Murder (Offence): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
m Text replacement - "\)\|, ([0-9]+) CCC" to ")|$1 CCC"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Text replacement - "{{Currency\|([A-Za-z]+) ([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])}}" to "{{Currency2|$1|$2}}"
 
(29 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Currency2|January|2020}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderHomicide}}
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderHomicide}}


Line 29: Line 30:


; Release
; Release
Where an accused is charged with any offence listed in s. 469 [including 235], he will be remanded under s. 515(11). The accused may only be released by a [[Judicial Interim Release|superior court judge under s. 522]].
Where an accused is charged with any offence listed in s. 469 [including 235], he will be remanded under s. 515(11). The accused may only be released by a [[Release_on_Section_469_Offences|superior court judge under s. 522]].


; Publication Bans
; Publication Bans
Line 56: Line 57:
==Offence Wording==
==Offence Wording==


{{quotation2|
{{quotation3|
; Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide
; Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide
; Murder
; Murder
Line 69: Line 70:
{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 77.
{{LegHistory10s|2019, c. 25}}, s. 77.
{{Annotation}}
{{Annotation}}
|[{{CCCSec|229}} CCC]
|{{CCCSec2|229}}
|{{NoteUp|229}}
|{{NoteUp|229}}
|{{Terms-
| "[[Homicide (Offence)|homicide]]" (s. 222)
}}
}}
}}


{{quotation2|
{{quotation2|
; Classification of murder
; Classification of murder
231 (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.
231 (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.<br>
<br>
 
; Planned and deliberate murder
; Planned and deliberate murder
(2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.
(2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.<br>
<br>
{{removed|(3), (4), (5), (6), (6.01), (6.1) and (6.2)}}
...
 
<br>
; Second degree murder
; Second degree murder
(7) All murder that is not first degree murder is second degree murder.
(7) All murder that is not first degree murder is second degree murder.
<br>
<br>
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 231; R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.)}}, ss. 7, 35, 40, 185(F), c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); {{LegHistory90s|1997, c. 16}}, s. 3, c. 23, s. 8; {{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 32}}, s. 9, c. 41, s. 9; {{LegHistory00s|2009, c. 22}}, s. 5.
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 231;  
|[{{CCCSec|231}} CCC]
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.)}}, ss. 7, 35, 40, 185(F), c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F);  
{{LegHistory90s|1997, c. 16}}, s. 3, c. 23, s. 8;  
{{LegHistory00s|2001, c. 32}}, s. 9, c. 41, s. 9;  
{{LegHistory00s|2009, c. 22}}, s. 5.
|{{CCCSec2|231}}
|{{NoteUp|231|1|27}}
|{{NoteUp|231|1|27}}
}}
}}
Line 98: Line 105:
<br>
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 218; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 3; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 5.  
R.S., c. C-34, s. 218; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 3; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 5.  
|[{{CCCSec|235}} CCC]
|{{CCCSec2|235}}
|{{NoteUp|235|1|2}}
|{{NoteUp|235|1|2}}
}}
}}
Line 109: Line 116:
:(b) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of culpable homicide that is murder, however described in this Act, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
:(b) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of culpable homicide that is murder, however described in this Act, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
:(b.1) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of an offence under section 4 or 6 of the ''Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act'' that had as its basis an intentional killing, whether or not it was planned and deliberate, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
:(b.1) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of an offence under section 4 or 6 of the ''Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act'' that had as its basis an intentional killing, whether or not it was planned and deliberate, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
:(c) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder, that the person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served at least ten years of the sentence or such greater number of years, not being more than twenty-five years, as has been substituted therefor pursuant to section 745.4; and<br>
:(c) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder, that the person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served at least ten years of the sentence or such greater number of years, not being more than twenty-five years, as has been substituted therefor pursuant to section 745.4; and
 
:{{removed|(d)}}
...<br>
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 745;  
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 745;  
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.)}}, s. 10;
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.)}}, s. 10;
Line 117: Line 123:
{{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 51}}, s. 39;  
{{LegHistory90s|1992, c. 51}}, s. 39;  
{{LegHistory90s|1995, c. 22}}, s. 6; {{LegHistory00s|2000, c. 24}}, s. 46.
{{LegHistory90s|1995, c. 22}}, s. 6; {{LegHistory00s|2000, c. 24}}, s. 46.
|[{{CCCSec|745}} CCC]
|{{CCCSec2|745}}
|{{NoteUp|745}}
|{{NoteUp|745}}
}}
}}
Line 123: Line 129:
===Draft Form of Charges===
===Draft Form of Charges===
{{seealso|Draft Form of Charges}}
{{seealso|Draft Form of Charges}}
{{DraftHeader}}
{{DraftHeader}}
|-
|-
|  
| 235
|  
| first degree murder
|"{{ellipsis1}}, contrary to section XXX of the ''Criminal Code''.
|"{{ellipsis1}}, did cause the death of [person] and thereby commit murder in the first degree{{ToWit-Conduct}} {{contrary|235}}.
|-
| 235
| second degree murder
|"{{ellipsis1}}, did cause the death of [person] and thereby commit murder in the second degree{{ToWit-Conduct}} {{contrary|235}}.
{{DraftEnd}}
{{DraftEnd}}


Line 141: Line 150:
## {{box}} an intent to cause death ''or''  
## {{box}} an intent to cause death ''or''  
## {{box}} an intent to cause bodily harm that the accused knew was likely to cause death and was reckless as to whether death ensues or not.<ref>
## {{box}} an intent to cause bodily harm that the accused knew was likely to cause death and was reckless as to whether death ensues or not.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Paskimin|fqs4z|2012 SKCA 35 (CanLII)}}{{perSKCA|Herauf JA}}{{atL|fqs4z|33}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Paskimin|fqs4z|2012 SKCA 35 (CanLII)|393 Sask R 30}}{{perSKCA|Herauf JA}}{{atL|fqs4z|33}}</ref>


{{ElementRight}}
{{ElementRight}}
Line 155: Line 164:
{{ElementLeft}}
{{ElementLeft}}


