Probation Orders: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - " (Que. C.A.)" to "" |
m Text replacement - "\{\{Fr\|([^\}\}]+)\}\}" to "Fr:$1" |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Fr:Ordonnances_de_probation]] | |||
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderProbation}} | {{LevelZero}}{{HeaderProbation}} | ||
{{Currency2|January|2020}} | |||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
; Purpose | |||
An order of probation's primary purpose is to influence the future behaviour of the offender.<ref> | An order of probation's primary purpose is to influence the future behaviour of the offender.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Taylor|1mcwg|1997 CanLII 9813 (SK CA)|122 CCC (3d) 376}}{{perSKCA|Bayda CJ}} ("Apart from the wording of the provision, the innate character of a probation order is such that it seeks to influence the future behaviour of the offender. More specifically, it seeks to secure “the good conduct” of the offender and to deter him from committing other offences.")<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Kootenay|5rp3|2000 ABCA 289 (CanLII)|150 CCC (3d) 311}}{{TheCourtABCA}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Probation is "a rehabilitative sentencing tool...It is not considered punitive in nature.” | Probation is "a rehabilitative sentencing tool...It is not considered punitive in nature.” | ||
<ref> | <ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Rawn|frzp0|2012 ONCA 487 (CanLII)|294 OAC 261}}{{perONCA|Epstein JA}}{{atL|frzp0|35}}<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Rawn|frzp0|2012 ONCA 487 (CanLII)|294 OAC 261}}{{perONCA|Epstein JA}}{{atL|frzp0|35}}<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Goeujon|1nd90|2006 BCCA 261 (CanLII)|209 CCC (3d) 61}}{{perBCCA|Ryan JA}}{{atL|1nd90|49}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Proulx|527b|2000 SCC 5 (CanLII)|[2000] 1 SCR 61}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}{{atL|527b|32}}<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Proulx|527b|2000 SCC 5 (CanLII)|[2000] 1 SCR 61}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}{{atL|527b|32}}<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Duguay|hxj1q|2019 BCCA 53 (CanLII)|372 CCC (3d) 175}}{{perBCCA|Fitch JA}}{{atL|hxj1q|60}}<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRx|Walsh|hsd6x|2018 BCCA 222 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Griffin JA}} (a probation order acts “as a tool to assist in the rehabilitation” of offenders)<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
It does not seek to reflect the seriousness of the offence or the offender's degree of culpability.<ref> | It does not seek to reflect the seriousness of the offence or the offender's degree of culpability.<ref> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 27: | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
The order may be used to deter the offender from committing future offences and ensure "good conduct" | The order may be used to deter the offender from committing future offences and ensure "good conduct."<ref> | ||
{{supra1|Taylor}} at p. 394 ("...the innate character of a probation order is such that it seeks to influence the future behaviour of the offender. More specifically, it seeks to secure “the good conduct” of the offender and to deter him from committing other offences.")<br> | {{supra1|Taylor}} at p. 394 ("...the innate character of a probation order is such that it seeks to influence the future behaviour of the offender. More specifically, it seeks to secure “the good conduct” of the offender and to deter him from committing other offences.")<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 33: | ||
; Punishment in Effect Not Purpose | ; Punishment in Effect Not Purpose | ||
A probation order is not considered appropriate to achieve the goals of denunciation and deterrence.<ref> | A probation order is not considered appropriate to achieve the goals of denunciation and deterrence.<ref> | ||
See {{ | See {{CanLIIRP|Dunn|flqsf|2011 NBCA 19 (CanLII)|274 CCC (3d) 77}}{{perNBCA|Richard JA}}<br> | ||
{{supra1|Taylor}}<br> | {{supra1|Taylor}}<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Voong|gjnwp|2015 BCCA 285 (CanLII)|325 CCC (3d) 267}}{{perBCCA|Bennett JA}}{{atL|gjnwp|37}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
It may have punitive effects or aspects, including the restrictions of liberty.<ref> | It may have punitive effects or aspects, including the restrictions of liberty.<ref> | ||
{{supra1|Dugay}}{{atsL|hxj1q|60| to 61}}<br> | {{supra1|Dugay}}{{atsL|hxj1q|60| to 61}}<br> | ||
{{supra1|Taylor}}{{Atp|394}} ("Depending upon the specific conditions of the order there may well be a punitive aspect to a probation order but punishment is not the dominant or an inherent purpose.") | {{supra1|Taylor}}{{Atp|394}} ("Depending upon the specific conditions of the order there may well be a punitive aspect to a probation order but punishment is not the dominant or an inherent purpose.") | ||
