Voyeurism (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
Line 14: Line 14:
{{SCase1|R v Concepcion, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/h41b6 2017 BCPC 153] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Challenger J}} | {{suspended}} | }}
{{SCase1|R v Concepcion, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/h41b6 2017 BCPC 153] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Challenger J}} | {{suspended}} | }}


{{SCase1|R v Muggridge, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ggmg6 2015 CanLII 10931] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Gorman J}} |  {{Suspended}} +<Br>{{ProbationM|12}}
{{SCase1|R v Muggridge, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ggmg6 2015 CanLII 10931] (NL PC){{perNLPC|Gorman J}} |  {{Suspended}} +<Br>{{ProbationM|12}}| }}


{{SCase1|R v Truong, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g1t5c 2013 ABCA 373] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} (2:1)|4 months (voyeurism)<br> 12 months (global) | The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism in addition to other offences. The recording captured a sexual assault. The sex assault was not considered an aggravating factor.}}
{{SCase1|R v Truong, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g1t5c 2013 ABCA 373] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} (2:1)|4 months (voyeurism)<br> 12 months (global) | The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism in addition to other offences. The recording captured a sexual assault. The sex assault was not considered an aggravating factor.}}

Revision as of 19:00, 5 November 2018