Incest (Sentencing Cases): Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 11:04, 21 October 2018

< Sentencing
< Cases

Case Digests

Template:SCaseHeader

Template:SCase1

|}

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {{SCaseHeader}}
-<!--
+{{SCase1|R v KVE, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g246f 2013 BCCA 521] (CanLII) | 10 years | }}
-R. v R.J.G., [http://canlii.ca/t/1v9zh 2007 BCCA 631] (CanLII), this Court upheld a 12-year sentence where the 71-year-old accused pled guilty to sexually assaulting his three daughters and their babysitter. The abuse began when the daughters were each around the ages of 10. The abuse included sexual intercourse when they were between the ages of 13 - 15.
+{{SCase1|R. v R.A.J., [http://canlii.ca/t/2bdsv 2010 BCCA 304] (CanLII)| 8 years | The offender sexually assaulted his daughter over 7 years starting at the age of 7.}}
-R. v M.H., [http://canlii.ca/t/1lwwh 2005 BCCA 510] (CanLII), this Court upheld a six-year sentence where the accused sexually offended against his stepdaughter for 10 years, starting in 1958 when she was five years old.
+{{SCase1|R. v R.J.G., [http://canlii.ca/t/1v9zh 2007 BCCA 631] (CanLII) | 12 years | The offender plead guilty to sexually assaulting his three daughters and a babysitter. "The abuse began when the daughters were each around the ages of 10. The abuse included sexual intercourse when they were between the ages of 13 - 15."}}
-R. v P.P.H., [http://canlii.ca/t/fjx 2003 BCCA 591] (CanLII), this Court upheld a 14-year sentence (two consecutive seven year sentences) for a 38-year-old offender who pleaded guilty to sexually offended against his two stepdaughters, aged 12 and 13.
+{{SCase1|R. v M.H., [http://canlii.ca/t/1lwwh 2005 BCCA 510] (CanLII)| 6 years |"the accused sexually offended against his stepdaughter for 10 years, starting in 1958 when she was five years old."}}
-R. v G.T.M. (1995), 61 BCAC 158, this Court upheld a 12-year sentence (two consecutive six-year sentences) for an accused who pleaded guilty to sexually offending against his two daughters in their mid-teens.
+{{SCase1|R. v P.P.H., [http://canlii.ca/t/fjx 2003 BCCA 591] (CanLII)| 14 years (global)<Br> 7 years (sex assault x 2)| "a 38-year-old offender who pleaded guilty to sexually offended against his two stepdaughters, aged 12 and 13."}}
-R. v R.A.J., [http://canlii.ca/t/2bdsv 2010 BCCA 304] (CanLII), this Court upheld the accused’s eight-year sentence for sexually offending against his daughter for seven years, starting when she was seven years old.
+{{SCase1|R. v D.L.M., [http://canlii.ca/t/4zgz 2001 BCCA 266] (CanLII)|  5 years | "the accused digitally penetrated a three and a half year old girl who was living with him as her “Daddy”. The sexual offence caused bodily harm."}}
-In R. v D.L.M., [http://canlii.ca/t/4zgz 2001 BCCA 266] (CanLII), this Court upheld a five-year sentence where the accused digitally penetrated a three and a half year old girl who was living with him as her “Daddy”. The sexual offence caused bodily harm.
+{{SCase1|R. v G.P.W. (1998), 106 BCAC 239 {{NOCANLII}} | 20 years  | }}
-R. v G.P.W. (1998), 106 BCAC 239, this Court upheld a 20-year sentence (two consecutive 10 year sentences) for an offender who physically
+{{SCase1|R v RPF, <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1mpv4 1996 CanLII 5590] (NS CA) |1 year | }}
--->
-{{SCase1|R v KVE, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g246f 2013 BCCA 521] (CanLII) | 10 years | }}
-{{SCase1|R v RPF, <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1mpv4 1996 CanLII 5590] (NS CA) |1 year | }}
+{{SCase1|R. v G.T.M. (1995), 61 BCAC 158{{NOCANLII}} |12 years | "an accused who pleaded guilty to sexually offending against his two daughters in their mid-teens."}}
-{{SCase1|R v Goler <Br>(1985), 67 N.S.R. (2d) 200 | 5 years | }}
+{{SCase1|R v Goler <Br>(1985), 67 N.S.R. (2d) 200{{NOCANLII}} | 5 years | }}
-{{SCase1|R v Comtois<Br> (1982), 62 CCC (2d) 567 | S/S | }}
+{{SCase1|R v Comtois<Br> (1982), 62 CCC (2d) 567, [http://canlii.ca/t/gd70h 1981 CanLII 3183] (QC CA) | S/S | }}
 {{SCaseEnd}}