</ref> | |||
A condition may have a deterrent or denunciatory effect, but such conditions can only be imposed if there is a "nexus between the condition and the offender, the protection of the community and the offender's reintegration into the community."<ref> | |||
{{CanLIIRP|Bosco|gn7j3|2016 BCCA 55 (CanLII)|95 MVR (6th) 9}}{{perBCCA|Dickson JA}}{{atL|gn7j3|55}} (“when a probation order is made its conditions need not be limited to rehabilitative objectives and may have deterrent and denunciatory effects which are punitive...However, such conditions can only be imposed if there is a nexus between the condition and the offender, the protection of the community and the offender's reintegration into the community. While a condition may serve one or both goals of protecting society and facilitating reintegration, if imposed solely to punish the offender it will lack the requisite nexus. Without the requisite nexus, a probation condition, punitive or otherwise, cannot be imposed lawfully”)<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
A probation order imposed as a form of punishment rather than rehabilitation may be struck down.<ref> | A probation order imposed as a form of punishment rather than rehabilitation may be struck down.<ref> | ||
{{supra1|Proulx}}{{atL|527b|33}}<br> | {{supra1|Proulx}}{{atL|527b|33}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Ziatas|hv020|1973 CanLII 1413 (ON CA)|13 CCC (2d) 287 | {{CanLIIRP|Ziatas|hv020|1973 CanLII 1413 (ON CA)|13 CCC (2d) 287}}{{perONCA-H|Martin JA}} at p. 288<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Caja|hv11b|1977 CanLII 2050 (ON CA)|36 CCC (2d) 401 | {{CanLIIRP|Caja|hv11b|1977 CanLII 2050 (ON CA)|36 CCC (2d) 401}}{{perONCA|Houlden JA}}{{Atps|402-403}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Lavender|23lxl|1981 CanLII 334 (BCCA)|59 CCC (2d) 551 (BCCA)}}{{perBCCA|Nemetz CJ}}{{Atps|551-53}}<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Lavender|23lxl|1981 CanLII 334 (BCCA)|59 CCC (2d) 551 (BCCA)}}{{perBCCA|Nemetz CJ}}{{Atps|551-53}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|L|2djv5|1986 ABCA 83 (CanLII)| | {{CanLIIRP|L|2djv5|1986 ABCA 83 (CanLII)|50 CR (3d) 398}}{{perABCA|Laycraft JA}}{{Atps|339-400}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; Probation Close in Time to Offence | ; Probation Close in Time to Offence | ||
A probation order that comes into force years after its imposition may generally lack any meaningful rehabilitative purpose.<ref> | A probation order that comes into force years after its imposition may generally lack any meaningful rehabilitative purpose.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Knott|fs68p|2012 SCC 42 (CanLII)|[2012] 2 SCR 470}}{{perSCC|Fish J}}{{atsL|fs68p|64| to 65}} ("A probation order that was appropriate when made may well be rendered inappropriate by a lengthy intervening term of imprisonment. ..., where a probation order will not come into force for many years after its imposition, or where the total period of incarceration is extended to the point that the offender will be subject to a lengthy period of community supervision while on parole or statutory release, a probation order will generally lack a meaningful rehabilitative purpose.")<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Knott|fs68p|2012 SCC 42 (CanLII)|[2012] 2 SCR 470}}{{perSCC-H|Fish J}}{{atsL|fs68p|64| to 65}} ("A probation order that was appropriate when made may well be rendered inappropriate by a lengthy intervening term of imprisonment. ..., where a probation order will not come into force for many years after its imposition, or where the total period of incarceration is extended to the point that the offender will be subject to a lengthy period of community supervision while on parole or statutory release, a probation order will generally lack a meaningful rehabilitative purpose.")<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 72: | Line 79: | ||
{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 297. | {{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 297. | ||
{{Annotation}} | {{Annotation}} | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|732.1}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|732.1|4}} | |{{NoteUp|732.1|4}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 103: | Line 110: | ||
{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 297. | {{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 297. | ||
{{Annotation}} | {{Annotation}} | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|732.1}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|732.1|5|6}} | |{{NoteUp|732.1|5|6}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 120: | Line 127: | ||
They cannot, however, be combined. There cannot be fine and suspended sentence.<ref> | They cannot, however, be combined. There cannot be fine and suspended sentence.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Kelly|2f0zl|1995 CanLII 9854 (NL CA)|104 CCC (3d) 95}}{{perNLCA|Gushue JA}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 136: | Line 143: | ||
