsel as a witness."[4]
In order to call opposing counsel there must be an "evidentiary foundation for showing that the counsel's evidence is likely to be relevant and necessary."[5]
The standard is a high one requiring that there is "a real basis for believing that it is likely the witness can give material evidence."[6]
The reason for this standard is to avoid the mischief of trials being interrupted at random for fishing expeditions.[7]
The standard will be the same whether it is Crown or defence.[8]
- Crown Counsel
Crown counsel can seek to quash a subpeona on the basis that it amounts to a "fishing expedition."[9]
A subpoena for a Crown counsel may only be permitted where "the evidence cannot be obtained in any other way."[10] The added requirement to subpoena a Crown witness remains the same even once the Crown counsel is not longer counsel on the case.[11]
Subpoena power should be used cautiously to avoid frustrating the role of counsel by making them a witness in a case.[12]
Defence counsel cannot subpoena previous Crown counsel to give evidence on the reason for relying on notice of a prior conviction contrary to policy as it was not "absolutely essential."[13]
- ↑
R v Ben Aïssa, 2016 QCCQ 2830 (CanLII), QJ 15685, per Mascia J, at paras 24 to 29 - a preliminary inquiry judge has no power to rule on request to quash
R v Rashwan, 2004 CanLII 41169 (ON SC), per Spiegel J
R v Primeau, 1995 CanLII 143 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 60, per Sopinka and Iacobucci JJ re application for a writ of prohibition and remedy under s. 24(1) of Charter
- ↑ see Writ of Certiorari
- ↑
Ben Aïssa, supra, at paras 30 to 33 ("...a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice (provincial court)—though powerless to decide an application to quash—was entitled by virtue of s. 700(2) of the Criminal Code to hear submissions as to whether or not the evidence was receivable at the trial...")
R v Maleki, 2006 ONCJ 401 (CanLII), 1 CTC 212, per Lane J, at para 4 (" ...while it was quite true that only the superior court has jurisdiction to quash subpoenas, such an order was not necessary, and that it was for the trial judge to make a determination of whether or not the evidence of the applicant is receivable on the trial. “If the trial judge concluded that the evidence was not receivable then he has the power, under s. 628(2) (now s. 700(2)) of the Criminal Code, to excuse the witness from attending.” ")
Re. Chase and the Queen, 1982 CanLII 304 (BC SC), 1 CCC (3d) 188, per MacKay J - ↑
R v Elliott, 2003 CanLII 24447 (ON CA), 181 CCC (3d) 118, per curiam, at para 114 ("It is only in exceptional circumstances that Crown or defence counsel will be permitted to call opposing counsel as a witness. It is not sufficient that the counsel may have material evidence to give. The party seeking to call opposing counsel must lay an evidentiary foundation for showing that the counsel’s evidence is likely to be relevant and necessary. This stringent test applies whether it is defence counsel seeking to call Crown counsel or Crown counsel seeking to call defence counsel. ...")
- ↑
Elliott, ibid., at para 114
- ↑
Elliott, ibid., at para 114
R v Stupp, Winthrope and Manus, 1982 CanLII 1897 (ON SC), 36 OR (2d) 206 at 219 (Ont. H.C.J.), per Craig J ("In my opinion, an accused person should not be permitted to call Crown counsel to conduct a fishing expedition or to examine in the hope that something might turn up that would assist him on the issue; but rather counsel must satisfy the judge that there is a real basis for believing that it is likely the witness can give material evidence")
- ↑
Stupp, ibid. ("If it is otherwise, preliminary hearings and trials can be interrupted at random; and the administration of criminal justice could be seriously impaired.")