{{Proving|unlawful act murder|229(c)}}<ref>see {{CanLIIR|Roks|fn7h4|2011 ONCA 618 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Watt JA}}</ref>
{{Proving|unlawful act murder|229(c)}}<ref>see {{CanLIIRP|Roks|fn7h4|2011 ONCA 618 (CanLII)|284 CCC (3d) 510}}{{perONCA-H|Watt JA}}</ref>
{{InitialElements}}
{{InitialElements}}
# {{box}} the culprit does a dangerous act  
# {{box}} the culprit does a dangerous act  
Line 169: Line 178:


Section 582 requires the indictment specially indications the charge of first degree murder before there can be a conviction for first degree murder.
Section 582 requires the indictment specially indications the charge of first degree murder before there can be a conviction for first degree murder.
[[File:murder1tree.png|400px|thumb]]
[[File:murder2tree.png|400px|thumb]]
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}


Line 174: Line 186:
{{seealso|Offences Found to be Unconstitutional#Constructive Murder}}
{{seealso|Offences Found to be Unconstitutional#Constructive Murder}}
The portion of s. 229(c) that states "ought to know" is unconstitutional and is of no force or effect to the provision.<ref>
The portion of s. 229(c) that states "ought to know" is unconstitutional and is of no force or effect to the provision.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Martineau|1fssd|1990 CanLII 80 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}} -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Martineau|1fssd|1990 CanLII 80 (SCC)|[1990] 2 SCR 633}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}} -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional<br>
{{CanLIIR|Sit|1fsj3|1991 CanLII 34 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Sit|1fsj3|1991 CanLII 34 (SCC)|[1991] 3 SCR 124}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}</ref>


Section 230 was found unconstitutional because first degree murder cannot be less than objective foresight of death.<ref>
Section 230 was found unconstitutional because first degree murder cannot be less than objective foresight of death.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Vaillancourt|1fthw|1987 CanLII 2 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Vaillancourt|1fthw|1987 CanLII 2 (SCC)|[1987] 2 SCR 636}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}<br>
{{supra1|Martineau}} -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional</ref>
{{supra1|Martineau}} -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional</ref>


Line 185: Line 197:
==Murder==
==Murder==
First degree and second degree murder are not separate offences. Section 231, defining first degree murder, is "purely a classification section and does not create a separate substantive offence." The distinction is only for the purpose of sentencing.<ref>
First degree and second degree murder are not separate offences. Section 231, defining first degree murder, is "purely a classification section and does not create a separate substantive offence." The distinction is only for the purpose of sentencing.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Nygaard|1ft11|1989 CanLII 6 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}{{atL|1ft11|17}}</ref>  
{{CanLIIRP|Nygaard|1ft11|1989 CanLII 6 (SCC)|[1989] 2 SCR 1074}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}{{atL|1ft11|17}}</ref>  
First degree murder is an "aggravated form of murder and not a distinct substantive offence".<ref>
First degree murder is an "aggravated form of murder and not a distinct substantive offence."<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Harbottle|1fs0z|1993 CanLII 71 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Cory J}} at 323<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Harbottle|1fs0z|1993 CanLII 71 (SCC)|[1993] 3 SCR 306}}{{perSCC|Cory J}} at 323<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Line 206: Line 218:


The necessary intent for murder requires proving a subjective foresight of death.<ref>
The necessary intent for murder requires proving a subjective foresight of death.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Vaillancourt|1fthw|1987 CanLII 2 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Vaillancourt|1fthw|1987 CanLII 2 (SCC)|[1987] 2 SCR 636}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}</ref>


The requisite intent does not need to be simultaneous to the act that causes death. The two must coincide with the "transaction" that forms the substance of the killing. The intent does not need to be present throughout the acts or series of actions or events.
The requisite intent does not need to be simultaneous to the act that causes death. The two must coincide with the "transaction" that forms the substance of the killing. The intent does not need to be present throughout the acts or series of actions or events.
<ref>
<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Cooper|1fs5v|1993 CanLII 147 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}
{{CanLIIRP|Cooper|1fs5v|1993 CanLII 147 (SCC)|[1993] 1 SCR 146}}{{perSCC|Cory J}}
</ref>
</ref>


An accused may still be convicted if he does not know the victim's identity<ref>
An accused may still be convicted if he does not know the victim's identity<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Marshall|g9l3d|1986 CanLII 4617 (NSCA)| (1986) 25 CCC (3d) 151 (NSCA)}}{{perNSCA|Clarke JA}}</ref> or is mistaken as to the victim's identity.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Marshall|g9l3d|1986 CanLII 4617 (NSCA)|25 CCC (3d) 151}}{{perNSCA|Clarke JA}}</ref> or is mistaken as to the victim's identity.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Prevost|g9b1k|1988 CanLII 7058 (ON CA)| (1988), 42 CCC (3d) 314 (ONCA)}}{{perONCA|Zuber JA}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Prevost|g9b1k|1988 CanLII 7058 (ON CA)|42 CCC (3d) 314}}{{perONCA|Zuber JA}}</ref>


; Foreseeable Death (s. 229(a)(ii))
; Foreseeable Death (s. 229(a)(ii))
The Crown must prove that the accused had actual subjective forsight of the victim's death as a "probable consequence" of the assault.<ref>
The Crown must prove that the accused had actual subjective forsight of the victim's death as a "probable consequence" of the assault.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Rodgerson|g6sg6|2014 ONCA 366 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}}{{atL|g6sg6|24}} ("The impugned instruction was given in the course of the trial judge’s description of the elements of self-defence, although a similar brief passage also appears in his instructions on intoxication.  However, in the part of the instruction dealing specifically with the state of mind required for murder, the trial judge on at least three occasions correctly set out the foreseeability requirement in s. 229(a)(ii), telling the jury that the Crown had to prove that the appellant foresaw Ms. Young’s death as the probable consequence of his assault on her.")<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Rodgerson|g6sg6|2014 ONCA 366 (CanLII)|309 CCC (3d) 535}}{{perONCA-H|Doherty JA}}{{atL|g6sg6|24}} ("The impugned instruction was given in the course of the trial judge’s description of the elements of self-defence, although a similar brief passage also appears in his instructions on intoxication.  However, in the part of the instruction dealing specifically with the state of mind required for murder, the trial judge on at least three occasions correctly set out the foreseeability requirement in s. 229(a)(ii), telling the jury that the Crown had to prove that the appellant foresaw Ms. Young’s death as the probable consequence of his assault on her.")<br>
{{supra1|Vaillantcourt}}{{atL|1fthw|11}} ("Here again the accused must have actual subjective foresight of the likelihood of death. However, the Crown need no longer prove that he intended to cause the death but only that he was reckless whether death ensued or not. It should also be noted that s. 212(a)(ii) is limited to cases where the accused intended to cause bodily harm to the victim.")
{{supra1|Vaillantcourt}}{{atL|1fthw|11}} ("Here again the accused must have actual subjective foresight of the likelihood of death. However, the Crown need no longer prove that he intended to cause the death but only that he was reckless whether death ensued or not. It should also be noted that s. 212(a)(ii) is limited to cases where the accused intended to cause bodily harm to the victim.")
</ref>
</ref>


