Operation While Prohibited (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{SCaseHeaderLong}} | {{SCaseHeaderLong}} | ||
{{SCaseLong| | {{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIRS|Monykal|2503d|2009 ABPC 220 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC| Sully J}} |AB|PC | |Office did not have sufficient grounds to make the demand. Driver was driving slowly at 2am. Claimed to be lost. Admitted to drinking two glasses of wine sometime in the evening. Officer should have narrowed the time period.}} | ||
{{SCaseLong| | {{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIRS|Virani|frdwp|2012 ABCA 155 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourtABCA}} |AB|CA| {{JailM|12}} |}} | ||
{{SCaseLong| | {{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIRS|Quewezance|fnn9v|2011 SKCA 123 (CanLII)}}{{perSKCA| Ottenbreit JA}}|SK|CA| {{JailM|9}} | very long record, 5 prior offences}} | ||
{{SCaseLong| | {{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIRS|Marroquin|fpsxv|2012 ABCA 28 (CanLII)}}{{perABCA| Berger JA}}| AB|CA | {{JailM|12}} | long record with 7 MV related convictions}} | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 24 November 2020
- < Sentencing
- < Cases
Driving While Prohibited
| ||||||||
| Case Name | Prv. | Crt. | Sentence | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R v Monykal, 2009 ABPC 220 (CanLII), per Sully J | AB | PC | Office did not have sufficient grounds to make the demand. Driver was driving slowly at 2am. Claimed to be lost. Admitted to drinking two glasses of wine sometime in the evening. Officer should have narrowed the time period. | |
| R v Virani, 2012 ABCA 155 (CanLII), per curiam | AB | CA | 12 months imprisonment | |
| R v Quewezance, 2011 SKCA 123 (CanLII), per Ottenbreit JA | SK | CA | 9 months imprisonment | very long record, 5 prior offences |
| R v Marroquin, 2012 ABCA 28 (CanLII), per Berger JA | AB | CA | 12 months imprisonment | long record with 7 MV related convictions |
See Also
| |||||