View source for Warrant Searches (Cases)

[[fr:Recherches_de_mandats_(affaires)]]
<!--
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderProcCases}}
==Generally==
{{seealso|Applications for Judicial Authorizations}}
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Mahmood|fnr5s|2011 ONCA 693 (CanLII)}}||N||-|| warrant for cell phone number log upheld
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ngo|fnsl3|2011 ONSC 6676 (CanLII)}}||N||-|| search warrant upheld on s. 8 challenge
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nguyen|flxb7|2011 ONCA 465 (CanLII)}}|| || ||search warrant challenged; no violation
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Pike|29w7k|2010 NLTD 97 (CanLII)}}
||Y||?||secured blood samples prior to warrant being issued
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nguyen|5t2v|2002 BCPC 12 (CanLII)}}
|| N||-|| search warrant executed to search house; police also searched parked car
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Nguyen and Nguyen|29l69|2010 ONSC 1520 (CanLII)}}
||Y||Y||
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Parasiris|27jmp|2008 QCCS 2460 (CanLII)}}
||Y||?||
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Darby|fps2j|2012 ABCA 27 (CanLII)}}|| |||| ITO upheld anonymous informer
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Dionisi|fprmp|2012 ABCA 20 (CanLII)}}|| |||| ITO upheld, based on anonymous informer
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Morgan|fpmhg|2012 ONCA 28 (CanLII)}}|||||| ITO found valid despite errors in affidavit
|}

==Residential Searches==

{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Afshar|274z7|2009 ABPC 368 (CanLII)}}||Y||Y|| The search warrant to find cocaine and money was founded valid. The ITO contained "conclusory statements" and the informants credibility could not be tested. Certain information was a general knowledge. Such as ownership of the vehicle and occupancy of the residence.
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Fan|fwk7p|2013 BCSC 445 (CanLII)}}||N||N|| search warrant of residence based on informer upheld
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Odette|fw5kq|2013 ONCJ 62 (CanLII)}} ||N||N|| residental search on a drug warrant
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Gobin|fw5bw|2013 ONSC 1042 (CanLII)}}||N ||N|| Police search residence for evidence of gun from a robbery.
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Watts|fqpzk|2012 ONSC 1865 (CanLII)}} ||N||N||no s.8 violation—ITO search warrant for hard entry into house looking for guns and drugs—warrant based on confidential informer—contained errors—upheld
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Dowling|fpf0d|2011 ABQB 790 (CanLII)}} || N|| N|| search warrant of house with suspicious traffic
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lee|fnng1|2011 ABCA 310 (CanLII)}}
|| || || warrant to enter home upheld
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Puskas|6hlg|1997 CanLII 1159}}
||Y||N|| Search warrant to house based on anonymous tip upheld trial level acquitted; overturned on issue of s.24(2) analysis
|}

==Wire taps==

{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Bulatci|fqxsv|2012 NWTCA 6 (CanLII)}}||Y || N||  wiretap of accused in prison violated s.8 but admissible
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Martin|2b3ls|2010 NBCA 41 (CanLII)}}||Y ||N|| 
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Della Penna|fpl3t|2012 BCCA 3 (CanLII)}}|| || || wiretap allowed on appeal
|}

==Bodily sample==
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}||Y||N||
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Emshey|2bmxc|2010 ABPC 237 (CanLII)}}||Y||N||
|}

==Computers==

{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Trapp|fp3n3|2011 SKCA 143 (CanLII)}} ||  ||||search warrant for ISP seeking account info attached to IP address upheld
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lo|fnpzl|2011 ONSC 6532 (CanLII)}} || ||||no s.8 violation—production order by police was validly granted for login records of Facebook account
|-
|}

==Leave to Cross-Examine Affiant==
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"
|-
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lao et al|fwwzt|2013 ONSC 1951 (CanLII)}} || leave denied
|}

[[Category:Warrant Searches]]
[[Category:Search and Seizure Case Digests]]

-->