The phrase "is reckless whether death ensues or not" has been characterized as "largely redundant".<ref>
The phrase "is reckless whether death ensues or not" has been characterized as "largely redundant."<ref>
{{ibid1|Rodgerson}}{{atL|g6sg6|23}}<br>
{{ibid1|Rodgerson}}{{atL|g6sg6|23}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>
; Section 229(b)
Section 229(b) has the same requirements as s. 229(a) except that it applies where the conduct and intent was directed at a third party and the victim was killed by accident or mistake. This effectively creates a form of transferred intent for murder.


{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
Line 232: Line 247:
* [[Planned and Deliberate]]
* [[Planned and Deliberate]]


===Murder by Unlawful Act or Object (s. 231(3) to (6))===
===Murder by Unlawful Act or Object (s. 229(c) and 231(3) to (6))===
* [[Murder by Unlawful Act or Object]]
* [[Murder by Unlawful Act or Object]]


Line 238: Line 253:
{{seealso|Lesser Included Offences}}
{{seealso|Lesser Included Offences}}
{{quotation2|
{{quotation2|
662.<br>...<br>
662<br>
{{removed|(1)}}
; First degree murder charged
; First degree murder charged
(2) For greater certainty and without limiting the generality of subsection (1) {{AnnSec6|662(1)}}, where a count charges first degree murder and the evidence does not prove first degree murder but proves second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of first degree murder but guilty of second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, as the case may be.
(2) For greater certainty and without limiting the generality of subsection (1) {{AnnSec6|662(1)}}, where a count charges first degree murder and the evidence does not prove first degree murder but proves second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of first degree murder but guilty of second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, as the case may be.
<br>
<br>
; Conviction for infanticide or manslaughter on charge of murder
; Conviction for infanticide or manslaughter on charge of murder
(3) Subject to subsection (4) {{AnnSec6|662(4)}}, where a count charges murder and the evidence proves manslaughter or infanticide but does not prove murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter or infanticide, but shall not on that count find the accused guilty of any other offence.
(3) Subject to subsection (4) {{AnnSec6|662(4)}}, where a count charges murder and the evidence proves manslaughter or infanticide but does not prove murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter or infanticide, but shall not on that count find the accused guilty of any other offence.<br>
<br>...<br>
{{removed|(4), (5) and (6)}}
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 662;
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 662;
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.)}}, s. 134;
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.)}}, s. 134;
Line 251: Line 267:
{{LegHistory10s|2018, c. 21}}, s. 20.
{{LegHistory10s|2018, c. 21}}, s. 20.
{{Annotation}}
{{Annotation}}
|[{{CCCSec|662}} CCC]
|{{CCCSec2|662}}
|{{NoteUp|662|2|3}}
|{{NoteUp|662|2|3}}
}}
}}


Where the Crown proves an intent to kill but fails to prove causation, the lesser included offence of attempted murder is available.<ref>
Where the Crown proves an intent to kill but fails to prove causation, the lesser included offence of attempted murder is available.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Sarrazin|2chrm|2010 ONCA 577 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}}
{{CanLIIRP|Sarrazin|2chrm|2010 ONCA 577 (CanLII)|259 CCC (3d) 293}}{{perONCA-H|Doherty JA}}
</ref>
</ref>


Line 264: Line 280:
{{quotation2|
{{quotation2|
; Circumstances of aggravation
; Circumstances of aggravation
610 (1) ...<br>
610<br>
{{removed|(1)}}
; Effect of previous charge of murder or manslaughter
; Effect of previous charge of murder or manslaughter
(2) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as manslaughter or infanticide, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for manslaughter or infanticide bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as murder.
(2) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as manslaughter or infanticide, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for manslaughter or infanticide bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as murder.
Line 271: Line 288:
(3) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for first degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as second degree murder, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for second degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as first degree murder.
(3) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for first degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as second degree murder, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for second degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as first degree murder.
<br>
<br>
; Effect of previous charge of infanticide or manslaughter
{{removed|(4)}}
(4)...<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 538; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 5; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 9.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 538; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 5; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 9.
|[{{CCCSec|610}} CCC]
|{{CCCSec2|610}}
|{{NoteUp|610|2|3}}
|{{NoteUp|610|2|3}}
}}
}}
Line 283: Line 299:
==Proof of Death==
==Proof of Death==
Death occurs once the vital functions and organs irreversibly cease to operate.<ref>
Death occurs once the vital functions and organs irreversibly cease to operate.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Green|22kn8|1988 CanLII 3274 (BC SC)| (1988), 43 CCC (3d) 413}}{{perBCSC|Wood J}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Green|22kn8|1988 CanLII 3274 (BC SC)|43 CCC (3d) 413}}{{perBCSC|Wood J}}</ref>


