Drug Production (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{SCaseHeaderDrugs}} | {{SCaseHeaderDrugs}} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R. v. Hatt,<br> 2018 NSCA 51 (CanLII) | 3 months | | The offender was convicted of possessions and cultivation of marijuana, firearms offences, and possession of illegal tobacco. The Court of Appeal overturned a sentence of 12 months }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Habib, <br> 2018 NSSC 170 (CanLII) | 12 months (production, #1)<br> 4 months (trafficking #1)<Br> 8 months (production #2)<Br> 2.5 months (trafficking #2)| | [per Chipman SCJ] }} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R. v. Hatt,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/hshwb 2018 NSCA 51] (CanLII) | 3 months | | The offender was convicted of possessions and cultivation of marijuana, firearms offences, and possession of illegal tobacco. The Court of Appeal overturned a sentence of 12 months }} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Serov, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/hphc8 2017 BCCA 456] (CanLII) | 12 months | | Court finds mandatory minimum unconstitutional. }} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v McGee, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/hphc9 2017 BCCA 457] (CanLII) | 10 months | | Court finds mandatory minimum unconstitutional.}} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Chen, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/hp3vj 2017 ONCA 946] (CanLII) | 6 months CSO and 12 months probation| | }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Chen, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/hp3vj 2017 ONCA 946] (CanLII) | 6 months CSO and 12 months probation| | }} | ||
Line 30: | Line 36: | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Parr, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gvvn9 2016 BCCA 463] (CanLII) | 8 months | |The offender was convicted of production and trafficking in marijuana. }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Parr, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/gvvn9 2016 BCCA 463] (CanLII) | 8 months | |The offender was convicted of production and trafficking in marijuana. }} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Patton, [http://canlii.ca/t/gt7w9 2016 NSSC 222] (CanLII) | 18 months (production)<Br> 12 months (trafficking) | | [per Scaravelli SCJ]}} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Malenfant, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/grzc0 2016 BCSC 995] (CanLII) | 18 months CSO| | }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Malenfant, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/grzc0 2016 BCSC 995] (CanLII) | 18 months CSO| | }} | ||
Line 65: | Line 73: | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Giang,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bpmw 2010 BCSC 1016] (CanLII)| 15 mo CSO | | }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Giang,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bpmw 2010 BCSC 1016] (CanLII)| 15 mo CSO | | }} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Hobbs,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25bsf 2009 NSSC 258] (CanLII) | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Hobbs,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25bsf 2009 NSSC 258] (CanLII)| 30 mo jail | | }} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Wetherill,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/27thm 2009 BCPC 356] (CanLII)| 18 mo CSO | | }} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Hobbs, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25bsf 2009 NSSC 258] (CanLII) | 30 months | | [per Coughlan SCJ]}} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Simpson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25bsf 2008 NSSC 57] (CanLII)|| 1 day | |}} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Simpson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25bsf 2008 NSSC 57] (CanLII)|| 1 day | |}} | ||
Line 74: | Line 84: | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Nguyen, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1vgvd 2007 NSPC 69] (CanLII) | 4 years | |Offender also charged with possession marijuana for trafficking, unlawful diversion of electricity. Prior dated record for trafficking x 4. Sophisticated operation. }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Nguyen, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1vgvd 2007 NSPC 69] (CanLII) | 4 years | |Offender also charged with possession marijuana for trafficking, unlawful diversion of electricity. Prior dated record for trafficking x 4. Sophisticated operation. }} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v MacDonald,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1vgww 2007 NSSC 308] (CanLII) | | | }} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Nguyen, <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1rkpc 2007 NSSC 134] (CanLII) | | | }} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Hoang,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1r06h 2007 SKPC 19] (CanLII)|2 years less CSO | 348 plants |}} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Hoang,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1r06h 2007 SKPC 19] (CanLII)|2 years less CSO | 348 plants |}} | ||
Line 94: | Line 108: | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Connolly,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6g79 1998 CanLII 3631] (NS CA), [1998] NSJ No. 375 | 14 months | million dollar grow-op | related record; on probation at time }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Connolly,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6g79 1998 CanLII 3631] (NS CA), [1998] NSJ No. 375 | 14 months | million dollar grow-op | related record; on probation at time }} | ||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Frenette, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1h36l 1997 CanLII 3512] (NS CA) | 14 months | | The Court rejected a CSO as a sentence. [per Jones JA]}} | |||
{{SCaseDrugs|R v Booth,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1mb6g 1996 CanLII 5020] (SK CA)|3 years | 400 plants | }} | {{SCaseDrugs|R v Booth,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1mb6g 1996 CanLII 5020] (SK CA)|3 years | 400 plants | }} |
Revision as of 12:39, 19 July 2018
- < Sentencing
- < Cases
|
Schedule I
Meth production
Case Name | Prov. | Crt. | Sentence | Drug / Quant. | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R v Nguyen, 2011 ONSC 6229 (CanLII) |
5 years | age 23; also charged w arson; lab | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Durette, 1992 CanLII 2779 (ON CA), (1992), 9 O.R. (3d) 557 |
5-9 years | biker gang-related | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Lukaniuk, (1989) 34 O.A.C. 321 (C.A.) (*no CanLII links) |
