| Case Name |
Result |
Summary
|
| R v Tyler Perkins, 2013 ONSC 1807 (CanLII), per Ferguson J |
evidence excluded |
S. 8, 9, 10(b) of Charter raised.
|
| R v Giuseppe Michienzi, 2013 ONSC 1025 (CanLII), per Bryant J |
guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available |
|
| R v Douglas, 2013 SKQB 33 (CanLII), per Schwann J |
guilty of poss'n and making avail. |
through treatment of evidence and law
|
| R v Lorenz, 2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII), per Schwann J |
acquitted for making CP |
|
| R v Jacques, 2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII), per McMurtry J |
guilty of possession and not guilty of making available |
P2P case
|
| R v Clayton, 2012 ABQB 196 (CanLII), per Eidsvik J |
conviction |
gigatribe distribution
|
| R v Allart, 2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII), per Groberman JA |
conviction for poss’n CP |
|
| R v Jeffrey, 2012 SKPC 12 (CanLII), per Agnew J |
guilty of distributing |
|
| R v Wanamaker, 2011 ABQB 310 (CanLII), per H McDonald J |
guilty |
|
| R v SS, 2011 SKPC 102 (CanLII), per Koskie J |
not guilty |
judge could not determine age of youths in images
|
| R v Carrano, 2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII), per Trotter J |
acquittal for innocent possession of CP |
|
| R v Jones, 2011 ONCA 632 (CanLII), per Blair JA |
|
new trial ordered
|
| R v Smith, 2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII), per Brown J |
|
|
| R v Love, 2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII), per Philp J |
not guilty |
not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession
|
| R v RD, 2010 BCCA 313 (CanLII), per Bennett JA |
not guilty |
|
| R v Garbett, 2010 ONSC 2762 (CanLII), per Tulloch J |
|
|
| R v Spencer, 2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA |
conviction upheld |
|
| R v Leugner, 2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII), per Keene J |
|
accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books
|
| R v Leugner, 2010 SKPC 50 (CanLII), per Kovatch J |
guilty of importing and possession |
fictional stories of child sexual abuse
|
| R v Rudiger, 2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII), per Blaskovits J |
guilty |
possession; considered definition
|
| R v Pressacco, 2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII), per Currie J |
guilty of possessing and accessing CP |
|
| R v CM, 2009 MBPC 35 (CanLII), per Martin J |
guilty of making and possessing CP |
|
| R v Grant, 2009 BCCA 72 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty |
|
| R v Trapp, 2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII), per Kolenick J |
conviction for making CP available |
|
| R v Ballendine, 2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII), per Cullen J |
not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else |
|
| R v Johannson, 2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J |
guilty of making available |
|
| R v Dittrich, 2008 CanLII 19217 (ON SC), per Jenkins J |
guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making |
|
| R v Dabrowski, 2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII), per MacPherson JA |
|
|
| R v Tripp, 2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII), per Arseneault J |
not guilty for possession |
|
| R v Horvat, 2006 CanLII 13426 (ON SC), per Lack J |
guilty |
|
| R v Beattie, 2005 CanLII 10273 (ON CA), per Laskin JA |
acquittal overturned |
pornographic stories
|
| R v JEI, 2005 BCCA 584 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty |
considers dominant purpose
|
| R v S(VP), 2001 BCSC 619 (CanLII), per Bauman J |
guilty |
considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose
|
| R v Nedelec, 2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII), per Wedge J |
guilty of possession |
considers definition
|
| R v Weir, 1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII), per PLJ Smith J |
guilty of distribution |
|