The Crown must prove as an essential element that the victim is dead. In most cases this is a trivial fact. It is only in murder cases with a missing body that there may be an issue in proving the element.<ref>
The Crown must prove as an essential element that the victim is dead. In most cases this is a trivial fact. It is only in murder cases with a missing body that there may be an issue in proving the element.<ref>
e.g. {{CanLIIR|Pritchard|1qg48|2007 BCCA 82 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Hall JA}}, aff'd  at SCC in 236 CCC (3d) 301, [http://canlii.ca/t/21b1w 2008 SCC 59] (CanLII), [2008] 3 SCR 195{{perSCC|Binnie J}} -- conviction for first degree with no evidence of body or how the victim died<br>
e.g. {{CanLIIRP|Pritchard|1qg48|2007 BCCA 82 (CanLII)|217 CCC (3d) 1}}{{perBCCA|Hall JA}}, aff'd  at SCC in 236 CCC (3d) 301, [http://canlii.ca/t/21b1w 2008 SCC 59] (CanLII), [2008] 3 SCR 195{{perSCC-H|Binnie J}} -- conviction for first degree with no evidence of body or how the victim died<br>
{{CanLIIR|St-Germain|2dvfk|2009 QCCA 1474 (CanLII)}}{{perQCCA|Dufresne JA}}</ref>
{{CanLIIRx|St-Germain|2dvfk|2009 QCCA 1474 (CanLII)}}{{perQCCA|Dufresne JA}}</ref>


There is no rule requiring that body be found in order to prove a homicide.<ref>
There is no rule requiring that body be found in order to prove a homicide.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|CMM|frc6z|2012 MBQB 141 (CanLII)}}{{perMBQB|Joyal CJ}} ("For example, the absence of a body in a murder prosecution will not preclude a conviction where the other direct and/or circumstantial evidence establishes that an unlawful death has occurred involving an identifiable victim. ")
{{CanLIIRP|CMM|frc6z|2012 MBQB 141 (CanLII)|93 CR (6th) 155}}{{perMBQB|Joyal CJ}} ("For example, the absence of a body in a murder prosecution will not preclude a conviction where the other direct and/or circumstantial evidence establishes that an unlawful death has occurred involving an identifiable victim. ")
</ref>
</ref>


Line 300: Line 316:
582 No person shall be convicted for the offence of high treason or first degree murder unless in the indictment charging the offence he is specifically charged with that offence.
582 No person shall be convicted for the offence of high treason or first degree murder unless in the indictment charging the offence he is specifically charged with that offence.
<br>
<br>
R.S., c. C-34, s. 511; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 4; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 6.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 511;  
|[{{CCCSec|582}} CCC]
1973-74, c. 38, s. 4;  
1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 6.
|{{CCCSec2|582}}
|{{NoteUp|582}}
|{{NoteUp|582}}
}}
}}
Line 312: Line 330:
:(b) the accused signifies consent to the joinder of the counts.
:(b) the accused signifies consent to the joinder of the counts.
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 589; 1991, c. 4, s. 2.
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. C-46}}, s. 589; 1991, c. 4, s. 2.
|[{{CCCSec|589}} CCC]
|{{CCCSec2|589}}
|{{NoteUp|589}}
|{{NoteUp|589}}
}}
}}
Line 320: Line 338:


The argument of excessive use of force in self-defence does not reduce murder to manslaughter.<ref>
The argument of excessive use of force in self-defence does not reduce murder to manslaughter.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Reilly|1txk7|1984 CanLII 83 (SCC)|[1984] 2 SCR 396 (CanLII)}}{{perSCC|Ritchie J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRP|Reilly|1txk7|1984 CanLII 83 (SCC)|[1984] 2 SCR 396}}{{perSCC|Ritchie J}}<br>
see also [[Self-Defence and Defence of Another]]
see also [[Self-Defence and Defence of Another]]
</ref>
</ref>
Line 341: Line 359:


