Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Criminal Law Notebook
Disclaimers
Search
Admissibility Checklist
Language
Watch
View source
Revision as of 21:41, 6 February 2019 by
Admin
(
talk
|
contribs
)
(
→Relevance and Materiality
)
(
diff
)
← Older revision
|
Latest revision
(
diff
) |
Newer revision →
(
diff
)
Contents
1
All Evidence
2
Hearsay
3
Prior Statement of Accused
4
Disreputable Conduct
5
Documentary Evidence
6
Images and Video
7
Relevance and Materiality
All Evidence
General Admission
☐
Identify one or more propositions that are sought to be proven by the evidence
☐
Does the evidence make the proposition more likely to be true
☐
Is the evidence material to an legal element of proof or issue to be determined in the case
☐
Is the proposition collateral, possibly excluded for collateral fact rule
Discretionary Exclusion
☐
prejudice outweighs probative value
(time consumed, affect on trial fairness)
General Exclusionary Rules
☐
Not
relevant or material
☐
Hearsay
☐
does any type of
privilege
apply (spousal,
solicitor
, litigation, public interest, informer, settlement)
☐
Opinion
evidence
☐
Prior
Consistent Statements
, with no other relevance
☐
Character Evidence
(i.e. prepensity evidence)
☐
Collateral Facts
☐
Compelled Statements of Accused
☐
Prior
sexual history
of victim
(for enumerated offences)
Hearsay
☐
Is it a statement or an implied assertion
☐
Is it intended for the truth of what is being said or some other purpose
Principled Exception
☐
is the person who made statement able to be meaningfully cross examined
☐
is the context of the statement suggesting that it is trustworthy (motivation for accuracy, sufficient testing of evidence)
Prior Statement of Accused
☐
is it excludable as a prior consistent statement
Disreputable Conduct
Documentary Evidence
☐
CEA Business Records
☐
Notice, Affidavit
☐
CEA Financial Records
☐
Affidavit
☐
Common law business records
☐
principled Admission
Images and Video
See also:
Electronic Documents
Authenticate Recording
Either:
☐
Person who created the record can vouch for authenticity
☐
Person who observed the creation of the record on the electronic device
☐
Person who observed the record on the device and any time-stamp associated with the record (authenticity inferred from circumstances)
☐
Evidence of circumstancial reliability of the device
Establish Creation Time
Either:
☐
Person who created the record can vouch for time
☐
Person who observed the creation of the record on the electronic device
☐
Person who observed the record on the device and any time-stamp associated with the record (authenticity inferred from circumstances)
☐
Evidence of circumstancial reliability of the device
Relevance and Materiality
Actus Reus and Circumstances
☐
Observation of incident or circumstances surrounding the incident
☐
Propensity of the accused to engage in conduct similar to the offence (
Similar Fact Evidence
)
☐
Real evidence of items collected by police
☐
Recognition of the real evidence as sourced from circumstances surrounding the incident
☐
Recognition of accused as the culprit
Mens Rea
☐
Observed utterances/conduct
of accused
to infer an awareness of circumstances OR intention
☐
before incident
☐
during incident
☐
after incident (
Post-Offence Conduct
)