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 731; {{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 1}}, s. 58, c. 20, s. 200; {{LegHistory90s|1995, c. 22}}, s. 6; {{LegHistory90s|1997, c. 17}}, s. 1. | R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 731; {{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 1}}, s. 58, c. 20, s. 200; {{LegHistory90s|1995, c. 22}}, s. 6; {{LegHistory90s|1997, c. 17}}, s. 1. | ||
{{Annotation}} | {{Annotation}} | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|731}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|731|1|2}} | |{{NoteUp|731|1|2}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 143: | Line 150: | ||
Probation should not be imposed where it is impractical to make use of probation.<ref> | Probation should not be imposed where it is impractical to make use of probation.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRx|Cameron|fnrvq|2011 ABCA 311 (CanLII)}}{{perABCA|Martin JA}} - Probation was removed from sentence on appeal where the offender was working in remote area far from any probation office</ref> | ||
A probation order cannot be made where the global sentence of imprisonment is greater than two years.<ref> | A probation order cannot be made where the global sentence of imprisonment is greater than two years.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Kohl|22tj5|2009 ONCA 254 (CanLII)|244 CCC (3d) 124}}{{perONCA|Armstrong JA}} - probation struck after appeal court sentenced offender to two years and probation while the accused was already serving 5 year sentence | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Where the sentence is greater than two years | ; When remand credit reduces sentence | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Mathieu|1wqth|2008 SCC 21 (CanLII)|[2008] 1 SCR 723}}{{perSCC|Fish J}} | Where the calculated sentence is greater than two years before remand credit brings it under two years, probation may be ordered.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Mathieu|1wqth|2008 SCC 21 (CanLII)|[2008] 1 SCR 723}}{{perSCC-H|Fish J}}{{atsL|1wqth|6|to 7}} | |||
</ref> | |||
This follows from the principle that a sentence, subject to some exception, begins the day it is ordered.<ref> | |||
{{CanLIIR|DN|jzvf8|2023 ONCA 561 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Simmons JA}}{{atL|jzvf8|122}} | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 161: | Line 172: | ||
A judge may not suspend sentence and order a fine for the same charge.<ref> | A judge may not suspend sentence and order a fine for the same charge.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Kelly|2f0zl|1995 CanLII 9854 (NL CA)|104 CCC (3d) 95}}{{perNLCA|Gushue JA}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
The passing of a suspended sentence is not considered a "punishment" | The passing of a suspended sentence is not considered a "punishment."<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Johnson|gbdf8|1972 CanLII 1257 (BCCA)|6 CCC (2d) 380 | {{CanLIIRP|Johnson|gbdf8|1972 CanLII 1257 (BCCA)|6 CCC (2d) 380}}{{perBCCA|Bull JA}}{{atp|382}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
However, the possibility of a revocation of the suspension is possible there is some suggestion that it provides "deterrent value" | However, the possibility of a revocation of the suspension is possible there is some suggestion that it provides "deterrent value."<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|McGill|gnq5r|2016 ONCJ 138 (CanLII)|OJ No 1346}}{{perONCJ|M Green J}}{{atL|gnq5r|51}}<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Voong|gjnwp|2015 BCCA 285 (CanLII)|325 CCC (3d) 267}}{{perBCCA|Bennett JA}}{{atL|gjnwp|39}} ("Because a breach of the probation order can result in a revocation and sentencing on the original offence, it has been referred to as the "Sword of Damocles" hanging over the offender's head. ")<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Scott|1mn01|1996 CanLII 5297 (NS CA)|442 APR 93}}{{perNSCA-H|Pugsley JA}} ("I agree with counsel's submission and add that the approach of the sentencing judge, in addition, ignored the deterrent effect of a suspended sentence, implying that deterrence could only be reflected in a custodial sentence.")<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
