Criminal Harassment (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{SCase1|R v Wall, <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fzk0g 2013 SKQB 239] (CanLII) | 4 months CSO + 1 yr prob. | The offender was convicted of harassment for making several hundred phone calls to the victim. He banged on the complainant's door for 2 hours. He had an unrelated record for assault causing bodily harm. Judge also imposed 10 year firearm prohibition. }} | {{SCase1|R v Wall, <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fzk0g 2013 SKQB 239] (CanLII) | 4 months CSO + 1 yr prob. | The offender was convicted of harassment for making several hundred phone calls to the victim. He banged on the complainant's door for 2 hours. He had an unrelated record for assault causing bodily harm. Judge also imposed 10 year firearm prohibition. }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Hildebrandt,<br> [2012] O.J. No. 1157 | Suspended |}} | {{SCase1|R v Hildebrandt,<br> [2012] O.J. No. 1157, [http://canlii.ca/t/fqkmg 2012 ONSC 1685] (CanLII) | Suspended |}} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Frank<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpsxw 2012 NSPC 5] (CanLII)| | offender called victim dozens of times--related record for harassment of daughter--also convicted for contact breaches}} | {{SCase1|R v Frank<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpsxw 2012 NSPC 5] (CanLII)| | offender called victim dozens of times--related record for harassment of daughter--also convicted for contact breaches}} | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
{{SCase1|R v Brake,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1t8p2 2007 CanLII 43483] (NL PC)| 12 months + Pr|The offender was convicted of harassment in relation to his ex-wife. He had repeatedly called her. He had a significant criminal record. [per Porter PCJ]}} | {{SCase1|R v Brake,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1t8p2 2007 CanLII 43483] (NL PC)| 12 months + Pr|The offender was convicted of harassment in relation to his ex-wife. He had repeatedly called her. He had a significant criminal record. [per Porter PCJ]}} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Marsden,<br> [2004] BCJ No. 2112 |discharge|}} | {{SCase1|R v Marsden,<br> [2004] BCJ No. 2112, [http://canlii.ca/t/1jprt 2004 BCPC 369] (CanLII) |discharge|}} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Kelly, [2004] N.J. No. 18 (P.C.)| 30 days | "The accused had parked outside the victims’ house and contacted her by telephone." }} | {{SCase1|R v Kelly, [2004] N.J. No. 18 (P.C.), [http://canlii.ca/t/1g79v 2004 CanLII 18861] (NL PC)| 30 days | "The accused had parked outside the victims’ house and contacted her by telephone." }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Strickland, [2004] N.J. No. 368 (P.C.)| 6 months | "The offender had left a message on the victim’s answering machine indicating that: 'if I can't have you, then nobody will.'" }} | {{SCase1|R v Strickland, [2004] N.J. No. 368 (P.C.), [http://canlii.ca/t/1j20q 2004 CanLII 34911] (NL PC)| 6 months | "The offender had left a message on the victim’s answering machine indicating that: 'if I can't have you, then nobody will.'" }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Basha,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ccxc 2002 CanLII 23570] (NL PC) | 5 months + Pr |}} | {{SCase1|R v Basha,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ccxc 2002 CanLII 23570] (NL PC) | 5 months + Pr |}} | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
{{SCase1|R v Bailey,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npmc 1998 CanLII 13318] (NL CA) | 6 months CSO + Pr| }} | {{SCase1|R v Bailey,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npmc 1998 CanLII 13318] (NL CA) | 6 months CSO + Pr| }} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Meehan,<br> [1998] N.J. No. 3 | 9 months CSO + Pr| }} | {{SCase1|R v Meehan,<br> [1998] N.J. No. 3, [http://canlii.ca/t/1nndx 1998 CanLII 13314] (NL SC), [http://canlii.ca/t/fwvn4 1998 CanLII 18761] (NL SC)| 9 months CSO + Pr| }} | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} | ||
{{OffencesNavBar/Violence}} | {{OffencesNavBar/Violence}} | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 18 October 2018
- < Sentencing
- < Cases
| ||||||||
Case Digests
| |||||