Voyeurism (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
Line 8: Line 8:
{{SCase1|R v D.W.1,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gx7cl 2016 ONCJ 772] (CanLII){{perONCJ|West J}} | | }}
{{SCase1|R v D.W.1,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gx7cl 2016 ONCJ 772] (CanLII){{perONCJ|West J}} | | }}


{{SCase1|R v McDonald, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gs4k0 2016 QCCQ 5288] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|bBaulieu J}} | {{DischargeC}} | }}
{{SCase1|R v McDonald, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/gs4k0 2016 QCCQ 5288] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Beaulieu J}} | {{DischargeC}} | }}


{{SCase1|R v Cyr, [http://canlii.ca/t/gg0zr 2015 QCCQ 196] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Daoust J}} |{{jailM|12}} +<Br> {{probationM|12}} | }}
{{SCase1|R v Cyr, [http://canlii.ca/t/gg0zr 2015 QCCQ 196] (CanLII){{perQCCQ|Daoust J}} |{{jailM|12}} +<Br> {{probationM|12}} | }}


{{SCase1|R v Concepcion, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/h41b6 2017 BCPC 153] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Challenger J}} | Suspended Sentence | }}
{{SCase1|R v Concepcion, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/h41b6 2017 BCPC 153] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Challenger J}} | {{suspended}} | }}
 
{{SCase1|R v Muggridge, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ggmg6 2015 CanLII 10931] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Gorman J}} |  {{Suspended}} +<Br>{{ProbationM|12}}


{{SCase1|R v Truong, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g1t5c 2013 ABCA 373] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} (2:1)|4 months (voyeurism)<br> 12 months (global) | The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism in addition to other offences. The recording captured a sexual assault. The sex assault was not considered an aggravating factor.}}
{{SCase1|R v Truong, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g1t5c 2013 ABCA 373] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} (2:1)|4 months (voyeurism)<br> 12 months (global) | The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism in addition to other offences. The recording captured a sexual assault. The sex assault was not considered an aggravating factor.}}
Line 42: Line 44:
{{SCase1| R v Desilva<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fkqdp 2011 ONCJ 133] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Robertson J}} | 7 months + P |offender made videos of sexual activity between him and partner without consent. Offender posted videos on facebook, and sent links of video to friends. convicted at trial of voyeurism and criminal harassment. Prior record with violence.}}
{{SCase1| R v Desilva<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fkqdp 2011 ONCJ 133] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Robertson J}} | 7 months + P |offender made videos of sexual activity between him and partner without consent. Offender posted videos on facebook, and sent links of video to friends. convicted at trial of voyeurism and criminal harassment. Prior record with violence.}}


{{SCase1| R v FG<br> 2011 308 Nfld & P.E.I.R. 59, [http://canlii.ca/t/fkl2n 2011 CanLII 13633] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Hyslop ACJ}} | {{CSOM|3}} +<br> {{ProbationY|3}} | secretly installed a video camera in 17 year old daughter’s bedroom, huge violation of privacy, recorded full frontal nudity, breach of trust, no record}}
{{SCase1| R v FG<br> 2011 308 Nfld & P.E.I.R. 59, [http://canlii.ca/t/fkl2n 2011 CanLII 13633] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Hyslop ACJ}} | {{CSOM|3}} +<br> {{ProbationY|3}} | The offender secretly installed a video camera in 17 year old daughter’s bedroom, huge violation of privacy, recorded full frontal nudity, breach of trust, no record. "At all material times the accused was the stepfather of the complainant who was at the time of the offence a minor and was 17 years old. At the time of the offence, he was home alone with the young person who was in the shower. While the young person was in the shower, he entered her bedroom and installed a video recorder which was aimed toward the bed. The camera was installed in her closet in such a way that it offered a considerable view of the bed and vanity area. According to the account given by counsel for the accused, there had been some discipline problems in the house where the complainant had been alone in the bedroom with a boyfriend and the accused wanted to spy on her to see the extent of what was going on in the home when he was absent. In this case, the camera was set up for a long term recording."}}


{{SCase1|R v Mahabir,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c4p7 2010 ONCJ 347] (CanLII){{perONCJ|De Filippis J}} | suspended|}}
{{SCase1|R v Mahabir,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c4p7 2010 ONCJ 347] (CanLII){{perONCJ|De Filippis J}} | suspended|}}

Revision as of 17:55, 5 November 2018