Jump to content

Drug Production (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\| [0-9] years \|" to "| {{JailY|$1}} |"
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
{{SCaseHeaderDrugs}}
{{SCaseHeaderDrugs}}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Nguyen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnl1c 2011 ONSC 6229] (CanLII){{perONSC|McWatt J}} || {{JailY|}} |  | age 23; also charged w arson; lab }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Nguyen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnl1c 2011 ONSC 6229] (CanLII){{perONSC|McWatt J}} || {{JailY|5}} |  | age 23; also charged w arson; lab }}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Durette'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npnk 1992 CanLII 2779] (ON CA), (1992), 9 O.R. (3d) 557{{perONCA|Finlayson JA}}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Durette'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npnk 1992 CanLII 2779] (ON CA), (1992), 9 O.R. (3d) 557{{perONCA|Finlayson JA}}
| 5-9 years | | biker gang-related }}
| 5-9 years | | biker gang-related }}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Lukaniuk'',<br>(1989) 34 O.A.C. 321 (C.A.) {{NOCANLII}} | {{JailY|}} | | lab  }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Lukaniuk'',<br>(1989) 34 O.A.C. 321 (C.A.) {{NOCANLII}} | {{JailY|6}} | | lab  }}




Line 83: Line 83:
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Nannan'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1rg06 2007 SKCA 50] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Lane JA}}| CSO | 237 plants | }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Nannan'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1rg06 2007 SKCA 50] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Lane JA}}| CSO | 237 plants | }}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Nguyen'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1vgvd 2007 NSPC 69] (CanLII){{perNSPC|C Williams J}} | {{JailY|}} |  |Offender also charged with possession marijuana for trafficking, unlawful diversion of electricity. Prior dated record for trafficking x 4. Sophisticated operation. }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Nguyen'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1vgvd 2007 NSPC 69] (CanLII){{perNSPC|C Williams J}} | {{JailY|4}} |  |Offender also charged with possession marijuana for trafficking, unlawful diversion of electricity. Prior dated record for trafficking x 4. Sophisticated operation. }}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v MacDonald'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1vgww 2007 NSSC 308] (CanLII){{perNSSC|Cacchione J}} | | | }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v MacDonald'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1vgww 2007 NSSC 308] (CanLII){{perNSSC|Cacchione J}} | | | }}
Line 91: Line 91:
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Hoang'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1r06h 2007 SKPC 19] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Snell J}}|2 years less CSO | 348 plants |}}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Hoang'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1r06h 2007 SKPC 19] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Snell J}}|2 years less CSO | 348 plants |}}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Tanasichuk'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1s2cf 2007 BCSC 1028] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Brooke J}}| 18 mo CSO | | }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Tanasichuk'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1s2cf 2007 BCSC 1028] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Brooke J}}| 18 months CSO | | }}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Siek'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/1qnzh 2007 NSCA 23] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Oland JA}}| {{JailY|}} | |}}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Siek'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/1qnzh 2007 NSCA 23] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Oland JA}}| {{JailY|2}} | |}}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Koenders'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/24z78 2006 BCSC 1045] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Holmes J}}|  2 years less | | }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Koenders'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/24z78 2006 BCSC 1045] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Holmes J}}|  2 years less | | }}
Line 101: Line 101:
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v MacIvor'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/58ph 2003 NSCA 60] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Cromwell JA}}|4 months | | A joint recommendation. He had lukemia and no criminal record.}}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v MacIvor'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/58ph 2003 NSCA 60] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Cromwell JA}}|4 months | | A joint recommendation. He had lukemia and no criminal record.}}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v McCurdy'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5g35 2002 NSCA 132] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Roscoe JA}}| {{JailY|}} | 500 plants | sophisticated operation }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v McCurdy'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5g35 2002 NSCA 132] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Roscoe JA}}| {{JailY|3}} | 500 plants | sophisticated operation }}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Shacklock'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/4v7j 2000 NSCA 120] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Roscoe JA}}| 18 months | 214 marijuana plants|  }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Shacklock'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/4v7j 2000 NSCA 120] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Roscoe JA}}| 18 months | 214 marijuana plants|  }}
Line 121: Line 121:
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Reid''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1z902 2008 NSPC 41] (CanLII){{perNSPC|C Williams J}} | 48 months |30,000 ecstasy pills | before remand credit }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Reid''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1z902 2008 NSPC 41] (CanLII){{perNSPC|C Williams J}} | 48 months |30,000 ecstasy pills | before remand credit }}