==Sentencing Principles and Ranges==
==Sentencing Principles and Ranges==
{{seealsoSentencing}}
; Maximum Penalties
{{SProfileMaxHeader}}
{{SProfileMax|s. 235 | {{NA}} | {{MaxLife}} }}
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{MaxPenaltyIndictment|s. 235 |'''{{MaxLife}}'''}}
; Minimum Penalties
{{MinPenalty|s. 235|'''{{MinLife}}''' {{DescrSec|235}}}}
; Available Dispositions
{{SProfileAvailHeader}}
|s. 235 || any || {{SProfileOnlyFedJail}}
|-
{{SProfileEnd}}
{{OnlyJailAvailable|s. 235}}
; Consecutive Sentences
{{NoConsecutive}}
===Principles===
Any murder is considered brutal and vicious.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Paterson|1fnbx|2001 BCCA 11 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Hall JA}} (2:1) {{atL|1fnbx|30}}
</ref>
; Second Degree Murder
The penalty is a mandatory life sentence with a parole ineligibility period of between 10 and 25 years.
Sentencing for second degree murder is governed by s. 745(c), 745.2, and 745.4 in addition to the regular sentencing provisions.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Ledesma|hzbr4|2019 ABQB 204 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|Gates J}}{{atsL|hzbr4|24| to 34}}
</ref>
The process for parole ineligibility for second-degree murder is a "very fact-sensitive process" that accounts for:<Ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Shropshire|1frgh|1995 CanLII 47 (SCC)|[1995] 4 SCR 227 (CanLII)}}{{perSCC|Iacobucci J}}<br>
{{supra1|Ledesma}}{{AtL|hzbr4|31}}<br>
</ref>
# the character of the offender
# the nature of the offence
# the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence.
The purpose of s. 744 is to "give the trial judge an element of discretion in sentencing to reflect the fact that within second degree murder there is both a range of seriousness and varying degrees of moral culpability"<ref>
{{supra1|Shropshire}}{{AtL|1frgh|33}}
</ref>
The variable degrees of ineligibility is meant to reflect the "varying degrees of moral culpability".<Ref>
{{supra1|Shropshire}}{{atL|1frgh|31}} ("Parliament intended to recognize that, within the category of second-degree murder, there will be a broad range of seriousness reflecting varying degrees of moral culpability.")<br>
</ref>
The starting point is that the sentence should be 10-year ineligibility that can be increased according to the principles in s. 744.<ref>
{{supra1|Shropshire}}{{atL|1frgh|29}}
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
==Parole Ineligibility==
The parole ineligibility dates run from the date of arrest.<ref>
s. 746; {{CanLIIRP|Toor|1l21v|2005 BCCA 333 (CanLII)|, [2005] BCJ 1382 (BCCA)}}{{perBCCA|Ryan JA}}{{atL|1l21v|13}}</ref>
Several jurisdictions approve of the user of starting points for parole ineligibility.<ref>
NS: {{CanLIIR|Smith|gdr6j|2014 NSSC 352 (CanLII)}}{{perNSSC|Duncan J}}<br>
NB: {{CanLIIR|Nash|29vmr|2009 NBCA 7 (CanLII)}}{{perNBCA|Robertson JA}}<br>
</ref>
Section 745.3 requires that a jury be polled regarding eligibility.
Where the offender is a youth, s. 745.3 does not apply.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|MT|24xxc|2009 CanLII 40314 (ONSC)|, [2009] OJ No 1351}}{{perONSC|Nordheimer J}}<br>
</ref>
The minimum period of parole ineligibility is fixed and a sentence cannot go below 10 years after taking into account remand credit.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Toews|gj0df|2015 ABCA 167 (CanLII)}}{{perABCA|Costigan JA}}
</ref>
General deterrence is a valid factor to consider in assessing parole ineligibility.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Hawkins|2fdkz|2011 NSCA 7 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Beveridge JA}}{{atL|2fdkz|16}}<br>
{{CanLIIR|Nash|29vmr|2009 NBCA 7 (CanLII)}}{{perNBCA|Robertson JA}}{{atL|29vmr|4}}<br>
</ref>
An increase in ineligibility can be used to "express denunciation" and to reflect the "community's revulsion over the offence".<ref>
{{ibid1|Hawkins}}{{atL|2fdkz|42}}<br>
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}
==Ranges==
{{seealsoRanges|Homicide}}
===Second Degree===
Parole ineligibility of 20 years or more are "reserved for offenders who have established patterns of violence" which infers a high risk to re-offend.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Hutchinson|g6pwr|2014 NSSC 155 (CanLII)}}{{perNSSC|Cacchione J}}{{atL|g6pwr|53}}
</ref>
In Nova Scotia, the parole ineligibility is set within the range of 12 to 15 years.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Hawkins|2fdl5|2011 NSCA 6 (CanLII)|, [2011] NSJ No. 33}}{{perNSCA|Beveridge JA}} <br>
{{CanLIIRP|Ward|fn0kk|2011 NSCA 78 (CanLII)|, [2011] NSJ No. 481}}{{perNSCA|Saunders JA}}<br>
</ref>
Only in the extreme cases will the ineligibility be set at between 18 to 20 years.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Cerra|1jb0m|2004 BCCA 594 (CanLII)|192 CCC (3d) 78}}{{perBCCA|Donald JA}}{{atL|1jb0m|17}}: (“...parole eligibility greater than 10 years is justified when there is some particularly aggravating feature; for a penalty of greater than 15 years, egregious circumstances of a higher order of moral culpability are present.”)</ref>
; Domestic Homicide
Murder of a spouse will usually be in the range of 10 to 15 years.<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Tan|1f0l5|1996 CanLII 2500 (BCCA)|, (1996), 75 BCAC 181}}{{perBCCA|Prowse JA}}</ref>
In Ontario, domestic homicide of an unarmed partner has a range of 12 to 17 years.
<ref>
{{CanLIIRP|Czibulka|2fh90|2011 ONCA 82 (CanLII)|267 CCC (3d) 276}}{{perONCA|Laskin JA}}, suggests an upper range of 17 years<br>
{{CanLIIR|McKnight|1f9fp|1999 CanLII 3717 (ON CA)| (1999), 135 CCC (3d) 41}}{{perONCA|Laskin JA}} (2:1){{atL|1f9fp|48}}, (“No two cases are the same but similar cases from this province of brutal second-degree murders of an unarmed wife or girlfriend suggest a range of 12 to 15 years.”)
</ref>
This range was moved up from a bottom range of 10 years.<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Praljak|fvrxq|2013 ONSC 298 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Dambrot J}}{{atL|fvrxq|17}}
</ref>
{{reflist|2}}


==Ancillary Sentencing Order==
* [[Sentencing for Murder]]
; Offence-specific Orders
{{AOrderHeader}}
 
{{AOrder1| [[DNA Orders]] |s. 235 |
* {{PrimDNA1|s. 235}} }}
 
{{AOrder1| [[SOIRA Orders]]|s. 230 and 231 |
* {{SOIRA2|C|s. 230 or 231}} }}
 
{{AOrder1| [[Weapons Prohibition Orders]]|s. 230 to 236 |
* {{Section109|A|s. 230 to 236}} }}
 
{{AOrderEnd}}
 
; General Sentencing Orders
{{GeneralSentencingOrders}}
 
; General Forfeiture Orders
{{GeneralForfeitureOrders}}
 
==Record Suspensions and Pardons==
{{NoRecordSuspension-Life|s. 230 to 236}}


==History==
==History==
Line 533: Line 411:


==See Also==
==See Also==
* [[Homicide (Offence Cases)]]
* [[Homicide (Trial Verdicts)]]


; References
; References
Line 539: Line 417:


{{OffencesNavBar/Homicide}}
{{OffencesNavBar/Homicide}}


[[Category:Unconstitutional Offences]]
[[Category:Unconstitutional Offences]]

Latest revision as of 13:03, 13 May 2024

This page was last substantively updated or reviewed January 2020. (Rev. # 92548)


Murder
s. 235 of the Crim. Code
Election / Plea
Crown Election Indictment
Jurisdiction Sup. Court w/ Jury (*)

Sup. Court w/ Judge-alone (*)

* Preliminary inquiry also available.
Indictable Dispositions
Avail. Disp. Discharge (730)

Suspended Sentence (731(1)(a))
Fine (734)
Fine + Probation (731(1)(b))
Jail (718.3, 787)
Jail + Probation (731(1)(b))
Jail + Fine (734)

Conditional Sentence (742.1)
Minimum life incarceration
Maximum Life
Reference
Offence Elements
Sentence Digests

Overview

See also: Homicide (Offence)

Offences relating to murder are found in Part VIII of the Criminal Code concerning "Offences Against the Person and Reputation".

