Assault with a Weapon or Causing Bodily Harm (Offence)
This page was last substantively updated or reviewed April 2020. (Rev. # 96350) |
Assault with a Weapon or Causing Bodily Harm | |
---|---|
s. 267 of the Crim. Code | |
Election / Plea | |
Crown Election | Hybrid summary proceedings must initiate within 12 months of the offence (786(2)) |
Jurisdiction | Prov. Court Sup. Court w/ Jury (*) |
Summary Dispositions | |
Avail. Disp. | Discharge (730) Suspended Sentence (731(1)(a)) |
Minimum | None |
Maximum | 18 months incarceration |
Indictable Dispositions | |
Avail. Disp. | Discharge (730) Suspended Sentence (731(1)(a)) |
Minimum | None |
Maximum | 10 years incarceration |
Reference | |
Offence Elements Sentence Digests |
Overview
The offences of assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm are found in Part VIII of the Criminal Code relating to "Offences Against the Person and Reputation".
- Pleadings
Offence Section |
Offence Type |
Crown Election | Defence Election s. 536(2) |
Preliminary Inquiry |
---|---|---|---|---|
s. 267(a) [assault with a weapon] and s. 267(b) [assault causing bodily harm] |
Hybrid Offence(s) | (* only if Crown proceeds by Indictment) | (under 14 years max) | |
s. 267(a) [assault with a weapon] and s. 267(b) [assault causing bodily harm] If related to IPV and with previous conviction for IPV (s. 718.3(8)) |
Hybrid Offence(s) | (* only if Crown proceeds by Indictment) | (14 years max) |
Offences under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] are hybrid with a Crown election. If prosecuted by indictment, there is a Defence election of Court under s. 536(2) to trial by provincial court, superior court judge-alone or superior court judge-and-jury. Offences under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] (assuming IPV offence with prior, see 718.3(8)) are hybrid with a Crown election. If prosecuted by indictment, there is a Defence election of Court under s. 536(2) to trial to trial in provincial court, superior court with a judge-alone (with or without a preliminary inquiry) or superior court with judge-and-jury (with or without a preliminary inquiry).
Before the Crown can rely on provisions increasing the duration of the weapons prohibition order due to a prior weapons prohibition order notice under s. 727 must be given prior to plea.
- Release
Offence(s) | Appearance Notice by Peace Officer s. 497 |
Summons by Judge or Justice s. 508(1), 512(1), or 788 |
Release by Peace Officer on Undertaking s. 498, 499, and 501 |
Release By a Judge or Justice on a Release Order s. 515 to 519 |
Direct to Attend for Fingerprints, etc. Identification of Criminals Act s. 2 ID Crim. Act |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] |
When charged under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] , the accused can be given an appearance notice without arrest under s. 497 or a summons. If arrested, he can be released by the arresting officer under s. 498 or 499 on an undertaking with or without conditions. He can also be released by a justice under s. 515.
- Reverse Onus Bail
If police decide to bring the accused before a Justice pursuant to s. 503, there will be a presumption against bail (i.e. a reverse onus) if the offence, prosecuted by indictment, was committed:
- while at large under s. 515 [bail release], 679 or 680 [release pending appeal or review of appeal] (s. 515(6)(a)(i));
- "for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association" with a criminal organization (s. 515(6)(a)(ii));
- where the offence involved a weapon, being a firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon restricted weapon, prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance, while the accused was subject to a prohibition order preventing possession of these items (s. 515(6)(a)(viii)); or
- where the accused is not "ordinarily a resident in Canada" (s. 515(6)(b)).
And, regardless of Crown election, if the offence alleged was one:
- where the offence was an allegation of violence against an "intimate partner" and the accused had been previously convicted of an offence of violence against an "intimate partner" (s. 515(6)(b.1));
- where the offence alleged is a breach under s. 145(2) to (5) while (s. 515(6)(c));
- where the offence committed (or conspired to commit) was an offence under s. 5 to 7 of the CDSA that is punishable by life imprisonment (s. 515(6)(d));
- Fingerprints and Photos
A peace officer who charges a person under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] of the Code can require that person to attend for the taking of fingerprints, photographs or other similar recordings that are used to identify them under the Identification of Criminals Act.
