| Case Name |
Prv. |
Crt. |
Sentence |
Summary
|
| R v Ellis, 2023 NSCA 63 (CanLII), per Van den Eynden J (2:1) |
NS  |
CA |
|
|
| R v Al Aazawi, 2022 ABCA 361 (CanLII), per curiam |
AB  |
CA |
8 years imprisonment |
|
| R v RM, 2022 ONSC 6662 (CanLII), per Conlan J |
ON  |
SC |
|
" an attempted abduction resulting in a conviction under s. 280(1) of the Code warranted a sentence of 12 months in custody, less credit for time already served, followed by probation for three years. A father attempted to abduct his son from outside of his son’s school. He grabbed his son and attempted to draw him to a car before bystanders intervened to separate the two." (Quoting from R v Ellis, 2023 NSCA 63 (CanLII))
|
| R v Rodrigues, 2019 ONSC 2752 (CanLII), per Edwards J |
ON |
SC |
|
|
| R v Blackmore, 2017 BCSC 1426 (CanLII), per Pearlman J |
BC  |
SC |
|
"a completed abduction resulting in a conviction under section 283(1) of the Code attracted a sentence of 15 months in custody and house arrest (with enhanced credit) and a three-year probationary period. However, the father was also convicted of other offences arising from the total series of events and his sentence was not divided up among the different convictions. The father abducted his daughter from the mother’s house in the middle of the night after breaking in and assaulting the mother. He fled with the daughter in his car and eventually ended up in a high-speed car accident, causing injuries to both him and his daughter."
|
| R v ME, 2016 ABPC 250 (CanLII), per Lamoureux J |
AB |
PC |
|
|
| R v CAS, 2016 BCPC 162 (CanLII), per Pothecary J |
BC |
PC |
|
|
| R v CML, 2016 ONSC 4406 (CanLII)Template:Per |
ON |
SC |
|
Mother taken child out of Canada and refused to return child. She also prohibited any contact between father and child.
|
| R v Levin, 2014 SKCA 66 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA |
{{}} |
|
|
|
| R v O’Byrne, 2013 ONCJ 171 (CanLII), per Greene J |
ON |
PC |
2 years less a day CSO + Prob. |
The offender was a mother who disappeared with her 2-year-old child and hid from child's father in British Columbia under assumed names for 18 years. The child was subject to a custody order at the time. see also [1]
|
| R v Chen, 2013 NBCA 7 (CanLII), per curiam |
NB  |
CA |
3 months CSO + Prob. |
The offender abducted his own child contrary to a family court order.
|
| R v Melville, 2011 ONSC 5697 (CanLII), per Ducharme J |
ON |
|
|
"a completed abduction resulting in a conviction under s. 282 of the Code attracted a sentence of six months imprisonment followed by two years of probation and 120 hours of community service. The father abducted the child and moved to the United States with the child for 12 years. There was a court order in place at the time under which the mother had custody of the child and the father had access on alternating weekends. The family court had also ordered that neither parent could remove the child from Toronto without the consent of the other parent. The judge stated that “given the nature, duration and consequences of this abduction, an actual custodial sentence [was] required.” (at para. 29)"
|
| R v Gill, 2008 BCPC 58 (CanLII), per Gordon J |
BC |
PC |
|
|
| R v JV, 2008 BCPC 307 (CanLII), per Challenger J |
BC |
PC |
|
|
| R v MDP, 2007 BCPC 153 (CanLII), per Dyer J |
BC |
PC |
|
"the father refused to return his 4½ year old daughter to her mother following an overnight scheduled access visit, later alleging that his daughter had disclosed that members of her mother’s family were sexually abusing her. This was in the context of a bitter custody dispute between the parents. He was arrested about five days later and disclosed his daughter’s whereabouts that same day when ordered to do so. During those five days, the daughter spoke to her mother several times by telephone. He had a prior criminal record, some of which related to difficulties with the mother. The Crown sought a custodial sentence of between 60 and 90 days and opposed a conditional sentence order. Defence counsel sought a short custodial sentence of perhaps two weeks or a 60 to 90 day sentence to be served conditionally. The court accepted that a conditional sentence order could provide a significant amount of denunciation and deterrence with properly crafted terms, and sentenced the father to 90 days to be served by means of a conditional sentence order plus two years’ probation."