It has been suggested that a suspended sentence provides a more onerous sentence as it is possible to serve a full jail sentence even after completing most of the probationary term.<Ref> | It has been suggested that a suspended sentence provides a more onerous sentence as it is possible to serve a full jail sentence even after completing most of the probationary term.<Ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|CGJ|j36h5|2019 BCPC 252 (CanLII)|[2019] BCJ No 2097}}{{perBCPC|MacCarthy J}}{{atL|j36h5|99}} ("...a suspended sentence can conceivably be more onerous than a sentence involving immediate imprisonment. Such might be the case if an offender were to breach in the last month of the probationary period and thus be exposed to serving the full term appropriate for the offence of which he was convicted, notwithstanding he had virtually completed the terms of his probation satisfactorily.")<br> | {{CanLIIRP|CGJ|j36h5|2019 BCPC 252 (CanLII)|[2019] BCJ No 2097}}{{perBCPC|MacCarthy J}}{{atL|j36h5|99}} ("...a suspended sentence can conceivably be more onerous than a sentence involving immediate imprisonment. Such might be the case if an offender were to breach in the last month of the probationary period and thus be exposed to serving the full term appropriate for the offence of which he was convicted, notwithstanding he had virtually completed the terms of his probation satisfactorily.")<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Hudson||1967 CanLII 144 (ON CA)|2 CCC 43}}{{perONCA-H|Kelly JA}}{{AtL||11 | {{CanLIIRP|Hudson|g1k7l|1967 CanLII 144 (ON CA)|2 CCC 43}}{{perONCA-H|Kelly JA}}{{AtL|g1k7l|11}}<Br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 202: | Line 213: | ||
{{LegHistory00s|2004, c. 12}}, s. 12(E). | {{LegHistory00s|2004, c. 12}}, s. 12(E). | ||
{{Annotation}} | {{Annotation}} | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|732.2}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|732.2|5}} | |{{NoteUp|732.2|5}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Any revocation of a suspended sentence must be made before the original sentencing judge.<ref> | Any revocation of a suspended sentence must be made before the original sentencing judge.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Graham|htz49|1975 CanLII 1268|, 27 CCC (2d) 475 | {{CanLIIRP|Graham|htz49|1975 CanLII 1268|, 27 CCC (2d) 475}}{{perONCA|MacKinnon JA}}<br> | ||
see generally {{ | see generally {{CanLIIRP|Blanchard|26smb|2009 YKCA 15 (CanLII)|249 CCC (3d) 62}}{{perYKCA|Huddart JA}}</ref> | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
| Line 215: | Line 226: | ||
The length of sentence is considered going forward from the date of sentence and not the global sentence before subtracting remand credit.<ref> | The length of sentence is considered going forward from the date of sentence and not the global sentence before subtracting remand credit.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Mathieu|1wqth|2008 SCC 21 (CanLII)|[2008] 1 SCR 723}}{{perSCC-H|Fish J}}<br> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Goeujon|1nd90|2006 BCCA 261 (CanLII)|209 CCC (3d) 61}}{{perBCCA|Ryan JA}}</ref> | ||
Probation can be ordered with a fine ''or'' prison, but it cannot be all three.<ref> | Probation can be ordered with a fine ''or'' prison, but it cannot be all three.<ref> | ||
| Line 226: | Line 237: | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
However, a prison sentence for default on the fine is permissible.<ref> | However, a prison sentence for default on the fine is permissible.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRP|Ukrainetz|1mdkk|1995 CanLII 3928 (SK CA)|39 CR (4th) 373}}{{perSKCA|Jackson JA}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Also, where the prison sentence is intermittent along with a fine, the court must order probation for the duration in which the offender is not imprisoned.<ref> | Also, where the prison sentence is intermittent along with a fine, the court must order probation for the duration in which the offender is not imprisoned.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRPC|R c Cartier|1pjbr|1990 CanLII 3388 (QC CA)|57 CCC (3d) 569}}{{TheCourtQCCA}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; Consecutive Sentences Over 2 years | ; Consecutive Sentences Over 2 years | ||
A probation attached to a jail sentence of under 2 years will continue in effect if the accused is subsequently sentenced to a further consecutive jail term that, in combination with the original jail sentence, equals a term of 2 years or more.<ref> | A probation attached to a jail sentence of under 2 years will continue in effect if the accused is subsequently sentenced to a further consecutive jail term that, in combination with the original jail sentence, equals a term of 2 years or more.<ref> | ||
{{ | {{CanLIIRx|Conway|1x6s4|2008 ONCJ 270 (CanLII)}}{{perONCJ|Douglas J}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 259: | Line 270: | ||
{{LegHistory00s|2004, c. 12}}, s. 12(E). | {{LegHistory00s|2004, c. 12}}, s. 12(E). | ||
{{Annotation}} | {{Annotation}} | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|732.2}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|732.2|1|2}} | |{{NoteUp|732.2|1|2}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 296: | Line 307: | ||
{{LegHistory90s|1999, c. 5}}, s. 32. | {{LegHistory90s|1999, c. 5}}, s. 32. | ||
{{Annotation}} | {{Annotation}} | ||
| | |{{CCCSec2|733}} | ||
|{{NoteUp|733|1|1.1|2}} | |{{NoteUp|733|1|1.1|2}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:08, 23 July 2024