- Publication Bans
For all criminal or regulatory prosecutions, there is a discretionary general publication ban available on application of the Crown, victim or witness to prohibit the publishing of "any information that could identify the victim or witness" under s. 486.5(1) where it is "necessary" for the "proper administration of justice". Other available publication bans include prohibitions for publishing evidence or other information arising from a bail hearing (s. 517), preliminary inquiry (s. 539) or jury trial (s. 648). There is a mandatory publication ban in all youth prosecutions on information tending to identify young accused under s. 110 of the YCJA or young victims under s. 111 of the YCJA.
- Offence Designations
Offence(s) | Wiretap Eligible s. 183 |
Dangerous Offender Designated Offence s. 752 |
Serious Personal Injury Offence s. 752 |
AG Consent Required | Serious Criminality Offence s. 36 IRPA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] | (primary) |
Offences under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] are designated offences eligible for wiretap under s. 183.
Section s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] offences are "primary designated offences" under s. 752 for a Dangerous Offender Order. The offender will be deemed a "substantial risk" for a Long-Term Offender Order under s. 753.1.
Offences under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] are designated "serious personal injury" offences under s. 752(a) only if it has a maximum penalty of 10 years incarceration or more and involves "use or attempted use of violence against another person" or "conduct endangering or likely to endanger the life or safety of another person or inflicting or likely to inflict severe psychological damage on another person".
See below in Ancillary Sentencing Orders for details on designations relating to sentencing orders.
Offence Wording
- Assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm
267 Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who, in committing an assault,
- (a) carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation thereof,
- (b) causes bodily harm to the complainant, or
- (c) chokes, suffocates or strangles the complainant.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 267; 1994, c. 44, s. 17; 2019, c. 25, s. 93.
Draft Form of Charges
Pre-ambles | ||
---|---|---|
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, between the <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR> and <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR>***, at or near <COMMUNITY/TOWN/CITY>, <PROVINCE>, he [or she]..." OR | ||
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, on or about the <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR>, at or near <COMMUNITY/TOWN/CITY>, <PROVINCE>, he [or she]..." OR | ||
"AND FURTHER at the same time and place aforesaid, he [or she]..." | ||
Code Section | Subject of Offence | Draft Wording |
267(a) | assault with a weapon | "... did in committing an assault upon [name of alleged victim] [carry, use or threaten to use] a weapon or imitation weapon, to wit: [name of weapon] contrary to section 267(a) of the Criminal Code." |
267(b) | assault causing bodily harm | "... did in committing an assault upon [name of alleged victim] caused bodily harm to him contrary to section 267(b) of the Criminal Code." |
267(c)[1] | assault with a weapon | "... did in committing an assault upon [name of alleged victim] did [choke, suffocate or strangle] him contrary to section 267(c) of the Criminal Code." |
Proof of the Offence
Proving assault with a weapon under s. 267(a) should include:
|
Proving assault causing bodily harm under s. 267(b) should include:[2]
|
Interpretation of the Offence
Actus Reus
The actus reus of assault with a weapon matches that of the offence of common assault but adds the additional act of using or threatening to use a weapon.
- Threatens
The offence can be made out without applying any force or even intending to do so. A threat to assault with a weapon and the ability to do so is sufficient.[3]
- ↑ From September 19, 2019
- ↑
R v Swenson, 1994 CanLII 4683 (SK CA), [1994] 9 WWR 124, 123 Sask R 106 (CA)
- ↑
R v Horncastle, 1972 CanLII 1320 (NB CA), [1972] 8 CCC (2d) 253, per Limerick JA (“... It is not necessary to constitute the offence of assault that the accused actually apply force or even intend to do so. It is sufficient if he threatens to do so and has the present ability to do so. Mens rea lies in the intention to threaten not in the intention to carry out that threat.”)