6 years | lab | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
Schedule II
Grow ops / Cultivation
Case Name | Prov. | Crt. | Sentence | Drug / Quant. | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R v Habib, 2018 NSSC 170 (CanLII) |
12 months (production, #1) 4 months (trafficking #1) 8 months (production #2) 2.5 months (trafficking #2) |
[per Chipman SCJ] | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R. v. Hatt, 2018 NSCA 51 (CanLII) |
3 months | The offender was convicted of possessions and cultivation of marijuana, firearms offences, and possession of illegal tobacco. The Court of Appeal overturned a sentence of 12 months | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Serov, 2017 BCCA 456 (CanLII) |
12 months | Court finds mandatory minimum unconstitutional. | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v McGee, 2017 BCCA 457 (CanLII) |
10 months | Court finds mandatory minimum unconstitutional. | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Chen, 2017 ONCA 946 (CanLII) |
6 months CSO and 12 months probation | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Munn, 2016 CanLII 90178 (NB CA) |
12 months | unknown | The offender's grow operation was discovered when he accidentally started a fire while trying to extract oil from marijuana in his washroom. He caused extensive damage to his apartment where he lived with his wife and children. He was 35 years old with an aboriginal background. He also has an extensive criminal record. | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Parr, 2016 BCCA 463 (CanLII) |
8 months | The offender was convicted of production and trafficking in marijuana. | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Patton, 2016 NSSC 222 (CanLII) | 18 months (production) 12 months (trafficking) |
[per Scaravelli SCJ] | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Malenfant, 2016 BCSC 995 (CanLII) |
18 months CSO | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Lau, 2014 BCCA 176 (CanLII), |
9 months | 629 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Nguyen, 2012 MBCA 72 (CanLII) |
2 years less a day | 690 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Lo, 2012 SKQB 239 (CanLII) |
2 years less a day CSO | 572 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v St. Germain, 2012 ABCA 198 (CanLII) |
12 months | 2.2 pounds of plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Bick, 2012 ONCJ 233 (CanLII) |
1 year | 2,074 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Konstantakis, 2011 BCPC 319 (CanLII) |
12 months | 1,216 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Lam and Vo, 2011 BCPC 321 (CanLII) |
18 months | 1,264 marihuana plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Emonts, 2011 ONCJ 544 (CanLII) |
18 months CSO | 532 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Chen, 2011 BCPC 297 (CanLII) |
12 mo CSO | 1,139 plants | gardener for a grow-op | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Vu, 2011 BCPC 269 (CanLII) |
9 months | 786 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Bi, 2011 BCCA 204 (CanLII) |
9 mo | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Evers, 2011 BCCA 330 (CanLII) |
12 mo probation | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Day, 2011 ONSC 1148 |
2 years less a day CSO | 3.9kg | 385g mushrooms and 27 g cocaine as well | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Hann, 2011 NLTD 66 (CanLII) |
15 mo CSO | 4813.7 grams | limited record; joint recommendation | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Horkoff, 2010 SKCA 79 (CanLII) |
30 months | 323 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Giang, 2010 BCSC 1016 (CanLII) |
15 mo CSO | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Hobbs, 2009 NSSC 258 (CanLII) |
30 mo jail | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Wetherill, 2009 BCPC 356 (CanLII) |
18 mo CSO | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Hobbs, 2009 NSSC 258 (CanLII) |
30 months | [per Coughlan SCJ] | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Simpson, 2008 NSSC 57 (CanLII) |
1 day | {{{6}}} | |||
R v Nannan, 2007 SKCA 50 (CanLII) |
CSO | 237 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Nguyen, 2007 NSPC 69 (CanLII) |
4 years | Offender also charged with possession marijuana for trafficking, unlawful diversion of electricity. Prior dated record for trafficking x 4. Sophisticated operation. | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v MacDonald, 2007 NSSC 308 (CanLII) |
{{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |||
R v Nguyen, 2007 NSSC 134 (CanLII) |
{{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |||
R v Hoang, 2007 SKPC 19 (CanLII) |
2 years less CSO | 348 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Tanasichuk, 2007 BCSC 1028 (CanLII) |
18 mo CSO | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Siek, 2007 NSCA 23 (CanLII) |
2 years | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Koenders, 2006 BCSC 1045 (CanLII) |
2 years less | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Wong, 2005 NBQB 150 (CanLII) |
2 years | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v MacIvor, 2003 NSCA 60 (CanLII) |
4 months | A joint recommendation. He had lukemia and no criminal record. | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v McCurdy, 2002 NSCA 132 (CanLII) |
3 years | 500 plants | sophisticated operation | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Shacklock, 2000 NSCA 120 (CanLII) |
18 months | 214 marijuana plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Brass, 2000 BCSC 988 (CanLII) |
12 mo CSO | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | ||
R v Connolly, 1998 CanLII 3631 (NS CA), [1998] NSJ No. 375 |
14 months | million dollar grow-op | related record; on probation at time | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Frenette, 1997 CanLII 3512 (NS CA) |
14 months | The Court rejected a CSO as a sentence. [per Jones JA] | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Booth, 1996 CanLII 5020 (SK CA) |
3 years | 400 plants | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
Schedule III - Meth
Case Name | Prov. | Crt. | Sentence | Drug / Quant. | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R v Reid 2008 NSPC 41 (CanLII) |
48 months | 30,000 ecstasy pills | before remand credit | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Iverson 2007 BCCA 3 (CanLII) |
5 years | ecstasy lab | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Scott, 2006 BCSC 678 (CanLII) |
4 years | ecstasy lab | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} | |
R v Ma, 2005 BCSC 493 (CanLII) |
6 years | 76 kg of ecstasy | meth lab | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
R v Lau, 2003 SKPC 92 (CanLII) |
3 and 4 years | 100,000 pills of ecstasy | {{{5}}} | {{{6}}} |
|