Drug Trafficking, Schedule I (Sentencing)
|Drug Trafficking, Schedule I|
|s. 5(1), (2) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act|
|Election / Plea|
Sup. Court w/ Jury (*)
|Types of Release||Judicial Release Only|
Trafficking in substance
5. (1) No person shall traffic in a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV or in any substance represented or held out by that person to be such a substance.
Possession for purpose of trafficking
(2) No person shall, for the purpose of trafficking, possess a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV.
(3) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2)
- (a) subject to paragraph (a.1), if the subject matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule I or II, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life, and
- (i) to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year if
- (A) the person committed the offence for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization, as defined in subsection 467.1(1) of the Criminal Code,
- (B) the person used or threatened to use violence in committing the offence,
- (C) the person carried, used or threatened to use a weapon in committing the offence, or
- (D) the person was convicted of a designated substance offence, or had served a term of imprisonment for a designated substance offence, within the previous 10 years, or
- (ii) to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of two years if
- (A) the person committed the offence in or near a school, on or near school grounds or in or near any other public place usually frequented by persons under the age of 18 years,
- (B) the person committed the offence in a prison, as defined in section 2 of the Criminal Code, or on its grounds, or
- (C) the person used the services of a person under the age of 18 years, or involved such a person, in committing the offence;
(5) For the purposes of applying subsection (3) in respect of an offence under subsection (1), a reference to a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV includes a reference to any substance represented or held out to be a substance included in that Schedule.
1996, c. 19, s. 5; 2012, c. 1, s. 39.
Sentencing Principles and Ranges
- For General Sentencing Principles for all drug offences, see Sentencing for Drug Offences
Offences under s. 5(3)(a) are straight indictable. The maximum penalty is life.
For offences under s. 5(3)(a) or (a.1) there is a mandatory minimum penalty of 1 year or 2 years incarceration.
s. 718.3, 787
| Custody and
| Custody and
| Conditional |
There are no statutory requirements that the sentences be consecutive.
There is a distinction made in law between hard drugs (such as cocaine) and soft drugs (such as marijuana).
The societal costs of drug abuse and trafficking are significant. They include the effects on health care, lost productivity and financial loss due to enforcement.
Schedule I drugs, including cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamines, are "highly addictive and inflict great harm on individuals and society. Trafficking in these drugs is rightly considered a serious offence". 
The destructive nature of methamphetamines “mirror those of two other hard drugs, heroin and cocaine”.
Fentanyl is considered one of the "most highly addictive and dangerous drugs" and so objectives in sentencing should focus on general deterrence and denunciation.
It has been suggested that only in "exceptional circumstances" should a sentence be outside of the normal range of jail. These circumstances can take the form of the existence of "multiple mitigating factors".
Smuggling any amount of drugs into a correctional facility is an aggravating factor.
- R v Tuck, 2007 ONCA 495 (CanLII),  O.J. No. 2626 (C.A.) at para 2
R v Wellington, 1999 CanLII 3054 (ON CA), (1999), 132 CCC (3d) 470 (Ont. C.A.) at 476
R v Cunningham, 1996 CanLII 1311 (ON CA), (1996), 104 CCC (3d) 542 (Ont. C.A.) at 547
- Pushpanathan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1998 CanLII 778 (SCC),  1 SCR 982, at pp. 1039-1040
see R v Aitkens, 2004 BCCA 411 (CanLII) at para 7: "Drug trafficking has become a blight in our society"
R v Beaudry, 2000 ABCA 243 (CanLII), (2002), 37 C.R. (5th) 1 (Alta. C.A.) at para 158 and 165 ("The damage to the community from trafficking in cocaine is substantial, and extends well beyond the offender and his prospective customers ... it contributes to a variety of other offences, with the potential for extremely serious health and economic consequences. Drug trafficking remains a serious problem in Canada.")
R v Woolcock,  OJ No 4927(*no link) at para 8 (“There is no dispute that crack cocaine is an extremely dangerous and insidious drug with potential to cause a great deal of harm to individuals and to society.”)