R v Madsen, 1991 CanLII 7629 (SK QB), 14 WCB (2d) 68, per Batten J, at para 9
Mens Rea
An intention to throw an object without an intention to throw the object at someone, is not sufficient mens rea.[1] By contrast where there is objectively foreseeability of harm of the act, there may be liability.[2] Where the accused throws something carelessly it will usually not be sufficient intent for the mens rea. [3]
However, recklessness in the act is sufficient to convict.[4]
The doctrine of transferred intent allows the intent to assault one person to satisfy the mens rea for an assault against another person where that second person was not the target. The result is that the intention of a failed assault will transfer to the successful assault of another person. [5]
Intent to assault is made out by heating a lighter and applying it to a child's arm to teach him a lesson.[6]
- ↑ R v Vandergraaf, 1994 CanLII 16617 (MB CA), 93 CCC (3d) 286, per Philp JA -- a hockey fan at a game throws a jar of peanut butter onto the rink. The jar hits victim
- ↑ R v Nurse, 1993 CanLII 14691 (ON CA), 83 CCC (3d) 546, per Morden ACJ -- accused fires gun into the air and was convicted because it was objectively foreseeable that harm would be caused
- ↑
R v L(A), 2007 NUCJ 21 (CanLII), per Johnson J -- accused carelessly, in anger and while intoxicated, throws a beer bottle at a dashboard and bounces off hitting someone
R v Kemp, 1993 CanLII 8899 (SK QB), (1993) Carswell Sask. 116 (Sask. Q.B.), per Gunn J a hockey player, in frustration, shoots a puck into the bleachers hitting a person in the head - ↑ R v Mooney, (1997) Carswell Ont. 4433 (O.Ct.J.)(*no CanLII links) accused convicted for throwing a phone in the direction of accused, it bounces off a wall, hitting the victim in the head
- ↑
R v Delaney, (1989) Y.J. No 182 (Y.T. Ct.)(*no CanLII links)
, at para 37
See also: R v Deakin, 1974 CanLII 1464 (MB CA), 16 CCC (2d) 1 (Man. Ct. of App.), per Matas JA
R v Phan, 2009 ABPC 190 (CanLII), 476 AR 323 (ABPC), per Cummings J - ↑ R v Earl, 2006 NSSC 52 (CanLII), 763 APR 197, per Coughlan J
Intent
Assault causing bodily harm is a general intent offence.[1]
The accused does not need to intend the consequences of his actions. Where he is reckless whether the act caused bodily harm will be sufficient.[2]
The mens rea requires that there be an "objective foreseeability of risk of bodily harm" in general. There is no need for establishing the risk of the specific type of harm that occurs.[3]
Sufficient intent is made out where the accused was engaged in a course of conduct that was objectively dangerous and bodily harm results.[4]
An intention to intimidate or frighten is not sufficient to establish an intention to cause serious bodily harm.[5]
- ↑
R v MKK, 2012 SKQB 531 (CanLII), per Acton J, at para 5
R v Janvier, 1979 ALTASCAD 27 (CanLII), 11 CR (3d) 399, [1979] AJ No 251, per Sinclair JA - ↑
See R v AE, 2000 CanLII 16823 (ON CA), 146 CCC (3d) 449, 35 CR (5th) 386, per Weiler JA
- ↑
See R v Dewey, 1999 ABCA 5 (CanLII), 132 CCC (3d) 348, per McClung JA
- ↑
See R v DeSousa, 1992 CanLII 80, [1992] 2 SCR 944, per Sopkina J
R v Van De Wiel, 1997 CanLII 9923 (NS SC), 158 NSR (2d) 368, per Scanlan J, at para 20
- ↑
See also, R v CD; R v CDK, 2005 SCC 78 (CanLII), [2005] 3 SCR 668, per Bastarache J
R v Moquin, 2010 MBCA 22 (CanLII), 253 CCC (3d) 96, per Beard JA, at paras 22 to 28
Causing
For an accused to be found to have caused injury from violence the court must be satisfied that the act was a "contributing cause...outside the de minimis range."[1] This has also been stated by concluding that the action must be a "contributing" cause and not just a "minimal" or "insignificant" cause.[2]
