Distribution of Intimate Images (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z]+)," to "''$1''," |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{SCase1|R v Haines-Matthews, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/hw4tj 2018 ABPC 264] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fradsham J}} | {{JailM|5}} + {{ProbationM|12}} | }} | {{SCase1|R v Haines-Matthews, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/hw4tj 2018 ABPC 264] (CanLII){{perABPC|Fradsham J}} | {{JailM|5}} + {{ProbationM|12}} | }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v JB, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/htc44 2018 ONSC 4726] (CanLII){{perONSC|Leach J}} | {{CSOM|16}} <Br> {{ProbationY|3}} | }} | {{SCase1|''R v JB'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/htc44 2018 ONSC 4726] (CanLII){{perONSC|Leach J}} | {{CSOM|16}} <Br> {{ProbationY|3}} | }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v AC, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/htc44 2017 ONCJ 317] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Leach J}} | {{jailM|5}} | "The male offender, a 32 year old with no criminal record, was in a relationship with the female victim during the course of which, and with her consent, he took intimate videos and nude photographs of her. After the relationship ended, the offender, without consent, posted on three websites those videos and photographs together with derogatory comments. The victim’s name was posted with the images and her face was visible on some of the images."[http://canlii.ca/t/hw4tj] }} | {{SCase1|''R v AC'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/htc44 2017 ONCJ 317] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Leach J}} | {{jailM|5}} | "The male offender, a 32 year old with no criminal record, was in a relationship with the female victim during the course of which, and with her consent, he took intimate videos and nude photographs of her. After the relationship ended, the offender, without consent, posted on three websites those videos and photographs together with derogatory comments. The victim’s name was posted with the images and her face was visible on some of the images."[http://canlii.ca/t/hw4tj] }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v JS, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/hq7nk 2018 ONCJ 82] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Ghosh J}} | {{JailM|18}} | "They were dating and agreed to occasionally video record their sexual activity. None of the videos were intended for public view. After a time she found the cameras unsettling and declined to participate in further recordings. Then she began finding hidden cameras. At one point she located on his laptop publicly posted videos of their sexual activity. Her name was tagged. She demanded that he fix it. He said that he would and, instead, continued to post videos of their sexual activity on a variety of online platforms. Then strangers began contacting her." Joint Submission.}} | {{SCase1|''R v JS'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/hq7nk 2018 ONCJ 82] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Ghosh J}} | {{JailM|18}} | "They were dating and agreed to occasionally video record their sexual activity. None of the videos were intended for public view. After a time she found the cameras unsettling and declined to participate in further recordings. Then she began finding hidden cameras. At one point she located on his laptop publicly posted videos of their sexual activity. Her name was tagged. She demanded that he fix it. He said that he would and, instead, continued to post videos of their sexual activity on a variety of online platforms. Then strangers began contacting her." Joint Submission.}} | ||
{{SCase1|R v PSD, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gw378 2016 BCPC 400] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Sudeyko J}} | Suspended, 2 years probation | The offender took pictures of a female that he had been in a relationship with and sent it to two friends. The photos were of the victim partially clothed and her bare breasts were visible. The photos were blurry and hard to make out the subject. The Crown asked for 90 days jail. }} | {{SCase1|''R v PSD'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gw378 2016 BCPC 400] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Sudeyko J}} | Suspended, 2 years probation | The offender took pictures of a female that he had been in a relationship with and sent it to two friends. The photos were of the victim partially clothed and her bare breasts were visible. The photos were blurry and hard to make out the subject. The Crown asked for 90 days jail. }} | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
{{SCase1|R v BH,<br>[2016] O.J. No. 7080 (ONCJ){{NOCANLII}}{{perONCJ|Dorval J}} | | "During a relationship between the female victim and the male offender, without the victim’s consent, the offender made videos and intimate photographs of the victim which he posted on amateur pornography sites. Access to the images and videos he posted on the sites required one to obtain a password from the offender." [http://canlii.ca/t/hw4tj] }} | {{SCase1|''R v BH'',<br>[2016] O.J. No. 7080 (ONCJ){{NOCANLII}}{{perONCJ|Dorval J}} | | "During a relationship between the female victim and the male offender, without the victim’s consent, the offender made videos and intimate photographs of the victim which he posted on amateur pornography sites. Access to the images and videos he posted on the sites required one to obtain a password from the offender." [http://canlii.ca/t/hw4tj] }} | ||
--> | --> | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} | ||