Pleadings
Offence
Section		 Offence
Type		 Crown Election Defence Election
s. 536(2)		 Preliminary Inquiry
s. 235 [first or second degree murder] Indictable Offence(s) (life max)

Offences under s. 235 [first or second degree murder] are exclusive jurisdiction offences under s. 469 and so cannot be tried by a provincial court judge. It is presumptively tried by judge and jury.

Before the Crown can rely on provisions increasing the duration of the weapons prohibition order due to a prior weapons prohibition order notice under s. 727 must be given prior to plea.

Release

Where an accused is charged with any offence listed in s. 469 [including 235], he will be remanded under s. 515(11). The accused may only be released by a superior court judge under s. 522.

Publication Bans

For all criminal or regulatory prosecutions, there is a discretionary general publication ban available on application of the Crown, victim or witness to prohibit the publishing of "any information that could identify the victim or witness" under s. 486.5(1) where it is "necessary" for the "proper administration of justice". Other available publication bans include prohibitions for publishing evidence or other information arising from a bail hearing (s. 517), preliminary inquiry (s. 539) or jury trial (s. 648). There is a mandatory publication ban in all youth prosecutions on information tending to identify young accused under s. 110 of the YCJA or young victims under s. 111 of the YCJA.

Offence Designations
Offence(s) Wiretap
Eligible
s. 183		 Dangerous Offender
Designated Offence
s. 752		 Serious Personal
Injury Offence
s. 752		 AG Consent Required Serious Criminality
Offence
s. 36 IRPA
s. 235 [first or second degree murder] (primary)

Offences under s. 235 are designated offences eligible for wiretap under s. 183.


See below in Ancillary Sentencing Orders for details on designations relating to sentencing orders.

Offence Wording

Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide
Murder

229 Culpable homicide is murder

(a) where the person who causes the death of a human being
(i) means to cause his death, or
(ii) means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not;
(b) where a person, meaning to cause death to a human being or meaning to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and being reckless whether death ensues or not, by accident or mistake causes death to another human being, notwithstanding that he does not mean to cause death or bodily harm to that human being; or
(c) if a person, for an unlawful object, does anything that they know is likely to cause death, and by doing so causes the death of a human being, even if they desire to effect their object without causing death or bodily harm to any human being.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 229; 2019, c. 25, s. 77.
[annotation(s) added]

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 229


Defined terms: "homicide" (s. 222)

Classification of murder

231 (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.

Planned and deliberate murder

(2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.
[omitted (3), (4), (5), (6), (6.01), (6.1) and (6.2)]

Second degree murder

(7) All murder that is not first degree murder is second degree murder.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 231; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 7, 35, 40, 185(F), c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1997, c. 16, s. 3, c. 23, s. 8; 2001, c. 32, s. 9, c. 41, s. 9; 2009, c. 22, s. 5.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 231(1) and (27)

Punishment for murder

235 (1) Every one who commits first degree murder or second degree murder is guilty of an indictable offence and shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life.

Minimum punishment

(2) For the purposes of Part XXIII [Pt. XXIII – Sentencing (ss. 716 to 751.1)], the sentence of imprisonment for life prescribed by this section is a minimum punishment.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 218; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 3; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 5.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 235(1) and (2)

Imprisonment for Life
Sentence of life imprisonment

745 Subject to section 745.1 [murder conviction – under 18 – instruction], the sentence to be pronounced against a person who is to be sentenced to imprisonment for life shall be

(a) in respect of a person who has been convicted of high treason or first degree murder, that the person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
(b) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of culpable homicide that is murder, however described in this Act, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
(b.1) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder where that person has previously been convicted of an offence under section 4 or 6 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act that had as its basis an intentional killing, whether or not it was planned and deliberate, that that person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served twenty-five years of the sentence;
(c) in respect of a person who has been convicted of second degree murder, that the person be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served at least ten years of the sentence or such greater number of years, not being more than twenty-five years, as has been substituted therefor pursuant to section 745.4; and
[omitted (d)]

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 745; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 10; 1990, c. 17, s. 14; 1992, c. 51, s. 39; 1995, c. 22, s. 6; 2000, c. 24, s. 46.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 745

Draft Form of Charges

See also: Draft Form of Charges
Pre-ambles
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, between the <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR> and <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR>***, at or near <COMMUNITY/TOWN/CITY>, <PROVINCE>, he [or she]..." OR
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, on or about the <DATE> day of <MONTH>, <YEAR>, at or near <COMMUNITY/TOWN/CITY>, <PROVINCE>, he [or she]..." OR
"AND FURTHER at the same time and place aforesaid, he [or she]..."
Code Section Subject of Offence Draft Wording
235 first degree murder "..., did cause the death of [person] and thereby commit murder in the first degree, to wit: [conduct], contrary to section 235 of the Criminal Code.
235 second degree murder "..., did cause the death of [person] and thereby commit murder in the second degree, to wit: [conduct], contrary to section 235 of the Criminal Code.

Proof of the Offence

Proving murder under s. 229(a) should include:

  1. ☐ identity of accused as culprit
  2. ☐ date and time of the incident
  3. ☐ jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. ☐ the accused does anything that causes death; and
  5. ☐ the accused either had:
    1. ☐ an intent to cause death or
    2. ☐ an intent to cause bodily harm that the accused knew was likely to cause death and was reckless as to whether death ensues or not.[1]

Proving transferred intent murder under s. 229(b) should include:

  1. ☐ identity of accused as culprit
  2. ☐ date and time of the incident
  3. ☐ jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. ☐ the culprit means:
    1. ☐ to cause death to a person or
    2. ☐ to cause bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause death to a person; and
  5. ☐ the culprit is reckless to whether death ensues
  6. ☐ the culprit causes death by accident or mistake of a different person

Proving unlawful act murder under s. 229(c) should include:[2]

  1. ☐ identity of accused as culprit
  2. ☐ date and time of the incident
  3. ☐ jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. ☐ the culprit does a dangerous act
  5. ☐ the act is for an unlawful object
  6. ☐ he knows that the act is likely to cause death (knowledge or forethought)
  7. ☐ the unlawful act causes death

First Degree Murder

Proof of the element of "planned and deliberate", or any of the specific elements of 231(3),(4),(5),(6.01),(6.1), and (6.2), are necessary to make out first degree murder. Without this element, second degree murder is made out.