There is variation between jurisdictions on whether the crown must prove intention to cause harm. There is a line of cases that conclude that the Crown must prove that the harm was an "objectively foreseeable consequence of the assault."[3] There is also a line of cases that conclude that merely the intent to apply force is sufficient.[4]
The shooting of a gun into the air creates an objective foreseeability that a person will be hit by the falling bullets and suffer bodily harm.[5]
- ↑ Smithers v R, 1977 CanLII 7 (SCC), [1978] 1 SCR 506, per Dickson J, at p. 89
- ↑ R v Pinske (1988), 30 B.C.L.R. (2d) 114(*no CanLII links) aff'd 1989 CanLII 47 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 979, per Lamer J
- ↑
R v Palombi, 2007 ONCA 486 (CanLII), 222 CCC (3d) 528, per Rosenberg JA
R v Dewey, 1999 ABCA 5 (CanLII), 132 CCC (3d) 348, per McClung JA
R v Nurse, 1993 CanLII 14691 (ON CA), 83 CCC (3d) 546, per Morden ACJ
See also: R v Cador, 2010 ABCA 232 (CanLII), 487 AR 93, per curiam - ↑
R v Swenson, 1994 CanLII 4683 (SK CA), 91 CCC (3d) 541, per Vancise JA
R v Brooks, 1988 CanLII 3018 (BC CA), 41 CCC (3d) 157, per Macdonald JA
- ↑ R v Nurse, 1993 CanLII 14691 (ON CA), 83 CCC (3d) 546, per Morden ACJ
Consent
One cannot consent to being stabbed.[1]
- ↑ R v Carriere, 1987 ABCA 39 (CanLII), 35 CCC (3d) 276, per Laycraft CJ, at p. 287: ("One cannot consent to be stabbed. The public policy of the law intervenes to nullify the apparent consent of each of the combatants.")
Cross-Referenced Terms
Section 2 defines weapons, and bodily harm. The section on weapons will also address the "use" of weapons.
Kienapple
Many cases state that an accused cannot be convicted of Assault with a Weapon and Assault Causing Bodily Harm where they arise out of the same circumstances.[1] The same goes for the offence of assault with a weapon and aggravated assault.[2]
Where the evidence is substantially the same for proving the elements of possession for a dangerous purpose and assault with a weapon, convictions on both are precluded.[3]
A conviction can be entered on both aggravated assault and assault with a weapon.[4]
Kienapple does not apply to assault causing bodily harm and unlawful confinement, as "bodily harm" is an essential element to Assault CBH.[5]
Many cases state that an accused cannot be convicted of assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm where they arise out of the same circumstances.[6]
- ↑
e.g. R v Arnill, 1999 CanLII 3188 (ON CA), [1999] OJ No 332 (CA), per curiam
R v Basilio, 2003 CanLII 15531 (ON CA), 175 CCC (3d) 440, per Gillese JA
R v Briscoe, 1992 CanLII 938 (BC CA), 76 CCC (3d) 563, per Wood JA
- ↑ Basilio, supra
- ↑ Briscoe, supra
- ↑ R v Foster, 2008 BCSC 1368 (CanLII), per Ehrcke J
- ↑ R v Bannert, 2009 ABCA 15 (CanLII), 242 CCC (3d) 279, per curiam
- ↑
e.g. Arnill, supra
Basilio, supra
Briscoe, supra
Considered Defences
- Consensual fight
- Self-Defence
- Defence of Another
- Defence of Property
- Accident and Mistake
- De Minimus
- Reflex
The statutory defence of duress is excluded by s. 17 from applying to offences of assault causing bodily harm or with a weapon.
Participation of Third Parties
- Testimonial Aids
Certain persons who testify are entitled to make application for the use of testimonial aids: Exclusion of Public (s. 486), Use of a Testimonial Screen (s. 486), Access to Support Person While Testifying (s. 486.1), Close Proximity Video-link Testimony (s. 486.2), Self-Represented Cross-Examination Prohibition Order (s. 486.3), and Witness Security Order (s. 486.7).