- ↑
Elliott, supra, at para 114
- ↑ R v Harris, 1994 CanLII 2986 (ON CA), 93 CCC (3d) 478, per curiam
- ↑
R v Regan, [1996] NSJ No 625(*no CanLII links)
Harris, supra
R v Gervais, 1992 CanLII 3144 (QC CA), 75 CCC (3d) 61, per curiam
Black, supra
- ↑ Regan, supra (1996)
- ↑ R v Sungalia, [1992] OJ No 3718(*no CanLII links)
- ↑ R v Kim, 2010 ABQB 810 (CanLII), 507 AR 81, per Manderscheid J
Parliamentary Privilege
A member of a provincial or federal legislature can be exempt from attending court under subpoena on the basis of parliamentary privilege. The application of the privilege will be subject to an evaluation of necessity.[1]
- ↑ Samson Indian Nation and Band v Canada, 2003 FC 975 (CanLII), [2004] 1 FCR 556, per Teitelbaum J
Other Protected Parties
Accused and Co-Accused
An accused person is generally assumed competent and compellable for the defence and not competent for the crown.[1]
A co-accused, charged separately, is a competent and compellable witness for both crown and defence. The only exception is if the only purpose in compelling the co-accused is to incriminate them.[2] The same goes for suspects, charged or uncharged.[3]
A co-accused, charged together, is competent but not compellable by the accused. It is the choice of the co-accused to testify.
Where the accused is a corporation, the officers of the corporation are compellable.[4]
- ↑ R v Amway Corp, 1989 CanLII 107 (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 21, per Sopinka J (" At common law an accused was neither competent nor compellable as a witness.")
- ↑ R v Primeau, 1995 CanLII 143 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 60, per Sopinka and Iacobucci JJ
- ↑ R v Jobin, 1995 CanLII 144 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 78, per Sopinka and Iacobucci JJ
- ↑
R v N.M. Paterson & Sons Ltd., 1980 CanLII 227 (SCC), [1980] 2 SCR 679, per Chouinard J
Amway Corp, supra
Lawyers
A lawyer for an opposing party to an ongoing matter may only be called to testify where the calling party has shown a high degree of materiality and necessity.[1]
There are additional limitations on compelling Crown counsel to testify. It is only permitted where "the evidence cannot be obtained in any other way."[2]
- ↑ R v 1504413 Ontario Limited, 2008 ONCA 253 (CanLII), 230 CCC (3d) 193, per Armstrong JA, at para 17
- ↑ see Compelling Attendance of Witnesses#Quashing a Subpoena
Judges
Failure to Respond to Subpeona
Warrant of Arrest
Section 698(2) permits a judge to order a warrant of arrest for a person to attend court as a witness.
The key requirements for a 698(2) warrant consist of:
- the person is "likely to give material evidence"
- the person "will not attend in response" to an issued subpoena or is evading service of a subpoena."
There is not need for the person to be cooperative with the process server or police officer who is trying to serve them.[1]
A conclusion that the party is evading service must be "adequately support by the facts."[2]
The decision to issue a warrant under s. 698 is at the discretion of the judge and is not reviewable on certiorari.[3]
- ↑
Credit Foncier Franco-Canadien v McGuire, 1979 CanLII 366 (BC SC), 14 BCLR 281 (S.C.), per Van Der Hoop J, at para 8
- ↑ Credit Foncier Franco-Canadien, ibid., at para 8
- ↑ R v Earhart, 2007 BCCA 614 (CanLII), 272 CCC (3d) 400, per Rowles JA
Missing Witnesses
- Warrant for absconding witness
704 (1) Where a person is bound by recognizance to give evidence in any proceedings, a justice who is satisfied on information being made before him in writing and under oath that the person is about to abscond or has absconded may issue his warrant in Form 18 [forms] directing a peace officer to arrest that person and to bring him before the court, judge, justice or provincial court judge before whom he is bound to appear.
- Endorsement of warrant
(2) Section 528 [endorsing warrant] applies, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to a warrant issued under this section.
- Copy of information
(3) A person who is arrested under this section is entitled, on request, to receive a copy of the information on which the warrant for his arrest was issued.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 704; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203.