R v Daya, 2007 ONCA 693 (CanLII), 227 CCC (3d) 367, at para 18
R v Harris, 2008 CanLII 23493 (ON SC),  O.J. No. 1976 (S.C.J.), at paras 21-22
R v Johnson, 2010 BCCA 57 (CanLII),  BCJ No. 301 (C.A.) at para 29 ("correctly took into account the serious effect that cocaine has on fellow citizens and [the offender's] role in spreading this 'disease'.")
R v Sem (S.), 2005 MBQB 208 (CanLII) at paras 37-38
- R v Hamilton, 2004 CanLII 5549 (ON CA), (2004), 72 O.R. (3d) 1, at para 104
- R. v. Lloyd, 2016 SCC 13 (CanLII) at para 26 per McLachlin CJ
- R v Villanueva, 2007 ONCJ 87 (CanLII) at para 27
see also R v Nguyen, 2011 ONSC 6229 (CanLII) at para 41 (“The danger of methamphetamine to human life is becoming uncontrovertibly clear.”)
R v Lu, 2016 ONCA 479 (CanLII) at para 9
R v Al-Amiri, 2015 NLCA 37 (CanLII), per Barry JA, at para 61
R v Sawatsky, 2007 ABCA 353 (CanLII)
R v Maskill, (1981), 1981 ABCA 50 (CanLII), 29 A.R. 107, 58 CCC (2nd) 408 at para 20 and
R v Rahime, 2001 ABCA 203 (CanLII)
R v Peters (R.N.), 2015 MBCA 119 (CanLII), 323 Man.R. (2d) 237
R v Tran (A.), 2015 MBCA 120 (CanLII), per Monnin JA
R v Racca (R.A.), 2015 MBCA 121 (CanLII)
Tran, supra at para 24
R v Voong (D.M.) et al., 2015 BCCA 285 (CanLII) at para 59
R v Taylor, 2013 SKCA 33 (CanLII) at para 15, 16
Sentencing ranges vary between provinces. In Nova Scotia, an appropriate sentence for trafficking of Schedule I substances will range will typically span from 3 to 5 years. As such, conditional sentences are rarely available.
In Saskatchewan, the range is between 18 months to 4 years for trafficking.
In Newfoundland, trafficking in small quantities of cocaine is a sentence in the range of 6 to 18 months.
However, it is not unreasonable in certain exceptional circumstances to have sentences below two years. The starting point for commercial trafficking in cocaine in small quantities is three years for most provinces.
In Manitoba, there are several recognized levels of trafficking in cocaine:
- Low (street dealer): sentences typically start at less than two years and can range up to four years. 
- Low-Mid (mere courier): sentences for couriers can be between 3 to 6 years.
- Mid (more than mere courier of large quantities): sentences typically range from 5 to 8 years if they are an insider, while couriers are in the range of 3 to 6 years.
- High: (multi-kilogram trafficker): sentences typically range from 8 to 12 years
It has been further suggested that “a person who traffics in a sophisticated manner at a kilogram level should, absent significant mitigating factors, expect no less a penalty than 10 years' incarceration. It should not matter whether that drug is cocaine or methamphetamine.” 
In Ontario, for possession of "a substantial amount of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking" the range is usually 5 to 5.5 years even with a guilty plea and no record.
The Ontario "normal" range for "someone, without a record, convicted of possession for the purpose of trafficking in slightly more than a pound [or 453.59 grams] of cocaine".
In Ontario, the range of sentencing for trafficking in small amounts of crack cocaine is 6 months to 2 years less a day.
Manitoba court has stated that the mid-level drug deal has a range of sentence between 7 to 8 years.
Large amounts of Drugs (1kg+)
The range of sentence for trafficking of cocaine in the amounts of 1 kg or more will typically see sentences in the range of 5 years. Larger amounts upward of 3 kg will attract a range of 6 to 8 years.
The drug couriers' job is to transport drugs and protect their bosses from being detected.