A witness, victim or complainant may also request publication bans (s. 486.4, 486.5) and/or a Witness Identity Non-disclosure Order (s. 486.31). See also, Publication Bans, above.
- On Finding of Guilt
Offence(s) | Victim Notice of Agreement s. 606(4.1) [SPIO] |
Victim Queried for Interest in Agreement s. 606(4.2) [5+ years] |
Victim Notice for Restitution s. 737.1 |
Victim Notice of Impact Statement s. 722(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] |
For serious personal injury offences or murder, s. 606(4.1) requires that after accepting a guilty plea, the judge must inquire whether "any of the victims had advised the prosecutor of their desire to be informed if such an agreement were entered into, and, if so, whether reasonable steps were taken to inform that victim of the agreement". Failing to take reasonable steps at guilty plea requires the prosecutor to "as soon as feasible, take reasonable steps to inform the victim of the agreement and the acceptance of the plea" (s. 606(4.3)).
Under s. 738, a judge must inquire from the Crown before sentencing whether "reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victims with an opportunity to indicate whether they are seeking restitution for their losses and damages".
Under s. 722(2), the judge must inquire "[a]s soon as feasible" before sentencing with the Crown "if reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victim with an opportunity to prepare" a victim impact statement. This will include any person "who has suffered, or is alleged to have suffered, physical or emotional harm, property damage or economic loss" as a result of the offence. Individuals representing a community impacted by the crime may file a statement under s. 722.2.
Sentencing Principles and Ranges
- For general principles and factors of violence and assault-based offences, see Violent and Assaultive Offences
- Maximum Penalties
Offence(s) | Crown Election |
Maximum Penalty |
---|---|---|
s. 267(a) [assault with a weapon] or s. 267(b) [assault causing bodily harm] |
summary election | 18 months incarceration |
s. 267(a) [assault with a weapon] or s. 267(b) [assault causing bodily harm] |
indictable election | 10 years incarceration |
s. 267(a) [assault with a weapon] or s. 267(b) [assault causing bodily harm] If related to IPV and with previous conviction for IPV (s. 718.3(8))[1] |
indictable election | 14 years incarceration |
Offences under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] are hybrid. If prosecuted by indictment, the maximum penalty is 10 years incarceration. If prosecuted by summary conviction, the maximum penalty is 18 months incarceration. Where the offender is convicted for a second-time for intimate partner violence (IPV) and the election is to proceed by indictment, then the maximum penalty is 14 years incarceration.
- Minimum Penalties
These offences have no mandatory minimum penalties.
- Available Dispositions
Offence(s) | Crown Election |
Discharge s. 730 |
Suspended Sentence s. 731(1)(a) |
Stand-alone Fine s. 731(1)(b) |
Custody s. 718.3, 787 |
Custody and Probation s. 731(1)(b) |
Custody and Fine s. 734 |
Conditional Sentence (CSO) s. 742.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] | any |
Offences under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] are ineligible for a conditional sentence order under s. 742.1(c), when prosecuted by indictment, as the maximum period of incarceration is 14 years or life.
- Consecutive Sentences
There are no statutory requirements that the sentences be consecutive.
