| Case Name |
Prv. |
Crt. |
Sentence |
Summary
|
| R v O'Mara, 2020 ABPC 201 (CanLII) |
AB |
PC |
suspended sentence |
The judge said it was "considering a sentence of imprisonment".
|
| R v Sevigny, 2019 ABPC 81 (CanLII) |
AB |
PC |
$1,500 fine, probation of 12 months, and 50 hours of community service |
"transit peace officer used a harsh take-down maneuver, with no justification, against a jaywalking citizen, who suffered relatively minor injuries"... "[The complainant] was facing away from the accused [transit officer] when this maneuver was undertaken and offered no physical resistance. It appeared from the evidence that it took him by surprise. He did not break his fall in any manner and was easily taken down. He struck his head forcefully on the sidewalk, which produced a significant laceration on his forehead."
|
| R v Baxter, 2018 ONCJ 608 (CanLII), per O'Donnell J |
ON |
PC |
conditional discharge |
"During an arrest, the officer, with no justification, pushed the arrestee face-first into and along a fence and then “grounded” the arrestee, causing facial cuts."
|
| R v Lofroth, 2016 BCPC 429 (CanLII), per de Walle J |
BC |
PC |
suspended |
The offender was transporting the complainant from his vehicle to booking and used excessive force in the process.
|
| R v Bal, 2013 BCPC 21 (CanLII), per Fratkin J |
BC |
PC |
Suspended Sentence |
RCMP officer hit a detainee in the head and pushed his face into asphalt.
|
| R v Lozada, 2013 ONCJ 770 (CanLII), per Perkins-McVey J |
ON |
PC |
CSO |
The offender was a caregiver for elderly. He assaulted a 90 year old patient.
|
| R v Thomas, 2012 ONSC 6653 (CanLII), per Code J |
ON |
SC |
90 days |
the accused "was found to have been justified in arresting and using “one or two punches” to subdue a dangerous driver, but who continued (absent justification) with multiple punches against the non-resistant arrestee, causing a broken jaw". The case "involved an off-duty police officer. While off-duty, the accused was driving home with his girlfriend and two young daughters when a car driven by the complainant came up from behind at a high rate of speed, flashed its lights and followed closely. The complainant’s car first passed the accused’s car, and then cut him off requiring the accused to take evasive action in order to avoid an accident. The accused eventually pulled over and arrested the complainant for dangerous driving, and a physical altercation ensued. At trial, the force applied during the arrest was found to be excessive. The accused was convicted of assault causing bodily harm, and initially sentenced to a period of 90 days in jail, to be served intermittently. An appeal of sentence was allowed, and a sentence of one-year probation with 100 hours of community work service was substituted due to the fact that the accused was an unusually skilled police officer that had served his community in an exceptional way."
|
| R v Ens and Moyse, 2011 MBQB 301 (CanLII), per Schulman J |
MB |
SC |
4 months CSO (Ens)
4 months jail (Moyse) |
The offenders performed an unlawful arrest of the complainant and Moyse struck them multiple times.
|
| R v Lepine, 2010 ABPC 374 (CanLII), per Rosborough J |
AB |
PC |
4 months CSO |
|
| R v Eegeesiak, 2010 NUCJ 10 (CanLII), per Veale J |
NU |
PC |
suspended |
"an Inuk RCMP officer entered a guilty plea to two charges of assault. On two separate occasions, the accused had assaulted two Inuit men who were in police custody. The accused was posted in his home community of Iqaluit where he frequently policed relatives, friends and families that he had known all his life. Both of the complainants in the case had had what the accused considered to be negative interactions with relatives of the accused. The assaultive behaviour by the accused included choking and pushing that resulted in one of the complainant’s head being repeatedly banged on a table. The accused was given a suspended sentence with a period of probation of one year on each charge to be served concurrently."
|
| R v Lambert, 2010 BCPC 151 (CanLII), per Gardner J |
BC |
PC |
|
"a police officer was found guilty of assaulting a prisoner in his custody. The sentencing judge found that it was not a situation that required the implementation of force. The accused was sentenced to a conditional discharged with 25 hours of community work service."