R v Knickle, 2009 NSCA 59 (CanLII)
R v Conway, 2009 NSCA 95 (CanLII)
R v Aube, 2009 SKCA 53 (CanLII) at para 19
R v Shawile, 2012 SKCA 51 (CanLII)
R v Taylor, 2013 SKCA 33 (CanLII) at para 14
- R v Taylor, 2012 CanLII 1915 (NL SCTD) at para 12
- R v Dawe 2002 NSCA 147 (CanLII)
- R v Jamieson, 2011 NSCA 122 (CanLII) at para 38
- R v Ostertag, 2000 ABCA 232 (CanLII), 266 A.R. 57 at paras 12-16
R v Murphy (M.P.), 2011 MBCA 84 (CanLII)
R v Panko (D.), 148 Man.R. (2d) 138, 2000 MBCA 45 (CanLII)
R v Reid (B.A.C.), 1998 CanLII 17760 (MB CA), (1998), 131 Man.R. (2d) 153
R v Champagne (D.A.), 2000 MBCA 66 (CanLII) 148 Man.R. (2d) 104
AB: R v Maskill, (1981), 1981 ABCA 50 (CanLII), 29 A.R. 107, 58 CCC (2d) 408 (C.A.)
R v Rahime, 2001 ABCA 203 (CanLII), 286 A.R. 377 at para 26
R v Marchesi, 460 A.R. 294, 2009 ABCA 304 (CanLII) at para 4
R v McCulloch, 2011 ABCA 124 (CanLII) at para 8 - starting point sentence “for commercial trafficking in cocaine in small quantities”
R v Rainville, 2010 ABCA 288 (CanLII) at para 6
R v Chung, 1999 ABCA 86 (CanLII), (1999), 135 AR 351 (CA), 18 WCB (2d) 611
NS: R v Knickle, 2009 NSCA 59 (CanLII)
- R v Gilchrist, 2004 MBCA 21 (CanLII)
- R v Rocha, 2009 MBCA 26 (CanLII) at paras 61 to 64
R v Traimany (P.), 2011 MBCA 104 (CanLII), 270 Man.R. (2d) 291 at para 3
- R v Rocha at paras 61 to 64
- R v Oddleifson, 2010 MBCA 44 (CanLII)
- R v Grant, 2007 MBQB 13 (CanLII) at para 73
R v Bajada, 2003 CanLII 15687 (ON CA) at paras 12 to 14 per Weiler, JA.
R v Ovid, 2016 ONSC 2974 (CanLII), para 27
Ovid at para 27
R v Bryan, 2011 ONCA 273 (CanLII),  O.J. No. 1581, at paras 1-2
See also R. v Muise,  O.J. No. 5553 (C.J.) (*no link) at para 47, aff'd 2008 ONCA 665 (CanLII)
R v Peltier, 2013 ONCA 141 (CanLII) at para 15
R v Italiano, 2015 ONSC 2216 (CanLII),  O.J. No. 6459, at paras 25-31
R v Feeney, 2015 ONSC 3218 (CanLII),  O.J. No. 2584, at paras 32-40, 44-45, 55-68
R v Ceballos, 2015 ONSC 720 (CanLII),  O.J. No. 536, at paras 2, 5-12, 21-23
R v Woolcock  OJ No 4927(*no link) at 15
R v Madeiros,  OJ No 5664 (Ont. SCJ)(*no link)
R v Radassao, 1994 CanLII 779 (ON CA),  OJ No 1990 (ONCA)
- R v Rocha at para 64; R v Traimany, at para 3
- R v Bajada, 2003 CanLII 15687 (ON CA), (2003), 169 O.A.C. 226 (C.A.) at para 13
- R v Oraha, 2012 ONSC 1439 (CanLII) at para 31
- Traimany at para 3
Rocha at para 64
In Ontario and Newfoundland, the conditional sentence is available for trafficking in only rare cases. Those who are involved in a “dial-a-dope” operation will generally be sentenced to encarceration.
