Right of Appeal by Crown of Verdicts or Sentences for Indictable Offences

From Criminal Law Notebook
Revision as of 20:58, 21 August 2018 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderAppeals}} ==General Principles== The crown may appeal on indictable matters for the situations set out in section 676: {{Quotation| '''Right of Attorney...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

General Principles

The crown may appeal on indictable matters for the situations set out in section 676:

Right of Attorney General to appeal
676. (1) The Attorney General or counsel instructed by him for the purpose may appeal to the court of appeal

(a) against a judgment or verdict of acquittal or a verdict of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder of a trial court in proceedings by indictment on any ground of appeal that involves a question of law alone;

...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 676; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 139, c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1991, c. 43, s. 9; 1995, c. 22, s. 10, c. 42, s. 74; 1997, c. 18, s. 93; 2002, c. 13, s. 65; 2008, c. 18, s. 28; 2011, c. 5, s. 3.


– CCC

This section provides the Crown a right of appeal to an acquittal or NCR verdict on a question of law alone (676(1)(a)), a court order to quash an indictment (676(1)(b), 676(1)(c)), an order for a stay of proceedings (676(1)(c)).[1]

The meaning of "question of law alone" is no different than "question of law".[2]

The Crown has a right of appeal acquittal only on a question of law.[3] Thus, acquittals based on matters of credibility cannot be appealed.

The Crown has a "heavy onus" to overturn an acquittal, particularly on jury verdicts.[4]They are not lightly overturned.[5]

Even where there is a question of law alone, the Crown must still establish a connection between the error in law and the acquittal. The error must be "directly and concretely" related to the acquittal.[6]

There are at least four categories of cases where assessments of evidence amount to an error of law:[7]

  1. it is an error of law to make a finding of fact for which there is no supporting evidence. However, a conclusion that the trier of fact has a reasonable doubt is not a finding of fact for the purposes of this rule. Rather, it is a conclusion that the standard of persuasion beyond a reasonable doubt has not been met;
  2. the legal effect of findings of fact or of undisputed facts may give rise to an error of law;
  3. an assessment of the evidence based on a misapprehension or misdirection concerning a legal principle is an error of law; and
  4. a failure to consider all the evidence in relation to the ultimate issue of guilt or innocence is also an error of law.

Unreasonable Verdict or Miscarriage of Justice
The Crown is prohibited from appealing a verdict on the basis that it is simply "unreasonable". Thee must be an error of law that leads toit.[8]

Cases of "unreasonable verdict" or "miscarriage of justice" have little relevance to crown appeals under s. 676(1)(a) for error of law.[9]

The Courts must "avoid seizing on perceived deficiencies in a trial judge's reasons for acquittal to create a ground of unreasonable acquittal."[10]

Acquittal Verdict Includes Offences Where Other Charges Convicted

676
...
Acquittal
(2) For the purposes of this section, a judgment or verdict of acquittal includes an acquittal in respect of an offence specifically charged where the accused has, on the trial thereof, been convicted or discharged under section 730 of any other offence.
...


– CCC

  1. ↑ R v Chapman, 2016 ONCA 310 (CanLII), at para 13
  2. ↑ R v Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15 (CanLII), per Arbour J, at para 31
  3. ↑ see s. 676(1)(a)
  4. ↑ R v Samuels (J.K.), 2009 ONCA 614 (CanLII) at para 19
    R v Evans, 1993 CanLII 102 (SCC), [1993] 2 SCR 629 at p. 645 referring to a “very heavy onus”
  5. ↑ R v Sutton, 2000 SCC 50 (CanLII), [2000] 2 SCR 595 at para 2
  6. ↑ R v R.G.B., 2012 MBCA 5, 275 Man.R. (2d) 119 at para 19
  7. ↑ R. v J.M.H., 2011 SCC 45 (CanLII), [2011] 3 S.C.R. 197, at paras 25-32
  8. ↑ Biniaris, supra at para 32
  9. ↑ R v JMH 2011 SCC 45 (CanLII) at para 35
  10. ↑ R v Walker 2008 SCC 34 (CanLII) at para 2

Crown Appeal on Specific Types of Charges

Decision on Mental Health

676 (1) ...
Appeal against verdict of unfit to stand trial
(3) The Attorney General or counsel instructed by the Attorney General for the purpose may appeal to the court of appeal against a verdict that an accused is unfit to stand trial, on any ground of appeal that involves a question of law alone.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 676; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 139, c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1991, c. 43, s. 9; 1995, c. 22, s. 10, c. 42, s. 74; 1997, c. 18, s. 93; 2002, c. 13, s. 65; 2008, c. 18, s. 28; 2011, c. 5, s. 3.


– CCC

Stay of Proceedings or Quashing of Indictment

Crown Appeal of Sentence

Crown appeals of sentence for indictable offences must have leave of the court of appeal.[1]

The crown may appeal on indictable matters for the situations set out in section 676:

Right of Attorney General to appeal
676. (1) The Attorney General or counsel instructed by him for the purpose may appeal to the court of appeal

...or
(d) with leave of the court of appeal or a judge thereof, against the sentence passed by a trial court in proceedings by indictment, unless that sentence is one fixed by law.

...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 676; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 139, c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1991, c. 43, s. 9; 1995, c. 22, s. 10, c. 42, s. 74; 1997, c. 18, s. 93; 2002, c. 13, s. 65; 2008, c. 18, s. 28; 2011, c. 5, s. 3.


– CCC

  1. ↑ see s 676 (1)(d) ("with leave of the court of appeal or a judge thereof, against the sentence passed by a trial court in proceedings by indictment, unless that sentence is one fixed by law.")

Crown Appeal of Parole Ineligibility

Decision on Parole Ineligibility for Murder

676 (1) ...
Appeal against ineligible parole period
(4) The Attorney General or counsel instructed by him for the purpose may appeal to the court of appeal in respect of a conviction for second degree murder, against the number of years of imprisonment without eligibility for parole, being less than twenty-five, that has been imposed as a result of that conviction.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 676; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 139, c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1991, c. 43, s. 9; 1995, c. 22, s. 10, c. 42, s. 74; 1997, c. 18, s. 93; 2002, c. 13, s. 65; 2008, c. 18, s. 28; 2011, c. 5, s. 3.


– CCC

Decision on Delayed Parole Under s. 743.6 or 745.51

676 (1) ...
Appeal against decision not to make section 743.6 order
(5) The Attorney General or counsel instructed by the Attorney General for the purpose may appeal to the court of appeal against the decision of the court not to make an order under section 743.6 [Power of court to delay parole].
Appeal against decision not to make s. 745.51(1) order
(6) The Attorney General or counsel instructed by the Attorney General for the purpose may appeal to the court of appeal against the decision of the court not to make an order under subsection 745.51(1) [Ineligibility for parole — multiple murders].
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 676; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 139, c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1991, c. 43, s. 9; 1995, c. 22, s. 10, c. 42, s. 74; 1997, c. 18, s. 93; 2002, c. 13, s. 65; 2008, c. 18, s. 28; 2011, c. 5, s. 3.

[annotation(s) added]


– CCC

Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Right_of_Appeal_by_Crown_of_Verdicts_or_Sentences_for_Indictable_Offences&oldid=6387"