Principles
Where assault offences involve weapons of any type "denunciation and deterrence are paramount factors in sentencing."[2]
- ↑ From September 19, 2019
- ↑
R v Hamlyn, 2016 ABCA 127 (CanLII), per curiam, at para 21
R v Gorman, 2008 ABCA 311 (CanLII), 79 WCB (2d) 460, per Slatter JA, at para 8
R v Ruksys, 2006 ABCA 270 (CanLII), 401 AR 82, per Martin JA, at paras 7 to 8
Ranges
- see also: Common Assault (Sentencing Cases)
Where there is an assault using a weapon that is capable of causing "serious injury" and those injuries result, a period of incarceration is "virtually inevitable."[1]
Ancillary Sentencing Orders
- Offence-specific Orders
Order | Conviction | Description |
---|---|---|
DNA Orders | s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] |
|
Weapons Prohibition Orders | s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] |
|
Delayed Parole Order | s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] |
|
- General Sentencing Orders
Order | Conviction | Description |
---|---|---|
Non-communication order while offender in custody (s. 743.21) | any | The judge has the discretion to order that the offender be prohibited "from communicating...with any victim, witness or other person" while in custody except where the judge "considers [it] necessary" to communicate with them. |
Restitution Orders (s. 738) | any | A discretionary Order is available for things such as the replacement value of the property; the pecuniary damages incurred from harm, expenses fleeing a domestic partner; or certain expenses arising from the commission of an offence under s.402.2 or 403. |
Victim Fine Surcharge (s. 737) | any | A discretionary surcharge under s. 737 of 30% of any fine order imposed, $100 per summary conviction or $200 per indictable conviction. If the offence occurs on or after October 23, 2013, the order has smaller minimum amounts (15%, $50, or $100). |
- General Forfeiture Orders
Forfeiture | Conviction | Description |
---|---|---|
Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime (s. 462.37(1) or (2.01)) | any | Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence under the Code or the CDSA in which property is "proceeds of crime" and offence was "committed in relation to that property", the property shall be forfeited to His Majesty the King on application of the Crown. NB: does not apply to summary offences. |
Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture (s. 462.37(3)) | any | Where a Court is satisfied an order for the forfeiture of proceeds of crime under s. 462.37(1) or (2.01) can be made, but that property cannot be "made subject to an order", then the Court "may" order a fine in "an amount equal to the value of the property". Failure to pay the fine will result in a default judgement imposing a period of incarceration. |
Forfeiture of Weapons or Firearms (s. 491) | any | Where there is finding of guilt for an offence where a "weapon, an imitation firearm, a prohibited device, any ammunition, any prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance was used in the commission of [the] offence and that thing has been seized and detained", or "that a person has committed an offence that involves, or the subject-matter of which is, a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance has been seized and detained, that the item be an enumerated weapon or related item be connected to the offence", then there will be a mandatory forfeiture order. However, under s. 491(2), if the lawful owner "was not a party to the offence" and the judge has "no reasonable grounds to believe that the thing would or might be used in the commission of an offence", then it should be returned to the lawful owner. |
Forfeiture of Offence-related Property (s. 490.1) | any | Where there is a finding of guilt for an indictable offence, "any property is offence-related property" where (a) by means or in respect of which an indictable offence under this Act or the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act is committed, (b) that is used in any manner in connection with the commission of such an offence, or (c) that is intended to be used for committing such an offence". Such property is to be forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province. NB: does not apply to summary offences. |
Record Suspensions and Pardons
Convictions under s. 267 [assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm] are eligible for record suspensions pursuant to s. 3 and 4 of the Criminal Records Act after 5 years after the expiration of sentence for summary conviction offences and 10 years after the expiration of sentence for all other offences. The offender may not have the record suspended where the offender was (1) convicted of 3 or more offences with a maximum penalty of life, and (2) for each 3 offences he "was sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more".
History
See Also
- Related Offences
- Motions
|
- ↑
R v Ruksys, 2006 ABCA 270 (CanLII), 401 AR 82, per Martin JA, at para 8 (“People must understand that when a weapon capable of causing serious injury is used in an assault and serious injuries do result, incarceration is virtually inevitable.”
R. v. Bazinet, 2005 CarswellAlta 1634, 2005 ABCA 388(complete citation pending)
R v Sykes, 2010 ABCA 24 (CanLII), per Rowbotham JA, at para 8
- 2020
- Level Zero
- Criminal Law
- Sentencing
- Offences
- Wiretap Eligible Offences
- Serious Personal Injury Offences
- 1985, c. C-46
- 1994, c. 44
- 2019, c. 25
- Notice of Settlement to Victim
- Offences Requiring Notice to Victim
- Offences with Maximum Penalty of 18 Months
- Offences with Maximum Penalty of 10 Years
- Offences with Maximum Penalty of 14 Years
- Hybrid Offences
- Offences with No Mandatory Minimum
- Primary Designated Offences for DNA Orders
- Section 109 or 110 Prohibition Offences
- Delayed Parole
- Violence Offences
- Cleanup