|
| R v Byrne, 2009 ONCA 134 (CanLII), per Feldman JA |
ON |
CA |
90 days |
|
R v Carrigan,
2009 CanLII 59434 (NL PC), [2009] NJ No 305 (P.C.), per Pike J |
NL |
PC |
|
correctional officer assaults inmate causing bodily harm, public trust, discharge rejected
|
| R v Gillan, 2009 BCPC 241 (CanLII), per Watchuk J |
BC |
PC |
21 days CSO |
|
| R v Peters, 2008 BCSC 1839 (CanLII), per Powers J |
BC |
SC |
6 months CSO |
accused believed the complainant had information about the theft and location of the still missing bicycle. While on duty, the accused located the complainant, asked him to get into his police cruiser, and drove him to another location to meet up with another officer. After letting the complainant out of the vehicle, the accused demanded to know where the other bicycle was, and then punched the complainant three times in the face and also struck him in the torso with his knee. While in the car, the complainant had become agitated and angry, punched the silent patrolman, and was verbally abusive. However, when the complainant was let out, he did not make any aggressive move or gesture towards the accused. The accused was sentenced to a conditional sentence of 6 months and 50 hours of community work service. A DNA order and a firearms prohibition were also imposed.
|
| R v Feeney et al, 2008 ONCA 756 (CanLII), per curiam |
ON |
CA |
30 to 60 days |
|
| R v Sweet, 2007 BCPC 240 (CanLII), per Weitzel J |
BC |
PC |
conditional discharge |
"a person was arrested following a dangerous, high speed car chase that involved police from several municipalities. The complainant, the driver of the vehicle, was injured when he lost control of the car causing it to leave the roadway. The complainant was unresponsive and taken from the car by the accused. The accused laid the complainant prone, handcuffed him, and then kicked him in the head with significant force. The accused police officer pled guilty at an early stage to a charge of assault causing bodily harm. The accused also took significant, self-initiated steps towards rehabilitation, such as counselling and anger management programs, at his own expense. The circumstances were highly emotional and dangerous, as it involved a high-speed chase that lasted many, many miles and many lives were put in jeopardy. The accused was given a conditional discharge and 100 hours of community work service."
|
| R v DED, 2007 ABQB 508 (CanLII), per Rooke J |
AB |
SC |
conditional discharge |
The case "involves guilty pleas of assault and uttering threats by the accused, a 23-year member of the RCMP, against his daughter and her friend. The daughter of the accused had been caught using drugs and had run away. While the accused was not home, his daughter and her friends stole his vehicle and were arrested. The accused and his wife went to the RCMP detachment, and upon seeing his daughter’s friends in cells, the accused stated that he would “break their necks” if they ever stole anything of his again. When seeing his daughter, the accused found her to be defiant and gave her a “cuff” to the side of the head. The accused later returned to find his wife and daughter in an altercation, and being emotional and fearful that his daughter would run away again, he put his right hand on her neck and pushed her back and held her without restricting her breathing. The accused was initially sentenced to a fine of $500 on each count, and on appeal was granted a conditional discharge."
|
| R v Reddy, 2007 BCPC 401 (CanLII), per Giardini J |
BC |
PC |
conditional discharge |
"an off-duty RCMP officer was found guilty of assault. The accused had been off-duty and socializing with other off-duty officers at a restaurant when the accused believed that another group of men, including the complainant, were making gestures at him and his friends and were encouraging him and his friends to fight with them. When the accused went outside to speak with the men, the group turned towards the accused and were carrying weapons including a baseball bat, a baton and a sword. The complainant ran towards the accused with the sword in the air. The accused went back into the restaurant and then pursued the men in his personal vehicle while calling 911 to request police assistance. When the group’s car was stopped and the individuals were removed from it, the accused entered into a physical altercation with the complainant. The trial judge found that the accused had grabbed the complainant’s jacket and that there was some other pushing or touching, but also found that the grabbing did not involve a significant amount of force. A conditional discharge was imposed as well as 30 hours of community work service."
