Voyeurism (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 14:48, 5 November 2018

< Sentencing
< Cases

Ranges

Template:SCaseHeader

Template:SCase1

{{SCase1|R v M.S.A.,
2013 ABPC 66 (CanLII), per Redman J| 5 months imprisonment2 years probation |

Template:SCase1

|}

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 {{SCaseHeader}}
-{{SCase1|R v Truong, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g1t5c 2013 ABCA 373] (CanLII)|4 months (voyeurism)<br> 12 months (global) | Offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism in addition to other offences. The recording captured a sexual assault. The sex assault was not considered an aggravating factor.}}
+{{SCase1|R v Concepcion, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/h41b6 2017 BCPC 153] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Challenger J}} | Suspended Sentence | }}
-{{SCase1|R v Bosomworth, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gfxgb 2014 BCPC 311] (CanLII)|Suspended |The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism. He was found to be surreptitiously recording persons in the restroom of a small restaurant that he owned. The defense sought a discharge.}}
+{{SCase1|R v Truong, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g1t5c 2013 ABCA 373] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} (2:1)|4 months (voyeurism)<br> 12 months (global) | The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism in addition to other offences. The recording captured a sexual assault. The sex assault was not considered an aggravating factor.}}
-{{SCase1|R v Dekker, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g68w2 2014 ABPC 61] (CanLII) | 9 months CSO| The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism. He filmed people in four public washrooms and his home washroom. He captured 80 people, including men, women and children. There were 77 video clips for a total of 251 minutes of footage. He had a positive PSR and was considered "low risk". }}
+{{SCase1|R v Bosomworth, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gfxgb 2014 BCPC 311] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Dhillon J}}|Suspended |The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism. He was found to be surreptitiously recording persons in the restroom of a small restaurant that he owned. The defence sought a discharge.}}
-{{SCase1|R v Schledermann, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g2z4s 2014 ONSC 674] (CanLII)| 4 years (each count) | The offender pleaded guilty to child pornography offences and voyeurism. He had 22,000+ images and 580+ videos of child pornography. Some pictures were of his step-grand daughter. The offender had 2 years, 4 months and 17 days on remand. He was 71 years old. }}
+{{SCase1|R v Dekker, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g68w2 2014 ABPC 61] (CanLII){{perABPC|Redman J}} | 9 months CSO| The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism. He filmed people in four public washrooms and his home washroom. He captured 80 people, including men, women and children. There were 77 video clips for a total of 251 minutes of footage. He had a positive PSR and was considered "low risk". }}
-{{SCase1|R v Berry, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g3rgc 2014 BCSC 284] (CanLII) | 9 months | The offender was convicted of sexual assault and two counts of voyeurism.}}
+{{SCase1|R v Schledermann, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g2z4s 2014 ONSC 674] (CanLII){{perONSC|Kelly J}}| 4 years (each count) | The offender pleaded guilty to child pornography offences and voyeurism. He had 22,000+ images and 580+ videos of child pornography. Some pictures were of his step-grand daughter. The offender had 2 years, 4 months and 17 days on remand. He was 71 years old. }}
-{{SCase1| R v Keough, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/flcbf 2011 ABQB 312] (CanLII) | 9 months (voyeurism)<br>3 months (copying) <br>| Offender recorded sexual activity between 18 year old couple without consent.}}
+{{SCase1|R v Berry, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g3rgc 2014 BCSC 284] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Holmes J}} | 9 months | The offender was convicted of sexual assault and two counts of voyeurism.}}
-{{SCase1|R v Brandt, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fzfwh 2013 MBPC 39] (CanLII) | 18 months CSO | The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism. He was obsessed with victim and spied on her at work including while she was in the shower. He video taped her twice while showering. The videos were discovered by his wife. He was 41 years old and married. He had no criminal record.}}
+{{SCase1| R v Keough, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/flcbf 2011 ABQB 312] (CanLII){{perABQB|Manderscheid J}} | 9 months (voyeurism)<br>3 months (copying) <br>| Offender recorded sexual activity between 18 year old couple without consent.}}
-{{SCase1|R v M.S.A., <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fxj7x 2013 ABPC 66] (CanLII) | | }}
+{{SCase1|R v Brandt, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fzfwh 2013 MBPC 39] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Lee Ann Martin J}} | {{CSOM|18}} | The offender pleaded guilty to voyeurism. He was obsessed with victim and spied on her at work including while she was in the shower. He videotaped her twice while showering. The videos were discovered by his wife. He was 41 years old and married. He had no criminal record.}}
-{{SCase1|R v Rocha,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fq4vd 2012 ABPC 24] (CanLII) | Suspended | Offender was  fueler for airplanes at an airport. He took pictures up the skirt of a female passenger while she was standing at the baggage carousel.}}
+{{SCase1|R v M.S.A., <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fxj7x 2013 ABPC 66] (CanLII){{perABPC|Redman J}}| {{jailM|5}}{{probationY|2}} |
+{{SCase1|R v Rocha,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fq4vd 2012 ABPC 24] (CanLII) | {{suspended}} | Offender was  fueler for airplanes at an airport. He took pictures up the skirt of a female passenger while she was standing at the baggage carousel.}}
 {{SCase1|R v D, MD, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnlk8 2011 NWTTC 20] (CanLII)| 3 years |}}