|
| R v Nathalie Gettliffe-Grant, 2006 BCSC 1944 (CanLII), per Koenigsberg J |
BC |
SC |
|
|
| R v Urbiola, 2006 BCPC 551 (CanLII), per Romilly J |
BC |
PC |
|
|
| R v Goudreault, 2005 ABQB 699 (CanLII), per Martin J |
AB |
QB |
|
|
| R v A(M), [2002] JQ no 2844 (CA)(*no CanLII links)
|
QC  |
CA |
|
|
| R v Jacome, 2002 BCCA 15 (CanLII)Template:Per |
BC |
CA |
|
"the child had lived with the mother since birth with the father having regular weekly or semi-weekly access. When the boy was five, following a dispute, the mother denied access to the father so he went to court for court-ordered access. He served the mother with his application in May and the matter was set for hearing in August. Sometime later in May, he became aware that she had cancelled her telephone and bank account so he became concerned about the whereabouts of his son. In August, he obtained an ex parte order for sole custody of which she became aware. He continued his efforts through the courts to obtain information regarding the whereabouts of his son throughout which she repeatedly refused to provide any information herself despite the court’s exhortations. She was arrested the following July and remanded in custody until October 1st when she finally surrendered the boy to his father. The father had not seen his son for about 21 months. At the time of sentencing, he was living with his father and attending school. A conditional sentence was rejected, “on the ground that it would not satisfy the denunciatory requirement of an adequate sentence and general deterrence.” The court also rejected a conditional discharge. A sentence of three months in jail plus 3 months’ probation was upheld on appeal with no credit for the time she spent in custody prior to surrendering the boy." [2]
|
| R v Butler, 1998 CanLII 1252 (NS SC), per Carver J |
NS |
SC |
|
"a completed abduction attracted a conditional discharge followed by one year of probation, 240 hours of community service, and the offender was required to make a charitable donation. At the end of her access period with the child, without warning the mother took the child with her to the airport. They travelled to Texas and were not heard from again until the mother was arrested and returned to Nova Scotia 17 years later. ... The judge in that case noted the offence was not a prevalent offence in that area (at para. 18). Similarly, in this case there is no evidence the offence is prevalent in the area where the child or Ms. Ellis live."
|
| R v Lewis, [1998] O.J. No. 46(*no CanLII links)
|
ON |
|
|
|
| R v Mendez, 1997 CanLII 432 (ON CA), per Osborne JA |
ON |
CA |
|
"the father had two children with the mother as well as her eldest child, his stepson. Although the relationship had ended they continued to share a home for financial reasons. Near the end of June, the father took the children, then aged 7, 5 and 3, for the weekend with the mother’s consent. At the end of the weekend, he telephoned the mother and told her he would not be returning the children until the end of the summer, if ever. She immediately obtained an ex parte interim custody order. A few weeks later he telephoned her and told her the children were fine but refused to disclose their location. Charges were laid and a warrant was issued for the father’s arrest. He was apprehended in New Jersey at his sister’s residence where he and the children had been living. They had been gone for 77 days. During the period after their return, the children continued to exhibit signs of psychological trauma from the experience. Crown counsel sought a sentence of 12 months plus probation, not to be served by conditional sentence order; defence counsel argued for 3 to 6 months, to be served by way of conditional sentence order. A conditional sentence order was rejected as not being sufficiently denunciatory. The sentence imposed was 2 months custody for the two biological children and 2 months consecutive for the step son, plus three years probation." [3]
|