- < Sentencing
- < Available Sentences
- < Probation
| This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 95793) |
General Principles
- Purpose
An order of probation's primary purpose is to influence the future behaviour of the offender.[1] Probation is "a rehabilitative sentencing tool...It is not considered punitive in nature.” [2] It does not seek to reflect the seriousness of the offence or the offender's degree of culpability.[3]
The orders are designed to "reintegrate offenders into the community" as well as protect the public.[4]
The order may be used to deter the offender from committing future offences and ensure "good conduct."[5]
- Punishment in Effect Not Purpose
A probation order is not considered appropriate to achieve the goals of denunciation and deterrence.[6] It may have punitive effects or aspects, including the restrictions of liberty.[7] A condition may have a deterrent or denunciatory effect, but such conditions can only be imposed if there is a "nexus between the condition and the offender, the protection of the community and the offender's reintegration into the community."[8]
A probation order imposed as a form of punishment rather than rehabilitation may be struck down.[9]
- Probation Close in Time to Offence
A probation order that comes into force years after its imposition may generally lack any meaningful rehabilitative purpose.[10]
- ↑
R v Taylor, 1997 CanLII 9813 (SK CA), 122 CCC (3d) 376, per Bayda CJ ("Apart from the wording of the provision, the innate character of a probation order is such that it seeks to influence the future behaviour of the offender. More specifically, it seeks to secure “the good conduct” of the offender and to deter him from committing other offences.")
R v Kootenay, 2000 ABCA 289 (CanLII), 150 CCC (3d) 311, per curiam
- ↑
R v Rawn, 2012 ONCA 487 (CanLII), 294 OAC 261, per Epstein JA, at para 35
R v Goeujon, 2006 BCCA 261 (CanLII), 209 CCC (3d) 61, per Ryan JA, at para 49
R v Proulx, 2000 SCC 5 (CanLII), [2000] 1 SCR 61, per Lamer CJ, at para 32
R v Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53 (CanLII), 372 CCC (3d) 175, per Fitch JA, at para 60
R v Walsh, 2018 BCCA 222 (CanLII), per Griffin JA (a probation order acts “as a tool to assist in the rehabilitation” of offenders)
- ↑
Taylor, supra at p. 394 ("It does not particularly seek to reflect the seriousness of the offence or the offender’s degree of culpability. Nor does it particularly seek to fill the need for denunciation of the offence or the general deterrence of others to commit the same or other offences.")
Kootenay, supra
- ↑ Dugay, supra, at para 61 Walsh, supra, at para 37(it is seen "as a tool to assist in the protection of society")
- ↑
Taylor, supra at p. 394 ("...the innate character of a probation order is such that it seeks to influence the future behaviour of the offender. More specifically, it seeks to secure “the good conduct” of the offender and to deter him from committing other offences.")
- ↑
See R v Dunn, 2011 NBCA 19 (CanLII), 274 CCC (3d) 77, per Richard JA
Taylor, supra
R v Voong, 2015 BCCA 285 (CanLII), 325 CCC (3d) 267, per Bennett JA, at para 37
- ↑
Dugay, supra, at paras 60 to 61
Taylor, supra, at p. 394 ("Depending upon the specific conditions of the order there may well be a punitive aspect to a probation order but punishment is not the dominant or an inherent purpose.") - ↑
R v Bosco, 2016 BCCA 55 (CanLII), 95 MVR (6th) 9, per Dickson JA, at para 55 (“when a probation order is made its conditions need not be limited to rehabilitative objectives and may have deterrent and denunciatory effects which are punitive...However, such conditions can only be imposed if there is a nexus between the condition and the offender, the protection of the community and the offender's reintegration into the community. While a condition may serve one or both goals of protecting society and facilitating reintegration, if imposed solely to punish the offender it will lack the requisite nexus. Without the requisite nexus, a probation condition, punitive or otherwise, cannot be imposed lawfully”)
- ↑
Proulx, supra, at para 33
R v Ziatas, 1973 CanLII 1413 (ON CA), 13 CCC (2d) 287, per Martin JA at p. 288
R v Caja, 1977 CanLII 2050 (ON CA), 36 CCC (2d) 401, per Houlden JA, at pp. 402-403
R v Lavender, 1981 CanLII 334 (BCCA), 59 CCC (2d) 551 (BCCA), per Nemetz CJ, at pp. 551-53
R v L, 1986 ABCA 83 (CanLII), 50 CR (3d) 398, per Laycraft JA, at pp. 339-400
- ↑
R v Knott, 2012 SCC 42 (CanLII), [2012] 2 SCR 470, per Fish J, at paras 64 to 65 ("A probation order that was appropriate when made may well be rendered inappropriate by a lengthy intervening term of imprisonment. ..., where a probation order will not come into force for many years after its imposition, or where the total period of incarceration is extended to the point that the offender will be subject to a lengthy period of community supervision while on parole or statutory release, a probation order will generally lack a meaningful rehabilitative purpose.")
