Telecommunication Offences (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{SCaseHeader}} | {{SCaseHeader}} | ||
{{SCase1|R v Kerton, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/599j 2001 NBQB 106] (CanLII){{perNBQB|Russell J}} | fine and 10 month probation | The offenders were husband and wife and were convicted at trial under s. 372. The victim was having an affair with one of them. The accused told victim that both husband and wife had AIDS. The accused were of otherwise good character. Judge rejected discharge. | {{SCase1|R v Kerton, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/599j 2001 NBQB 106] (CanLII){{perNBQB|Russell J}} | fine and 10 month probation | The offenders were husband and wife and were convicted at trial under s. 372. The victim was having an affair with one of them. The accused told victim that both husband and wife had AIDS. The accused were of otherwise good character. Judge rejected discharge.}} | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} | ||