Section 582 requires the indictment specially indications the charge of first degree murder before there can be a conviction for first degree murder.

  1. ↑ R v Paskimin, 2012 SKCA 35 (CanLII), 393 Sask R 30, per Herauf JA, at para 33
  2. ↑ see R v Roks, 2011 ONCA 618 (CanLII), 284 CCC (3d) 510, per Watt JA

Constitutionality

See also: Offences Found to be Unconstitutional#Constructive Murder

The portion of s. 229(c) that states "ought to know" is unconstitutional and is of no force or effect to the provision.[1]

Section 230 was found unconstitutional because first degree murder cannot be less than objective foresight of death.[2]

  1. ↑ R v Martineau, 1990 CanLII 80 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 633, per Lamer CJ -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional
    R v Sit, 1991 CanLII 34 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 124, per Lamer CJ
  2. ↑ R v Vaillancourt, 1987 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636, per Lamer J
    Martineau, supra -- found s.230 (constructive murder) unconstitutional

Murder

First degree and second degree murder are not separate offences. Section 231, defining first degree murder, is "purely a classification section and does not create a separate substantive offence." The distinction is only for the purpose of sentencing.[1] First degree murder is an "aggravated form of murder and not a distinct substantive offence."[2]

The offence of murder under s. 235 is an exclusive jurisdiction offence, and so cannot be tried before a provincial court judge.[3]

  1. ↑ R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, per Cory J, at para 17
  2. ↑ R v Harbottle, 1993 CanLII 71 (SCC), [1993] 3 SCR 306, per Cory J at 323
  3. ↑ see s. 469 and Election

Causation

See Causation of Death

Intent

Both types of murder require one of three categories of requisite intent set out in s.229:

  1. the culprit causes death and "means to cause death"; (s. 229(a)(i))
  2. the culprit causes death and "means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not". (s. 229(a)(ii))
  3. the culprit causes death but does so by accident or mistake, while at some point during the act forms a meaning set out above in 229(a)(i) or 229(a)(ii). (s.229(b))
  4. causes death while pursuing an "unlawful object" that "he knows or ought to know is likely to cause death". (s.229(c))

The necessary intent for murder requires proving a subjective foresight of death.[1]

The requisite intent does not need to be simultaneous to the act that causes death. The two must coincide with the "transaction" that forms the substance of the killing. The intent does not need to be present throughout the acts or series of actions or events. [2]

An accused may still be convicted if he does not know the victim's identity[3] or is mistaken as to the victim's identity.[4]

Foreseeable Death (s. 229(a)(ii))

The Crown must prove that the accused had actual subjective forsight of the victim's death as a "probable consequence" of the assault.[5]

The phrase "is reckless whether death ensues or not" has been characterized as "largely redundant."[6]

Section 229(b)

Section 229(b) has the same requirements as s. 229(a) except that it applies where the conduct and intent was directed at a third party and the victim was killed by accident or mistake. This effectively creates a form of transferred intent for murder.

  1. ↑ R v Vaillancourt, 1987 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636, per Lamer J
  2. ↑ R v Cooper, 1993 CanLII 147 (SCC), [1993] 1 SCR 146, per Cory J
  3. ↑ R v Marshall, 1986 CanLII 4617 (NSCA), 25 CCC (3d) 151, per Clarke JA
  4. ↑ R v Prevost, 1988 CanLII 7058 (ON CA), 42 CCC (3d) 314, per Zuber JA
  5. ↑ R v Rodgerson, 2014 ONCA 366 (CanLII), 309 CCC (3d) 535, per Doherty JA, at para 24 ("The impugned instruction was given in the course of the trial judge’s description of the elements of self-defence, although a similar brief passage also appears in his instructions on intoxication. However, in the part of the instruction dealing specifically with the state of mind required for murder, the trial judge on at least three occasions correctly set out the foreseeability requirement in s. 229(a)(ii), telling the jury that the Crown had to prove that the appellant foresaw Ms. Young’s death as the probable consequence of his assault on her.")
    Vaillantcourt, supra, at para 11 ("Here again the accused must have actual subjective foresight of the likelihood of death. However, the Crown need no longer prove that he intended to cause the death but only that he was reckless whether death ensued or not. It should also be noted that s. 212(a)(ii) is limited to cases where the accused intended to cause bodily harm to the victim.")
  6. ↑ Rodgerson, ibid., at para 23

Planned and Deliberate (s. 231(2))

Murder by Unlawful Act or Object (s. 229(c) and 231(3) to (6))

Lesser Included Offences

See also: Lesser Included Offences

662
[omitted (1)]

First degree murder charged

(2) For greater certainty and without limiting the generality of subsection (1) [offence charged, part only proved], where a count charges first degree murder and the evidence does not prove first degree murder but proves second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of first degree murder but guilty of second degree murder or an attempt to commit second degree murder, as the case may be.

Conviction for infanticide or manslaughter on charge of murder

(3) Subject to subsection (4) [conviction for concealing body of child where murder or infanticide charged], where a count charges murder and the evidence proves manslaughter or infanticide but does not prove murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter or infanticide, but shall not on that count find the accused guilty of any other offence.
[omitted (4), (5) and (6)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 662; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 134; 2000, c. 2, s. 3; 2008, c. 6, s. 38; 2018, c. 21, s. 20.
[annotation(s) added]

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 662(2) and (3)

Where the Crown proves an intent to kill but fails to prove causation, the lesser included offence of attempted murder is available.[1]

  1. ↑ R v Sarrazin, 2010 ONCA 577 (CanLII), 259 CCC (3d) 293, per Doherty JA

Res Judicata

Circumstances of aggravation

610
[omitted (1)]

Effect of previous charge of murder or manslaughter

(2) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as manslaughter or infanticide, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for manslaughter or infanticide bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as murder.