Form of Order
A probation order should conform to Form 46. It should contain the duration of the order.:
732.1
[omitted (1), (2), (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1) and (3.2)]
- Form and period of order
(4) A probation order may be in Form 46 [forms], and the court that makes the probation order shall specify therein the period for which it is to remain in force.
[omitted (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12)]
1995, c. 22, s. 6; 1999, c. 32, s. 6(Preamble); 2003, c. 21, s. 18; 2008, c. 18, s. 37; 2011, c. 7, s. 3; 2014, c. 21, s. 2; 2015, c. 13, s. 27; 2018, c. 21, s. 24(F); 2019, c. 25, s. 297.
[annotation(s) added]
Procedure
When the court makes a probation order, the court must follow s. 732.1(5) which states:
732.1
[omitted (1), (2), (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2) and (4)]
- Obligations of court
(5) The court that makes a probation order shall
- (a) cause a copy of the order to be given to the offender;
- (b) explain the conditions of the order set under subsections (2) to (3.1) [mandatory and optional conditions for probation orders] and the substance of section 733.1 [breach of probation order] to the offender;
- (c) cause an explanation to be given to the offender of the procedure for applying under subsection 732.2(3) [probation order – changes to order] for a change to the optional conditions and of the substance of subsections 732.2(3) [probation order – changes to order] and (5) [vary or cancel probation order on breach conviction]; and
- (d) take reasonable measures to ensure that the offender understands the order and the explanations.
- For greater certainty
(6) For greater certainty, a failure to comply with subsection (5) [probation order – procedural obligation of court] does not affect the validity of the probation order.
[omitted (7), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12)]
1995, c. 22, s. 6; 1999, c. 32, s. 6(Preamble); 2003, c. 21, s. 18; 2008, c. 18, s. 37; 2011, c. 7, s. 3; 2014, c. 21, s. 2; 2015, c. 13, s. 27; 2018, c. 21, s. 24(F); 2019, c. 25, s. 297.
[annotation(s) added]
According to s. 732.1(6), a failure to comply with s. 732.1(5) does not invalidate the probation order.
When Probation can be Ordered
A probation order can be made where it is attached to one of the following orders:
- suspended sentence
- discharge order
- prison sentence is 2 years or less
- fine order
They cannot, however, be combined. There cannot be fine and suspended sentence.[1]
The enabling provision, s. 731, states:
- Making of probation order
731 (1) Where a person is convicted of an offence, a court may, having regard to the age and character of the offender, the nature of the offence and the circumstances surrounding its commission,
- (a) if no minimum punishment is prescribed by law, suspend the passing of sentence and direct that the offender be released on the conditions prescribed in a probation order;
- (b) in addition to fining or sentencing the offender to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, direct that the offender comply with the conditions prescribed in a probation order.
- Idem
(2) A court may also make a probation order where it discharges an accused under subsection 730(1) [order of discharge].
(3.1) [Repealed, 1997, c. 17, s. 1]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 731; 1992, c. 1, s. 58, c. 20, s. 200; 1995, c. 22, s. 6; 1997, c. 17, s. 1.
[annotation(s) added]
The period of probation cannot be greater than three years.