{{SCaseDrugs| ''R v Iverson''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q6dn 2007 BCCA 3] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Mackenzie JA}}| {{JailY|}} | | ecstasy lab}}
{{SCaseDrugs| ''R v Iverson''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q6dn 2007 BCCA 3] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Mackenzie JA}}| {{JailY|5}} | | ecstasy lab}}


{{SCaseDrugs| ''R v Scott'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n51b 2006 BCSC 678] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Gerow J}}| 4 years  | | ecstasy lab}}
{{SCaseDrugs| ''R v Scott'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n51b 2006 BCSC 678] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Gerow J}}| 4 years  | | ecstasy lab}}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Ma'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1k2jk 2005 BCSC 493] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Holmes J}} | {{JailY|}} | 76 kg of ecstasy  | meth lab }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Ma'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1k2jk 2005 BCSC 493] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Holmes J}} | {{JailY|6}} | 76 kg of ecstasy  | meth lab }}


{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Lau'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/58z3 2003 SKPC 92] (CanLII){{perSKPC|McMurtry J}}| 3 and 4 years  | 100,000 pills of ecstasy | }}
{{SCaseDrugs|''R v Lau'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/58z3 2003 SKPC 92] (CanLII){{perSKPC|McMurtry J}}| 3 and 4 years  | 100,000 pills of ecstasy | }}

Revision as of 12:55, 13 April 2020

Schedule I

Meth production

Case Name Prov. Crt. Sentence Drug / Quant. Summary
R v Nguyen,
2011 ONSC 6229 (CanLII), per McWatt J
5 years imprisonment age 23; also charged w arson; lab {{{6}}}
R v Durette,
1992 CanLII 2779 (ON CA), (1992), 9 O.R. (3d) 557, per Finlayson JA
5-9 years biker gang-related {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Lukaniuk,
(1989) 34 O.A.C. 321 (C.A.) (*no CanLII links)
6 years imprisonment lab {{{5}}} {{{6}}}

