Identity (Cases)
- < Criminal Law
- < Cases
Identification
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Banish, 2012 ABPC 350 (CanLII) |
ID in sexual assault case established by proof of IP and email address source and vehicle ownership. Victim could not visually ID assailant. | |
| R v Oliver, 2012 CanLII 38957 (NL SCTD) |
acquitted | |
| R v Wheyee, 2012 ABPC 35 (CanLII) |
acquitted | home invasion -- acquitted- thorough canvas of evidence |
| R v Colwell, 2011 ONCJ 611 (CanLII) |
acquitted | assault |
| R v Smith, 2011 BCCA 362 (CanLII) |
guilty | |
| R v Flynn, 2011 CanLII 77299 (NL PC) |
acquitted | dog tracking |
| R v McNaughton, 2011 ABPC 356 (CanLII) |
acquitted | drug trafficking -- no line up made |
| R v Wilband, 2011 ABPC 298 (CanLII) |
convicted | bank robbery |
| R v Benmore, 2011 CanLII 77762 (NL PC) |
guilty | attempted case |
| R v Pierce, 2011 BCCA 485 (CanLII) |
conviction upheld | |
| R v Al-Kisadi, 2011 ONSC 6412 (CanLII) |
acquitted | |
| R v John, 2010 ONSC 6085 (CanLII) |
acquitted | |
| R v T.(R.), 2010 ONCJ 289 (CanLII) |
||
| R v L.(W.M), 2010 BCCA 355 (CanLII) |
conviction upheld -- D argued that prior encounter by Police affected ID | |
| R v Thompson, 2009 NSPC 51 (CanLII) |
acquitted | |
| R v Martin, 2007 NSCA 121 (CanLII) |
conviction | |
| R v Hill, 2005 NSCA 108 (CanLII) |
||
| R v Goulart-Nelson, 2004 CanLII 32077 (Ont.C.A.) |
||
| R v Zurowski, 2003 ABCA 315 (CanLII) |
acquitted on appeal to SCC | |
| R v Williams [2003] O.J. No. 4095, 2003 CanLII 21327 (ON CA) |
||
| R v Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39 (CanLII) |
||
| R v Dhillon (2002), 166 CCC (3d) 262 (ONCA), 2002 CanLII 41540 |
acquitted | witness shown only one photo |
| R v Thompson 2000 CanLII 5746 (ON C.A.) |
||
| R v Wristen 1999 CanLII 3824 (ON C.A.) |
||
| R v Field 1999 BCCA 382 (CanLII), (1999), 126 BCAC 103. |
||
| R v Reitsma, 1998 CanLII 825 (S.C.C.), [1998] 1 SCR 769, rev’g (1997), 125 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA) |
||
| R v Vu [1998] BCJ No. 986 1998 CanLII 6791 |
||
| R v Vu [1997] BCJ No. 756 1997 CanLII 2864 |
||
| R v Tat and Long (1997) 117 CCC (3d) 481 1997 CanLII 2234 |
||
| R v Miaponoose, 1996 CanLII 1268 (ONCA) |
||
| R v Tam (1995), 1995 CanLII 1805 (BC CA), 100 CCC (3d) 196 (BCCA) |
||
| R v Fengstad 1994 CanLII 240 (BC C.A.), (1994), 27 C.R. (4th) 383 (BCCA) |
||
| R v Dilling, 1993 CanLII 1943 (BCCA) |
||
| R v Izzard [1990] 54 CCC (3d) 252 (*no CanLII links) |
||
| R v Quercia, 1990 CanLII 2595 (ONCA) |
||
| R v Hang 1990 CanLII 8 (BCCA), (1990), 55 CCC (3d) 195 (BCCA) |
||
| R v Virk (1983), 33 C.R. (3d) 378 (BCCA) (*no CanLII links) |
||
| R v Faryna [1982] 3 CCC (3d) 58(*no CanLII links) |
||
| R v Spatola, 1970 CanLII 390 (ON CA), [1970] 3 O.R. 74-84 |
duty to direct jury on frailties of ID | |
| R v Howarth (1970), 1 CCC (2d) 546 (Ont.C.A.)(*no CanLII links) |
||
| R v Smith 1952 CanLII 116 (ON CA), [1952] 103 CCC 58 (Ont. CA) (*no CanLII links) |
||
| R v Smierciak [1947] 2 D.L.R. 156 (*no CanLII links) |
Voice identification
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Badgerow, 2010 ONSC 937 (CanLII) |
Line-up ID
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Bear, 2012 ABCA 85 (CanLII) |
lineup ID sufficient even thought witness ID’d at 70-80% accuracy stating that it “maybe” was the accused | |
| R v Lussier, 1998 CanLII 4143 (BCCA) |
line-up conducted, accused ID'd by complainant sometime later and admitted she was not sure | |
| R v Atfield 1983 ABCA 44 (CanLII), [1983] A.J. No. 870 |
some time after sexual assault, accused was ID'd in a line-up by a "fleeting glance" eye-witness. The line up process used by the police in that case as "unacceptable, botched and farcical". |
Out of Court ID
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Basi, 2008 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
acquitted | |
| R v Moran, 2008 SKPC 33 (CanLII) |
||
| R v Meier, 2009 SKPC 29 (CanLII) |
||
| R v Bigsky, 2006 SKCA 145 (CanLII) |
||
| R v Coutu et al., 2008 MBCA 151 (CanLII) |
||
| R v Goran, 2008 ONCA 195 (CanLII) |
||
| R v Jones, 2005 CanLII 60168 (MBPC) |
||
| R v Delorme, 2004 SKPC 130 (CanLII) |
ID by Constable
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Schmidt, 2012 BCPC 247 (CanLII) | convicted | based on recognition evidence |
| R v Cranham, 2012 ONCA 457 (CanLII) | conviction quashed | |
| R v Jerry Lee Dun, 2006 PESCAD 19 (CanLII) | new trial | |
| R v Tash, 2011 ONSC 5191 (CanLII) | one officer sees person throw object away, radios second officer who sees accused matching description. Good opportunity to observe. |
Of a Driver
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Ryan, 2011 NLCA 53 (CanLII) |
convicted | - |
| R v Corsor, 2011 BCPC 212 (CanLII) |
acquittal | |
| R v Tarcisyo, 2010 SKQB 234 (CanLII) |
conviction | pull over-- driver pulls away after brief interaction with police |
| R v Desnomie, 2010 SKCA 64 (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 273 |
||
| R v Horkoff, 2010 SKCA 79 (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 332 |
conviction | |
| R v Armbruster, 2010 SKCA 25 (CanLII), [2010] 4 W.W.R. 575 |
||
| R v Weigel, 2008 SKCA 122 (CanLII), [2008] S.J. No. 603 |
||
| R v Roppel, 2006 ONCJ 445(*no CanLII links) |
guilty | officer chasing car, than foot chase. Came within an arms-length of accused. |
| R v Cover (2004), 2004 CarswellOnt 6224 (ONSC)(*no CanLII links) |
guilty | officer giving chase, made eye-contact while near driver's window, had seen driver several times in area, familiar with accused by photo on wanted bulletin. Officer ID'd accused shortly after arrest |
Video tape ID
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Leaney, [1989] 2 SCR 393 1989 CanLII 28 |