Tracking Warrants
General Principles
- Warrant for tracking device — transactions and things
492.1 (1) A justice or judge who is satisfied by information on oath that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that an offence has been or will be committed under this or any other Act of Parliament and that tracking the location of one or more transactions or the location or movement of a thing, including a vehicle, will assist in the investigation of the offence may issue a warrant authorizing a peace officer or a public officer to obtain that tracking data by means of a tracking device.
- Warrant for tracking device — individuals
(2) A justice or judge who is satisfied by information on oath that there are reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been or will be committed under this or any other Act of Parliament and that tracking an individual’s movement by identifying the location of a thing that is usually carried or worn by the individual will assist in the investigation of the offence may issue a warrant authorizing a peace officer or a public officer to obtain that tracking data by means of a tracking device.
- Scope of warrant
(3) The warrant authorizes the peace officer or public officer, or a person acting under their direction, to install, activate, use, maintain, monitor and remove the tracking device, including covertly.
- Conditions
(4) A warrant may contain any conditions that the justice or judge considers appropriate, including conditions to protect a person’s interests.
- Period of validity
(5) Subject to subsection (6), a warrant is valid for the period specified in it as long as that period ends no more than 60 days after the day on which the warrant is issued.
- Period of validity — organized crime and terrorism offence
(6) A warrant is valid for the period specified in it as long as that period ends no more than one year after the day on which the warrant is issued, if the warrant relates to
- (a) an offence under any of sections 467.11 to 467.13;
- (b) an offence committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal organization; or
- (c) a terrorism offence.
- Removal after expiry of warrant
(7) On ex parte application supported by an affidavit, the justice or judge who issued a warrant or another justice or judge who has jurisdiction to issue such warrants may authorize the covert removal of the tracking device after the expiry of the warrant under any conditions that the justice or judge considers advisable in the public interest. The authorization is valid for the period specified in it as long as that period is not more than 90 days.
- Definitions
(8) The following definitions apply in this section.
...
“data” means representations, including signs, signals or symbols, that are capable of being understood by an individual or processed by a computer system or other device.
...
“judge” means a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction or a judge of the Court of Quebec.
...
“public officer” means a public officer who is appointed or designated to administer or enforce a federal or provincial law and whose duties include the enforcement of this or any other Act of Parliament.
...
“tracking data” means data that relates to the location of a transaction, individual or thing.
...
“tracking device” means a device, including a computer program within the meaning of subsection 342.1(2), that may be used to obtain or record tracking data or to transmit it by a means of telecommunication.
1993, c. 40, s. 18; 1999, c. 5, s. 18; 2014, c. 31, s. 23.
– CCC
This section was an amendment due to case law finding that the warrantless monitoring of movements by way of a tracking device was an intrusion on the s. 8 right to privacy.[1]
The standard to be applied to authorization is one of "reasonable suspicion".[2]
- Constitutionality
The version of s. 492.1 prior to 2014 does not violate s. 8 of the Charter.[3]
- Amendments
Section 492.1 does not have retrospective application.[4]
- ↑ R v Wise, 1992 CanLII 125 (SCC), [1992] 1 SCR 527, per Cory J
- ↑
R v Scott et al, 2009 BCPC 235 (CanLII), per Bayliff J
see also Reasonable and Probable Grounds
- ↑
R v Grandison, 2016 BCSC 1712 (CanLII), per Bracken J, at para 126
- ↑
Grandison, ibid., at para 128
See Also
| ||||||||