Previous charges of first degree murder

(3) A conviction or an acquittal on an indictment for first degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as second degree murder, and a conviction or acquittal on an indictment for second degree murder bars a subsequent indictment for the same homicide charging it as first degree murder.
[omitted (4)]
R.S., c. C-34, s. 538; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 5; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 9.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 610(2) and (3)

Manslaughter

Proof of Death

Death occurs once the vital functions and organs irreversibly cease to operate.[1]

The Crown must prove as an essential element that the victim is dead. In most cases this is a trivial fact. It is only in murder cases with a missing body that there may be an issue in proving the element.[2]

There is no rule requiring that body be found in order to prove a homicide.[3]

  1. ↑ R v Green, 1988 CanLII 3274 (BC SC), 43 CCC (3d) 413, per Wood J
  2. ↑ e.g. R v Pritchard, 2007 BCCA 82 (CanLII), 217 CCC (3d) 1, per Hall JA, aff'd at SCC in 236 CCC (3d) 301, 2008 SCC 59 (CanLII), [2008] 3 SCR 195, per Binnie J -- conviction for first degree with no evidence of body or how the victim died
    R v St-Germain, 2009 QCCA 1474 (CanLII), per Dufresne JA
  3. ↑ R v CMM, 2012 MBQB 141 (CanLII), 93 CR (6th) 155, per Joyal CJ ("For example, the absence of a body in a murder prosecution will not preclude a conviction where the other direct and/or circumstantial evidence establishes that an unlawful death has occurred involving an identifiable victim. ")

Special Procedure

High treason and first degree murder

582 No person shall be convicted for the offence of high treason or first degree murder unless in the indictment charging the offence he is specifically charged with that offence.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 511; 1973-74, c. 38, s. 4; 1974-75-76, c. 105, s. 6.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 582

Joinder or Severance of Counts
Count for murder

589 No count that charges an indictable offence other than murder shall be joined in an indictment to a count that charges murder unless

(a) the count that charges the offence other than murder arises out of the same transaction as a count that charges murder; or
(b) the accused signifies consent to the joinder of the counts.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 589; 1991, c. 4, s. 2.

– CCC (CanLII), (DOJ)

Note up: 589

Defences

The statutory defence of duress is excluded by s. 17 from applying to offences of murder.

The argument of excessive use of force in self-defence does not reduce murder to manslaughter.[1]

  1. ↑ R v Reilly, 1984 CanLII 83 (SCC), [1984] 2 SCR 396, per Ritchie J
    see also Self-Defence and Defence of Another

Participation of Third Parties

See also: Role of the Victim and Third Parties and Testimonial Aids for Young, Disabled or Vulnerable Witnesses
Testimonial Aids

Certain persons who testify are entitled to make application for the use of testimonial aids: Exclusion of Public (s. 486), Use of a Testimonial Screen (s. 486), Access to Support Person While Testifying (s. 486.1), Close Proximity Video-link Testimony (s. 486.2), Self-Represented Cross-Examination Prohibition Order (s. 486.3), and Witness Security Order (s. 486.7).

A witness, victim or complainant may also request publication bans (s. 486.4, 486.5) and/or a Witness Identity Non-disclosure Order (s. 486.31). See also, Publication Bans, above.

On Finding of Guilt
Offence(s) Victim Notice
of Agreement
s. 606(4.1) [SPIO]		 Victim Queried
for Interest in Agreement
s. 606(4.2) [5+ years]		 Victim Notice
for Restitution
s. 737.1		 Victim Notice
of Impact Statement
s. 722(2)
s. 235 [first or second degree murder]

Under s. 738, a judge must inquire from the Crown before sentencing whether "reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victims with an opportunity to indicate whether they are seeking restitution for their losses and damages".

Under s. 722(2), the judge must inquire "[a]s soon as feasible" before sentencing with the Crown "if reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victim with an opportunity to prepare" a victim impact statement. This will include any person "who has suffered, or is alleged to have suffered, physical or emotional harm, property damage or economic loss" as a result of the offence. Individuals representing a community impacted by the crime may file a statement under s. 722.2.

Sentencing Principles and Ranges

History

See also: List of Criminal Code Amendments and Table of Concordance (Criminal Code)

2001 to 2009

Classification of murder

231 (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.

Planned and deliberate murder

(2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.

Contracted murder

(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (2), murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death.

Murder of peace officer, etc.

(4) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder when the victim is

(a) a police officer, police constable, constable, sheriff, deputy sheriff, sheriff’s officer or other person employed for the preservation and maintenance of the public peace, acting in the course of his duties;
(b) a warden, deputy warden, instructor, keeper, jailer, guard or other officer or a permanent employee of a prison, acting in the course of his duties; or
(c) a person working in a prison with the permission of the prison authorities and acting in the course of his work therein.
Hijacking, sexual assault or kidnapping

(5) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder in respect of a person when the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an offence under one of the following sections:

(a) section 76 (hijacking an aircraft);
(b) section 271 (sexual assault);
(c) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm);
(d) section 273 (aggravated sexual assault);
(e) section 279 (kidnapping and forcible confinement); or
(f) section 279.1 (hostage taking).
Criminal harassment

(6) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an offence under section 264 and the person committing that offence intended to cause the person murdered to fear for the safety of the person murdered or the safety of anyone known to the person murdered.

Murder during terrorist activity

(6.01) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of a person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused while committing or attempting to commit an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament where the act or omission constituting the offence also constitutes a terrorist activity.

Using explosives in association with criminal organization

(6.1) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of a person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused while committing or attempting to commit an offence under section 81 for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization.

Intimidation

(6.2) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of a person, murder is first degree murder when the death is caused while committing or attempting to commit an offence under section 423.1.

Second degree murder

(7) All murder that is not first degree murder is second degree murder.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 231; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 7, 35, 40, 185(F), c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1997, c. 16, s. 3, c. 23, s. 8; 2001, c. 32, s. 9, c. 41, s. 9.

– CCC

See Also

References
v • e
 
Homicide
Offences / Sentencing
Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Murder_(Offence)&oldid=92548"