Probation should not be imposed where it is impractical to make use of probation.[2]
A probation order cannot be made where the global sentence of imprisonment is greater than two years.[3]
- When remand credit reduces sentence
Where the calculated sentence is greater than two years before remand credit brings it under two years, probation may be ordered.[4] This follows from the principle that a sentence, subject to some exception, begins the day it is ordered.[5]
- ↑ R v Kelly, 1995 CanLII 9854 (NL CA), 104 CCC (3d) 95, per Gushue JA
- ↑ R v Cameron, 2011 ABCA 311 (CanLII), per Martin JA - Probation was removed from sentence on appeal where the offender was working in remote area far from any probation office
- ↑ R v Kohl, 2009 ONCA 254 (CanLII), 244 CCC (3d) 124, per Armstrong JA - probation struck after appeal court sentenced offender to two years and probation while the accused was already serving 5 year sentence
- ↑ R v Mathieu, 2008 SCC 21 (CanLII), [2008] 1 SCR 723, per Fish J, at paras 6to 7
- ↑ R v DN, 2023 ONCA 561 (CanLII), per Simmons JA, at para 122
Challenging Validity and Rule Against Collateral Attack
Suspending of Sentence
Under s. 731(1)(a), a court may order that the sentence be suspended and the offender be placed on a period of probation.[1]
A judge may not suspend sentence and order a fine for the same charge.[2]
The passing of a suspended sentence is not considered a "punishment."[3] However, the possibility of a revocation of the suspension is possible there is some suggestion that it provides "deterrent value."[4] It has been suggested that a suspended sentence provides a more onerous sentence as it is possible to serve a full jail sentence even after completing most of the probationary term.[5] </ref>
- ↑ see above
- ↑ R v Kelly, 1995 CanLII 9854 (NL CA), 104 CCC (3d) 95, per Gushue JA
- ↑ R v Johnson, 1972 CanLII 1257 (BCCA), 6 CCC (2d) 380, per Bull JA, at p. 382
- ↑
R v McGill, 2016 ONCJ 138 (CanLII), OJ No 1346, per M Green J, at para 51
R v Voong, 2015 BCCA 285 (CanLII), 325 CCC (3d) 267, per Bennett JA, at para 39 ("Because a breach of the probation order can result in a revocation and sentencing on the original offence, it has been referred to as the "Sword of Damocles" hanging over the offender's head. ")
R v Scott, 1996 CanLII 5297 (NS CA), 442 APR 93, per Pugsley JA ("I agree with counsel's submission and add that the approach of the sentencing judge, in addition, ignored the deterrent effect of a suspended sentence, implying that deterrence could only be reflected in a custodial sentence.")
- ↑
R v CGJ, 2019 BCPC 252 (CanLII), [2019] BCJ No 2097, per MacCarthy J, at para 99 ("...a suspended sentence can conceivably be more onerous than a sentence involving immediate imprisonment. Such might be the case if an offender were to breach in the last month of the probationary period and thus be exposed to serving the full term appropriate for the offence of which he was convicted, notwithstanding he had virtually completed the terms of his probation satisfactorily.")
R v Hudson, 1967 CanLII 144 (ON CA), 2 CCC 43, per Kelly JA, at para 11
Revoking a Suspended Sentence
Under s. 732.2(5)(d), a court may revoke the suspension of sentence:
732.2
[omitted (1), (2), (3) and (4)]
- Where person convicted of offence
(5) Where an offender who is bound by a probation order is convicted of an offence, including an offence under section 733.1 [breach of probation order], and
- (a) the time within which an appeal may be taken against that conviction has expired and the offender has not taken an appeal,
- (b) the offender has taken an appeal against that conviction and the appeal has been dismissed, or
- (c) the offender has given written notice to the court that convicted the offender that the offender elects not to appeal the conviction or has abandoned the appeal, as the case may be,
in addition to any punishment that may be imposed for that offence, the court that made the probation order may, on application by the prosecutor, require the offender to appear before it and, after hearing the prosecutor and the offender,
- (d) where the probation order was made under paragraph 731(1)(a) [order suspending sentence and release offender], revoke the order and impose any sentence that could have been imposed if the passing of sentence had not been suspended, or
- (e) make such changes to the optional conditions as the court deems desirable, or extend the period for which the order is to remain in force for such period, not exceeding one year, as the court deems desirable,
and the court shall thereupon endorse the probation order accordingly and, if it changes the optional conditions or extends the period for which the order is to remain in force, inform the offender of its action and give the offender a copy of the order so endorsed.
[omitted (6)]
1995, c. 22, s. 6; 2004, c. 12, s. 12(E).
[annotation(s) added]
Any revocation of a suspended sentence must be made before the original sentencing judge.[1]
- ↑
R v Graham, 1975 CanLII 1268, , 27 CCC (2d) 475, per MacKinnon JA
see generally R v Blanchard, 2009 YKCA 15 (CanLII), 249 CCC (3d) 62, per Huddart JA
Prison or Fine with Probation
Section 731(1)(b) permits a probation order when it is attached to a sentence of imprisonment of less than 2 years.
