Joint Recommendations (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'\,<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-z0-9]+) ([0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \([a-zA-Z]+\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\',<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([0-9]{4} [A-Z]{4} [0-9]+)\] \(CanLII\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Wright|2981s|2010 NSCA 30 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Bateman JA}}|| || | | {{CanLIIR-S|Wright|2981s|2010 NSCA 30 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Bateman JA}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Corbett|1vn7p|2008 NSCA 7 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Bateman JA}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Brian|214q8|2008 NSCA 91 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Starratt|1qnzf|2007 NSCA 21 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Cromwell|1m44w|2005 NSCA 137 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|GP|1x6c3|2004 NSCA 154 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|MacIvor|58ph|2003 NSCA 60 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Cromwell JA}} || || | | {{CanLIIR-S|MacIvor|58ph|2003 NSCA 60 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Cromwell JA}} || || | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 15:17, 6 February 2021
- < Sentencing
- < Cases
Case Digests
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Bullock, 2013 ABCA 44 (CanLII), per Berger JA (2:1) | ||
R v Flanagan, 2012 SKCA 45 (CanLII), per Richards JA | joint rec for CSO on trafficking marijuana charge rejected by trial judge and upheld at appeal | |
R v Wickstrom, 2011 BCSC 745 (CanLII), per Bernard J | ||
R v Oxford, 2010 NLCA 45 (CanLII), per curiam | ||
R v Wright, 2010 NSCA 30 (CanLII), per Bateman JA | ||
R v Corbett, 2008 NSCA 7 (CanLII), per Bateman JA | ||
R v Brian, 2008 NSCA 91 (CanLII), per Hamilton JA | ||
R v Starratt, 2007 NSCA 21 (CanLII), per Hamilton JA | ||
R v Cromwell, 2005 NSCA 137 (CanLII), per Bateman JA | ||
R v GP, 2004 NSCA 154 (CanLII), per Bateman JA | ||
R v MacIvor, 2003 NSCA 60 (CanLII), per Cromwell JA |