Schedule II

Grow ops / Cultivation

Case Name Prov. Crt. Sentence Drug / Quant. Summary
R v Habib,
2018 NSSC 170 (CanLII), per Chipman J
12 months (production, #1)
4 months (trafficking #1)
8 months (production #2)
2.5 months (trafficking #2)
{{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Hatt,
2018 NSCA 51 (CanLII), per Derrick JA
3 months The offender was convicted of possessions and cultivation of marijuana, firearms offences, and possession of illegal tobacco. The Court of Appeal overturned a sentence of 12 months {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Serov,
2017 BCCA 456 (CanLII), per Stromberg-Stein JA
12 months Court finds mandatory minimum unconstitutional. {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v McGee,
2017 BCCA 457 (CanLII), per Stromberg-Stein JA
10 months Court finds mandatory minimum unconstitutional. {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Chen,
2017 ONCA 946 (CanLII), per curiam
6 months CSO and 12 months probation {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Munn,
2016 CanLII 90178 (NB CA), per Baird JA
12 months unknown The offender's grow operation was discovered when he accidentally started a fire while trying to extract oil from marijuana in his washroom. He caused extensive damage to his apartment where he lived with his wife and children. He was 35 years old with an aboriginal background. He also has an extensive criminal record. {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Parr,
2016 BCCA 463 (CanLII), per Goepel JA
8 months imprisonment The offender was convicted of production and trafficking in marijuana. {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Patton,
2016 NSSC 222 (CanLII), per Scaravelli J
18 months (production)
12 months (trafficking)
[per Scaravelli SCJ] {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Malenfant,
2016 BCSC 995 (CanLII), per Humphries J
18 months CSO {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Lau,
2014 BCCA 176 (CanLII), per MacKenzie JA
9 months imprisonment 629 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Nguyen,
2012 MBCA 72 (CanLII), per Monnin JA
2 years less a day 690 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Lo,
2012 SKQB 239 (CanLII), per Schwann J
2 years less a day CSO 572 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v St. Germain,
2012 ABCA 198 (CanLII), per curiam
12 months 2.2 pounds of plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Bick,
2012 ONCJ 233 (CanLII), per Harris J
1 year 2,074 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Konstantakis,
2011 BCPC 319 (CanLII), per Bennett J
12 months 1,216 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Lam and Vo,
2011 BCPC 321 (CanLII), per O'Byrne J
18 months 1,264 marihuana plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Emonts,
2011 ONCJ 544 (CanLII), per Hearn J
18 months CSO 532 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Chen,
2011 BCPC 297 (CanLII), per Bayliff J
12 mo CSO 1,139 plants gardener for a grow-op {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Vu,
2011 BCPC 269 (CanLII), per Giardini J
9 months imprisonment 786 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Bi,
2011 BCCA 204 (CanLII), per Saunders JA
9 mo {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Evers,
2011 BCCA 330 (CanLII), per Hall JA
12 mo probation {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Day,
2011 ONSC 1148 (CanLII), per Thorburn J
2 years less a day CSO 3.9kg 385g mushrooms and 27 g cocaine as well {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Hann,
2011 NLTD 66 (CanLII), per Seaborn J
15 mo CSO 4813.7 grams limited record; joint recommendation {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Horkoff,
2010 SKCA 79 (CanLII), per Richards JA
30 months 323 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Giang,
2010 BCSC 1016 (CanLII), per Pearlman J
15 mo CSO {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Hobbs,
2009 NSSC 258 (CanLII), per Coughlan J
30 mo jail {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Wetherill,
2009 BCPC 356 (CanLII), per Brecknell J
18 mo CSO {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Hobbs,
2009 NSSC 258 (CanLII), per Coughlan J
30 months [per Coughlan SCJ] {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Simpson,
2008 NSSC 57 (CanLII), per Cacchione J
1 day {{{6}}}
R v Nannan,
2007 SKCA 50 (CanLII), per Lane JA
CSO 237 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Nguyen,
2007 NSPC 69 (CanLII), per C Williams J
4 years imprisonment Offender also charged with possession marijuana for trafficking, unlawful diversion of electricity. Prior dated record for trafficking x 4. Sophisticated operation. {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v MacDonald,
2007 NSSC 308 (CanLII), per Cacchione J
{{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Nguyen,
2007 NSSC 134 (CanLII), per Kennedy CJ
{{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Hoang,
2007 SKPC 19 (CanLII), per Snell J
2 years less CSO 348 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Tanasichuk,
2007 BCSC 1028 (CanLII), per Brooke J
18 months CSO {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Siek,
2007 NSCA 23 (CanLII), per Oland JA
2 years imprisonment {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Koenders,
2006 BCSC 1045 (CanLII), per Holmes J
2 years less {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Wong,
2005 NBQB 150 (CanLII), per Glennie J
2 years {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v MacIvor,
2003 NSCA 60 (CanLII), per Cromwell JA
4 months A joint recommendation. He had lukemia and no criminal record. {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v McCurdy,
2002 NSCA 132 (CanLII), per Roscoe JA
3 years imprisonment 500 plants sophisticated operation {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Shacklock,
2000 NSCA 120 (CanLII), per Roscoe JA
18 months 214 marijuana plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Brass,
2000 BCSC 988 (CanLII), per Brass J
12 mo CSO {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Connolly,
1998 CanLII 3631 (NS CA), [1998] NSJ No. 375, per Chipman JA
14 months million dollar grow-op related record; on probation at time {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Frenette,
1997 CanLII 3512 (NS CA), per Jones JA
14 months The Court rejected a CSO as a sentence. [per Jones JA] {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Booth,
1996 CanLII 5020 (SK CA), per Vancise JA
3 years 400 plants {{{5}}} {{{6}}}

Schedule III - Meth

Case Name Prov. Crt. Sentence Drug / Quant. Summary
R v Reid
2008 NSPC 41 (CanLII), per C Williams J
48 months 30,000 ecstasy pills before remand credit {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Iverson
2007 BCCA 3 (CanLII), per Mackenzie JA
5 years imprisonment ecstasy lab {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Scott,
2006 BCSC 678 (CanLII), per Gerow J
4 years ecstasy lab {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Ma,
2005 BCSC 493 (CanLII), per Holmes J
6 years imprisonment 76 kg of ecstasy meth lab {{{5}}} {{{6}}}
R v Lau,
2003 SKPC 92 (CanLII), per McMurtry J
3 and 4 years 100,000 pills of ecstasy {{{5}}} {{{6}}}