[annotation(s) added]
Whether to issue a warrant under s. 704 is at the discretion of the judge and cannot be reviewed by certiorari.[1]
- ↑
R v Earhart, 2007 BCCA 614 (CanLII), 272 CCC (3d) 400, per Rowles JA, at paras 32 to 47
Material Witness Warrant
Section 705 gives authority of a court to issue a warrant of arrest for a witness who fails to attend on a subpoena.
- Warrant if witness does not attend
705 (1) If a person who has been served with a subpoena to give evidence in a proceeding does not attend or remain in attendance, the court, judge, justice or provincial court judge before whom that person was required to attend may issue a warrant in Form 17 [forms] for the arrest of that person if it is established
- (a) that the subpoena has been served in accordance with this Part [Pt. XXII – Procuring Attendance (ss. 697 to 715.2)], and
- (b) that the person is likely to give material evidence.
- Warrant if witness bound by recognizance
(2) If a person who has been bound by a recognizance to attend to give evidence in any proceeding does not attend or does not remain in attendance, the court, judge, justice or provincial court judge before whom that person was bound to attend may issue a warrant in Form 17 [forms] for the arrest of that person.
- Warrant effective throughout Canada
(3) A warrant that is issued by a justice or provincial court judge pursuant to subsection (1) [warrant if witness does not attend] or (2) [warrant if witness bound by recognizance] may be executed anywhere in Canada.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 705; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203; 2019, c. 25, s. 286.
[annotation(s) added]
A judge has the inherent authority to order any person present in court to be compelled to testify where:
- the person has relevant evidence to give
- a party requires that person to testify in the proceeding
Similarly, an inmate witness can also be compelled to testify by way of s. 527.[1]
Where a witness fails to attend, the judge has the discretion to order a witness warrant where he is satisfied that:[2]
- proper attempts to serve the witness have been made;
- the witness is a material witness.
- ↑ R v Ayres, 1984 CanLII 3539 (ON CA), 15 CCC (3d) 208, per Goodman JA
- ↑ R v Scott, 1990 CanLII 27 (SCC), [1990] 3 SCR 979, per Cory J
Detaining Missing Witness
- Order where witness arrested under warrant
706. Where a person is brought before a court, judge, justice or provincial court judge under a warrant issued pursuant to subsection 698(2) or section 704 [warrant for absconding witness] or 705 [warrant if witness does not attend], the court, judge, justice or provincial court judge may order that the person
- (a) be detained in custody, or
- (b) be released on recognizance in Form 32 [forms], with or without sureties,
to appear and give evidence when required.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 706; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 203.
[annotation(s) added]
- Maximum period for detention of witness
707 (1) No person shall be detained in custody under the authority of any provision of this Act, for the purpose only of appearing and giving evidence when required as a witness, for any period exceeding thirty days unless prior to the expiration of those thirty days he has been brought before a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction in the province in which he is being detained.
- Application by witness to judge
(2) Where at any time prior to the expiration of the thirty days referred to in subsection (1) [maximum period for detention of witness], a witness being detained in custody as described in that subsection applies to be brought before a judge of a court described therein, the judge before whom the application is brought shall fix a time prior to the expiration of those thirty days for the hearing of the application and shall cause notice of the time so fixed to be given to the witness, the person having custody of the witness and such other persons as the judge may specify, and at the time so fixed for the hearing of the application the person having custody of the witness shall cause the witness to be brought before a judge of the court for that purpose.
- Review of detention
(3) If the judge before whom a witness is brought under this section is not satisfied that the continued detention of the witness is justified, the judge shall order them to be discharged or to be released on recognizance, with or without sureties, so that the witness will appear and give evidence when required. However, if the judge is satisfied that the continued detention of the witness is justified, the judge may order their continued detention until they do what is required of them under section 550 [recognizance of witness] or the trial is concluded, or until they appear and give evidence when required, except that the total period of detention of the witness from the time they were first detained in custody shall not in any case exceed 90 days.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 635; 2019, c. 25, s. 288.
[annotation(s) added]
Finding of Contempt
A person who is required and fails to attend or remain in attendance at court in order to give evidence is guilty of contempt, which is addressed in s. 708 of the Code.