In Saskatchewan, conditional sentences are available for trafficking in hard drugs. The appropriateness of a conditional sentences depends on several factors:
- the sophistication and significance of the offence and the accused's place in it;
- the type and quantity of drug;
- the motivation for the offence: those who traffic to support their own habit may be more likely to receive a restorative disposition than those who traffic for other reasons;
- the need for and the utility of the deterrence which will be provided by the sentence imposed;
- the factors relating to the community like the significance of the problem; and,
- the age, lack of record and other personal circumstances of the accused.
The Code amendments concerning conditional sentences that came into force on November 6, 2012, prohibit conditional sentence for drug trafficking.
R v Ly, 1997 CanLII 2983 (ONCA) at 286 ("will be looked to only rarely in cases of drug trafficking")
R v Brown, 1997 CanLII 10869 (NL CA) at 155
- R v Sawatsky, 2007 ABCA 353 (CanLII) at para 4 ("We agree with the Crown that those who organize and manage "dial-a-dope" schemes to traffic in drugs, such as cocaine ... should usually be sentenced to terms of actual incarceration.")
- R v Pankewich, 2002 SKCA 7 (CanLII) at para 49
Mandatory minimums were added in November 6, 2012.
The one year mandatory minimum for conviction under s. 5(3)(a)(i)(D) was found to be unconstitutional.
- R v Lloyd, 2014 BCPC 11 (CanLII) - violates right against cruel and unusual punishment
Ancillary Sentencing Orders
|DNA Orders||s. 5(a) CDSA||
|Weapons Prohibition Orders||s. 5 CDSA||
Circumstance-specific Forfeiture Orders
|Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime (s. 462.37(1) or (2.01))||any||Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence under the Code or the CDSA in which property is "proceeds of crime" and offence was "committed in relation to that property", the property shall be forfeited to Her Majesty the Queen on application of the Crown.|
|Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture (s. 462.37(3))||any||Where a Court is satisfied an order for the forfeiture of proceeds of crime under s. 462.37(!) or (2.01) can be made, but that property cannot be "made subject to an order", then the Court "may" order a fine in "an amount equal to the value of the property". Failure to pay the fine will result in a default judgement imposing a period of incarceration.|
|Forfeiture of Weapons or Firearms (s. 491)||any||Where there is finding of guilt for an offence where a "weapon, an imitation firearm, a prohibited device, any ammunition, any prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance was used in the commission of [the] offence and that thing has been seized and detained", or "that a person has committed an offence that involves, or the subject-matter of which is, a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance has been seized and detained, that the item be an enumerated weapon or related item be connected to the offence", then there will be a mandatory forfeiture order. However, under s. 491(2), if the lawful owner "was not a party to the offence" and the judge has "no reasonable grounds to believe that the thing would or might be used in the commission of an offence", then it should be returned to the lawful owner.|
|Forfeiture of Offence-related Property (s. 490.1)||any||Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence, "any property is offence-related property" where (a) by means or in respect of which an indictable offence under this Act or the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act is committed, (b) that is used in any manner in connection with the commission of such an offence, or (c) that is intended to be used for committing such an offence". Such property is to be forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province.|
Other Sentencing Orders
|Non-communication order while offender in custody (s. 743.21)||any||The judge has discretion to order that the offender be prohibited "from communicating...with any victim, witness or other person" while in custody except where the judge "considers [it] necessary" to communicate with them.|
|Restitution Orders (s. 738)||any||A discretionary Order is available for things such as the replacement value of the property; the pecuniary damages incurred from harm, expenses fleeing a domestic partner; or certain expenses arising from the commission of an offence under s.402.2 or 403.|
|Victim Fine Surcharge (s. 737)||any||A mandatory surcharge under s. 737 of 30% of any fine order imposed, $100 per summary conviction or $200 per indictable conviction. If offence occurs on or after October 23, 2013, the order is discretionary based on ability to pay and the minimum amounts are smaller (15%, $50, or $100).|
- Offences by Penalty
- CDSA Schedules
- Drug Trafficking, Schedule II (Sentencing): Maximum penalty of life
- Drug Trafficking, Schedule III (Sentencing): Maximum penalty of 10 years
- Drug Trafficking, Schedule IV (Sentencing): Maximum penalty of 3 years