The length of sentence is considered going forward from the date of sentence and not the global sentence before subtracting remand credit.[1]
Probation can be ordered with a fine or prison, but it cannot be all three.[2] However, a prison sentence for default on the fine is permissible.[3]
Also, where the prison sentence is intermittent along with a fine, the court must order probation for the duration in which the offender is not imprisoned.[4]
- Consecutive Sentences Over 2 years
A probation attached to a jail sentence of under 2 years will continue in effect if the accused is subsequently sentenced to a further consecutive jail term that, in combination with the original jail sentence, equals a term of 2 years or more.[5]
- ↑
R v Mathieu, 2008 SCC 21 (CanLII), [2008] 1 SCR 723, per Fish J
R v Goeujon, 2006 BCCA 261 (CanLII), 209 CCC (3d) 61, per Ryan JA - ↑
R v Smith, 1972 CanLII 1455 (NWT TC), 7 CCC (2d) 468 (NWTC), per Morrow J, at p. 470
R v St. James (1981), 20 CR (3d) 389(*no CanLII links)
R v Shimout, [1985] N.W.T.R. 118 (N.W.T.S.C.)(*no CanLII links)
R v Kavanagh, 1988 CanLII 4927 (SKQB), 69 Sask.R. 188 (Q.B), per Hrabinsky J
R v Biron, 1991 CanLII 3911 (QC CA), 65 CCC 221, per Rothman JA
- ↑ R v Ukrainetz, 1995 CanLII 3928 (SK CA), 39 CR (4th) 373, per Jackson JA
- ↑ R c Cartier, 1990 CanLII 3388 (QC CA), 57 CCC (3d) 569, per curiam
- ↑ R v Conway, 2008 ONCJ 270 (CanLII), per Douglas J
Commencement and Duration of Order
Section 732.2 governs when a probation order will come into effect and the duration:
- Coming into force of order
732.2 (1) A probation order comes into force
- (a) on the date on which the order is made;
- (b) where the offender is sentenced to imprisonment under paragraph 731(1)(b) [imposition of conditions] or was previously sentenced to imprisonment for another offence, as soon as the offender is released from prison or, if released from prison on conditional release, at the expiration of the sentence of imprisonment; or
- (c) where the offender is under a conditional sentence order, at the expiration of the conditional sentence order.
- Duration of order and limit on term of order
(2) Subject to subsection (5) [vary or cancel probation order on breach conviction],
- (a) where an offender who is bound by a probation order is convicted of an offence, including an offence under section 733.1 [breach of probation order], or is imprisoned under paragraph 731(1)(b) [imposition of conditions] in default of payment of a fine, the order continues in force except in so far as the sentence renders it impossible for the offender for the time being to comply with the order; and
- (b) no probation order shall continue in force for more than three years after the date on which the order came into force.
[omitted (3), (4), (5) and (6)]
1995, c. 22, s. 6; 2004, c. 12, s. 12(E).
[annotation(s) added]
Section 732.1(4) requires that the probation order contain the duration of the order.
- No Consecutive Order
Multiple probation orders cannot be ordered to be applied consecutively.[1]
- ↑ R v Hunt, 1982 CanLII 3716 (NSCA), 2 CCC (2d) 126, per MacDonald JA
Terms of Probation
Variation of Probationary Terms
Transfer of Order
- Transfer of order
733 (1) Where an offender who is bound by a probation order becomes a resident of, or is convicted or discharged under section 730 of an offence including an offence under section 733.1 [breach of probation order] in, a territorial division other than the territorial division where the order was made, on the application of a probation officer, the court that made the order may, subject to subsection (1.1) [transfer of probation order – AG's consent], transfer the order to a court in that other territorial division that would, having regard to the mode of trial of the offender, have had jurisdiction to make the order in that other territorial division if the offender had been tried and convicted there of the offence in respect of which the order was made, and the order may thereafter be dealt with and enforced by the court to which it is so transferred in all respects as if that court had made the order.
- Attorney General’s consent
(1.1) The transfer may be granted only with
- (a) the consent of the Attorney General of the province in which the probation order was made, if the two territorial divisions are not in the same province; or
- (b) the consent of the Attorney General of Canada, if the proceedings that led to the issuance of the probation order were instituted by or on behalf of the Attorney General of Canada.
- Where court unable to act
(2) Where a court that has made a probation order or to which a probation order has been transferred pursuant to subsection (1) [transfer of probation order] is for any reason unable to act, the powers of that court in relation to the probation order may be exercised by any other court that has equivalent jurisdiction in the same province.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 733; R.S., 1985, c. 24 (2nd Supp.), s. 46; 1995, c. 22, s. 6; 1999, c. 5, s. 32.
[annotation(s) added]
Young Offenders
Appeals
Under s. 683(5), the Court of Appeal may suspend certain sentencing orders, including a probation order, while an appeal is pending.[1]