Incest (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "|NS|" to "| {{NS}} |"
m Text replacement - "|QC|" to "|{{QC}}|"
Line 33: Line 33:
{{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIR-SN|Goler|(1985), 67 NSR (2d) 200}} | {{NS}} | |{{JailY|5}} | }}  
{{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIR-SN|Goler|(1985), 67 NSR (2d) 200}} | {{NS}} | |{{JailY|5}} | }}  


{{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIRP-S|Comtois|gd70h|1981 CanLII 3183 (QC CA)|62 CCC (2d) 567}}{{perQCCA|Montomery JA}}|QC|CA| {{Suspended}} | }}
{{SCaseLong|{{CanLIIRP-S|Comtois|gd70h|1981 CanLII 3183 (QC CA)|62 CCC (2d) 567}}{{perQCCA|Montomery JA}}|{{QC}}|CA| {{Suspended}} | }}


{{SCaseEnd}}
{{SCaseEnd}}

Revision as of 15:14, 20 November 2023

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2015. (Rev. # 88088)

Case Digests

Case Name Prv. Crt. Sentence Summary
Prior to April 2020 (R v Friesen)
Case Name Prv. Crt. Sentence Summary
R v KVE, 2013 BCCA 521 (CanLII), per Stromberg-Stein JA BC CA 10 years imprisonment
R v RAJ, 2010 BCCA 304 (CanLII), per Bennett JA BC CA 8 years imprisonment The offender sexually assaulted his daughter over 7 years starting at the age of 7.
R v RJG, 2007 BCCA 631 (CanLII), per Saunders JA BC CA 12 years imprisonment The offender plead guilty to sexually assaulting his three daughters and a babysitter. "The abuse began when the daughters were each around the ages of 10. The abuse included sexual intercourse when they were between the ages of 13 - 15."
R v MH, 2005 BCCA 510 (CanLII), per Levine JA BC CA 6 years imprisonment "the accused sexually offended against his stepdaughter for 10 years, starting in 1958 when she was five years old."
R v PPH, 2003 BCCA 591 (CanLII), per Thackray JA BC CA 14 years imprisonment (global)
7 years imprisonment (sex assault x 2)
"a 38-year-old offender who pleaded guilty to sexually offended against his two stepdaughters, aged 12 and 13."
R v DLM, 2001 BCCA 266 (CanLII), per Saunders JA BC CA 5 years imprisonment "the accused digitally penetrated a three and a half year old girl who was living with him as her “Daddy”. The sexual offence caused bodily harm."
R v GPW, (1998), 106 BCAC 239(*no CanLII links) BC CA 20 years imprisonment
R v RPF, 1996 CanLII 5590 (NSCA), per Roscoe JA NS CA 1 year imprisonment
R v GTM, (1995), 61 BCAC 158(*no CanLII links) BC CA 12 years imprisonment "an accused who pleaded guilty to sexually offending against his two daughters in their mid-teens."
R v Goler, (1985), 67 NSR (2d) 200(*no CanLII links) NS 5 years imprisonment
R v Comtois,
1981 CanLII 3183 (QC CA), 62 CCC (2d) 567, per Montomery JA
QC CA Suspended Sentence