Unauthorized Use of Computer (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\| ([0-9]*) months \|" to "| {{JailM|$1}} |" |
m Text replacement - "([0-9]*) months CSO" to "{{CSOM|$1}}" |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{SCase1|''R v Mackie'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fxbqd 2013 ABPC 116] (CanLII){{perABPC| Skene J}} |1 year (unauthorized use x 5)<br> 11 years (global) |The offender was convicted of luring, extortion, child pornography, identity fraud, invitation to sexual touching. See [[Child Luring (Sentencing Cases)]] }} | {{SCase1|''R v Mackie'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fxbqd 2013 ABPC 116] (CanLII){{perABPC| Skene J}} |1 year (unauthorized use x 5)<br> 11 years (global) |The offender was convicted of luring, extortion, child pornography, identity fraud, invitation to sexual touching. See [[Child Luring (Sentencing Cases)]] }} | ||
{{SCase1|''R v Grecu'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hm4r 2004 ABPC 61] (CanLII){{perABPC| Semenuk J}} | 12 | {{SCase1|''R v Grecu'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hm4r 2004 ABPC 61] (CanLII){{perABPC| Semenuk J}} | {{CSOM|12}} | The offender pleaded guilty to 5 offences involving the unauthorized computer equipment, cameras and other devices. He and an accomplice used the devices to forge credit cards which were in turn used to withdraw money. The offence was "sophisticated and involved a number of co-accused in what can only be described as organized criminal activity at the highest level". The total loss was $38,147.99, while the risk of loss was $648,820.00.}} | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} | ||