|
| R v Ens, 2006 ABPC 164 (CanLII), per JDB McDonald J |
AB |
PC |
CSO |
The offender was a security guard
|
| R v Tait, 2005 BCPC 273 (CanLII), per Ellan |
BC |
PC |
suspended |
"involved a police officer who was convicted of assault causing bodily harm. The officer had arrested the complainant and put him into his police vehicle when the complainant spat in the face of the officer. The officer responded with three quick blows to the jaw of the complainant, breaking his jaw. Baird Ellan J. found that while the complainant was not physically confrontative; he was a difficult person, clearly antagonistic, and had challenged the officers both verbally and with body language. The officer’s three quick blows were found to be the direct and immediate response to the complainant spitting in his face, and the case was viewed as being more similar to those involving a fleeting or heated reaction rather than a campaign of gratuitous aggression. The accused was given a suspended sentence with 18 months probation and 40 hours of community work service. "
|
| R v Dugdale, [2005 OJ No 5690] |
ON |
|
"a 5-year member of the police assaulted a detainee who was in the police station because he needed to give a breath sample. The detainee was being very uncooperative, at times argumentative and perhaps “playacting” throughout the process, and the officer became very frustrated. At one point, the officer grabbed the detainee by the throat and later used his boot to push the detainee’s leg off of a chair, which caused the detainee to roll to the floor. The sentencing judge found that no great degree of force was applied by the accused; there was nothing that actually constituted a “kick”, and that there are no allegations of injury. The accused was sentenced to a conditional discharge with 100 hours of community service." |
{{{5}}}
|
| R v Langlois, 2004 BCPC 195 (CanLII), per Bagnall J |
BC |
PC |
21 days CSO |
"an on-duty police officer was discussing traffic violation notices with the complainant when the complainant insulted the officer with an obscenity. In response, the officer grabbed the complainant, dragged him in a headlock into the detachment, struggled with him, and choked him. While the accused expressed regret for the upset to his family, he did not offer an apology to the victim or express regret for his actions. A letter from a psychologist indicated that, at the time of the events, the officer was under considerable stress due to a number of illnesses in the family, and Bagnall J. accepted that there may well be a connection between those difficulties and the aberrant nature of the behaviour. The accused was convicted of assault, and sentenced to a conditional sentence order of 21 days. No firearms prohibition was ordered."
|
| R v Williams, 2004 ONCJ 261 (CanLII), per Agro J |
ON |
PC |
CSO |
The offender assaulted the victim while on duty as peace officer
|
| R v MacDonald, [1996 AJ No 1099] |
AB |
PC |
fine |
"the accused, a police officer, was a first-time offender with a laudable record over his 15 years of public service. The accused struck the complainant at a vulnerable time, because the complainant was intoxicated and her hands were handcuffed behind her back. Crowe J. found that the complainant had provoked the blow in question by kicking the accused in the back of the head and by launching into a tirade of vulgar verbal abuse. The blow by the accused was found to be unpremeditated. Fines of $300 and $400 were respectively imposed against two counts of assault. No firearms prohibition was ordered."
|
| R v Grant, [1995 AJ No 148] |
AB |
CA |
one day jail and fine |
"Police officer entered guilty plea to allegation of using pepper spray on a jailed inmate facing an Impaired Driving charge. Police Officer had been trained in the use of the spray and after deploying it, he did not decontaminate the complainant. The victim suffered a non-permanent injury. The issue of Court concern was the Crown request to impose a weapons ban. The appeal was allowed to the extent that a s.100 weapons ban was granted but the lower Court sentence was upheld."
|
| R v Nixon, 1991 CanLII 905 (BC CA), per Cumming JA |
BC |
CA |
9 months imprisonment |
|
| R v Cline, [1990 AJ No 1200], per Porter J |
AB |
PC |
30 days |
"involved an on-duty officer who attended a house with another officer to remove the complainant from the front doorstep of his former girlfriend. When the complainant was unwilling to leave, the accused used his baton to deliver a number of blows to the hand of the victim who was hanging onto the front door handle of the house. At the time of the blows, the other officer had secured the complainant in an arm lock, and the complainant did not display or threaten any violence toward the officers. Porter J. found absolutely no provocation that led to the degree of force used. The accused was convicted of assault causing bodily harm..."
|
| R v Bottrell, 1981 CanLII 352 (BC CA), per Laycraft JA |
BC |
CA |
45 days |
|
| R v Canada (RCMP), [1981 BCJ 856] (BCCA) |
BC |
CA |
45 days |
"the accused, a police officer, kicked a prisoner in the face and fractured the prisoner’s cheekbone. At the time, the prisoner was on the ground, defenceless and presented no threat to the officer or others. The accused was convicted of assault causing bodily harm, and initially sentenced to 3 months imprisonment. On appeal, the sentence was reduced to 45 days, to be served intermittently."
|
R v Cusack,
1978 CanLII 2283 (NS CA), , [1978] NSJ No 538, 41 CCC (2d) 289 (CA), per Hart JA |
NS |
CA |
|
|
R v Griffin,
1975 CanLII 1430 (PE SCAD), [1975 PEIJ No 64], {{{4}}} |
PEI |
CA |
absolute discharge |
"involves a police officer who was found guilty of assault against a detainee by striking him in the face and eye with a “billy stick”. The complainant was arrested for creating a disturbance in a well-known motel, and it was very difficult for officers to first, get him into the police car, and then out of the police car and into the jail building. It was during the time that the accused was trying to get the difficult complainant into the cellblock that he struck the complainant with his “billy stick”. The accused was initially given a suspended sentence, which was varied to an absolute discharge on appeal. On appeal, it was found that the trial judge gave undue weight to the actual results of the assault rather than the probable results."
|
