Voyeurism (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{SCase1|R v D.W.1,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gx7cl 2016 ONCJ 772] (CanLII){{perONCJ|West J}} | | }} | {{SCase1|R v D.W.1,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gx7cl 2016 ONCJ 772] (CanLII){{perONCJ|West J}} | | }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v McDonald, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gs4k0 2016 QCCQ 5288] (CanLII){{perQCCQ| | {{SCase1|R v McDonald, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gs4k0 2016 QCCQ 5288] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|bBaulieu J}} | {{DischargeC}} | }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Cyr, [http://canlii.ca/t/gg0zr 2015 QCCQ 196] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Daoust J}} |{{jailM|12}} w {{probationM|12}} | }} | {{SCase1|R v Cyr, [http://canlii.ca/t/gg0zr 2015 QCCQ 196] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Daoust J}} |{{jailM|12}} w {{probationM|12}} | }} | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
{{SCase1|R c GC,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnt1n 2011 QCCQ 13551] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Lamontagne J}} | 55 months and 23 days | Offender set up a camera to film school yard as well as washroom. Also found to be making videos of him sexually abusing his granddaughter whom he was babysitting. The offender was 72 years old. Also made 161 Order for 20 years.}} | {{SCase1|R c GC,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnt1n 2011 QCCQ 13551] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Lamontagne J}} | 55 months and 23 days | Offender set up a camera to film school yard as well as washroom. Also found to be making videos of him sexually abusing his granddaughter whom he was babysitting. The offender was 72 years old. Also made 161 Order for 20 years.}} | ||
{{SCase1|R c Gagné, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm1jk 2011 QCCQ 6888] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Champoux J}} | 3 | {{SCase1|R c Gagné, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm1jk 2011 QCCQ 6888] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Champoux J}} | {{JailY|3}} (voyeurism)<br> {{JailM|40}} (global) | Offender put a hidden camera in a public washroom. Sold video on the internet of young girl urinating. Was also found in possession of child pornography. }} | ||
{{SCase1| R v Desilva<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fkqdp 2011 ONCJ 133] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Robertson J}} | 7 months + P |offender made videos of sexual activity between him and partner without consent. Offender posted videos on facebook, and sent links of video to friends. convicted at trial of voyeurism and criminal harassment. Prior record with violence.}} | {{SCase1| R v Desilva<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fkqdp 2011 ONCJ 133] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Robertson J}} | 7 months + P |offender made videos of sexual activity between him and partner without consent. Offender posted videos on facebook, and sent links of video to friends. convicted at trial of voyeurism and criminal harassment. Prior record with violence.}} | ||
{{SCase1| R v FG<br> 2011 308 Nfld & P.E.I.R. 59, [http://canlii.ca/t/fkl2n 2011 CanLII 13633] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Hyslop ACJ}} | 3 | {{SCase1| R v FG<br> 2011 308 Nfld & P.E.I.R. 59, [http://canlii.ca/t/fkl2n 2011 CanLII 13633] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Hyslop ACJ}} | {{CSOM|3}} +<br> {{ProbationY|3}} | secretly installed a video camera in 17 year old daughter’s bedroom, huge violation of privacy, recorded full frontal nudity, breach of trust, no record}} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Mahabir,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c4p7 2010 ONCJ 347] (CanLII) | suspended|}} | {{SCase1|R v Mahabir,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c4p7 2010 ONCJ 347] (CanLII){{perONCJ|De Filippis J}} | suspended|}} | ||
{{SCase1| R v JHN<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c71l 2010 BCPC 155] (CanLII) | S/S | attended residence of two teenage girls repeatedly and watched them undress multiple times. No record, positive psych report}} | {{SCase1| R v JHN<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c71l 2010 BCPC 155] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Rodgers J}} | S/S | attended residence of two teenage girls repeatedly and watched them undress multiple times. No record, positive psych report}} | ||
{{SCase1| R v SM<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c4p7 2010 ONCJ 347] (CanLII) | S/S + 18 mo | The offender secretly videotaped consensual explicit sexual activity at a hotel room of ex-girlfriend. Hewas mature, well‑educated and successful. He had no prior criminal record. Offence required planning.}} | {{SCase1| R v SM<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c4p7 2010 ONCJ 347] (CanLII){{perONCJ|De Filippis J}} | S/S + 18 mo | The offender secretly videotaped consensual explicit sexual activity at a hotel room of ex-girlfriend. Hewas mature, well‑educated and successful. He had no prior criminal record. Offence required planning.}} | ||
{{SCase1| R v Laskaris <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1x1hl 2008 BCPC 130] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Gill J}} | discharge | invasion of privacy, offender was dentist who | {{SCase1| R v Laskaris <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1x1hl 2008 BCPC 130] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Gill J}} | discharge | invasion of privacy, the offender was a dentist who placed cameras in women’s washroom to monitor for theft from office, was in a position of trust, no record.}} | ||
{{SCase1| R v Grice<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/212rg 2008 ONCJ 476] (CanLII) | S/S | offender | {{SCase1| R v Grice<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/212rg 2008 ONCJ 476] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Pugsley J}} | S/S | offender videotaped estranged wife showering through the bathroom window. guilty plea, no prior record.}} | ||
{{SCase1| R v Weinheimer <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1v95b 2007 ABPC 349] (CanLII) | S/S | offender secretly photographed 15 men in washroom at his work. Images were stored on computer with details on personal information. No evidence of distribution, positive psych report.}} | {{SCase1| R v Weinheimer <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1v95b 2007 ABPC 349] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fradsham J}} | S/S | offender secretly photographed 15 men in washroom at his work. Images were stored on a computer with details on personal information. No evidence of distribution, positive psych report.}} | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} |